💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 6579.gmi captured on 2023-12-28 at 18:02:12. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Situations vacant - Can refugees help to plug Europe s skilled-labour gaps?

2018-06-28 09:31:53

Employing migrants in Germany and Sweden

THE canteen of Stockholm University could scarcely be more Swedish. Young blond

students sip coffee and tap away on Macs. In room 3.89, an outpost of the

campus, is another, newer Sweden. Refugees, all of them teachers, from lands

far to the south and east are preparing for the classrooms of their new home.

Several keep their coats on as Khadije Obeid takes them through the basics of

the curriculum and shows a YouTube clip about education law. In Syria the

teacher has much authority, says Samer, an English teacher, as he raises his

hand above his head. Here he is equal to the students, he adds as he lowers

it.

The ten women and seven men are on a fast-track programme for refugees with

experience in occupations where labour is short. As well as learning Swedish,

they get 26 weeks of daily classes, teaching practice and mentoring. The hope

is that they will then train or, if their previous qualifications are

recognised, go straight to the classroom. The government is running some 30

other programmes, for builders, chefs, medics and more; 5,300 people were

enrolled in 2016 and 2017, of whom around 1,000 were in the teachers scheme.

Within two years most fast-trackers are employed.

In 2015 no European country took in more asylum-seekers, relative to its

population, than Sweden. None accepted greater absolute numbers than Germany.

Both countries badly need workers. Sweden is training 8,500 fewer teachers

annually than it should. A study by the German Chamber of Commerce estimates

that 1.6m open jobs cannot be filled with appropriately skilled workers. Today

Germany lacks 110,000 nurses and carers; by 2030 it will need 300,000 as its

population greys.

When 2.6m asylum-seekers arrived in Europe in 2015-16, the political mood

quickly turned sour. Yet many argued not only that it was right to welcome them

on humanitarian grounds, but also that both the new arrivals most of them young

and, it was said, educated and their host countries could gain economically.

Hope and experience

Those hopes have not yet been borne out. Both Germany and Sweden have pumped

resources into getting newcomers into training or employment and have shifted

legal barriers in order to let them work sooner. But Sweden s fast-track

programmes serve only a fraction of the 110,500 adult arrivals in 2015 and 2016

(around half of whom were granted asylum). In 2017 only a third of refugees who

completed a two-year full-time integration programme were working or studying

three months later, according to Statistics Sweden. In the first quarter of

2018 this rose to 41%, but only 6% were in unsubsidised jobs. Refugees in

Germany have historically fared a bit better. Yet nearly three-quarters of

those in work have jobs needing few skills and with poor prospects.

Given time, things may come right. Of refugees arriving in the EU in the 1990s

and early 2000s, 56% were in work after a decade; those who had clocked up two

decades had caught up with natives. But time and patience are short. We re at

a critical junction, says Thomas Liebig of the OECD. The political mood has

hardened. Last year the populist Alternative for Germany entered the Bundestag;

coalition talks this year nearly collapsed over migration. The right-wing

Sweden Democrats have been polling strongly, ahead of an election in September.

The talent pool is not huge. The refugees who arrived here in Sweden are less

skilled than we initially thought, says Patrick Joyce, a Swedish economist. Of

the 92,000 adult asylum-seekers who arrived in 2015, half did not finish high

school. Language is often the biggest hurdle. The skills asylum-seekers do have

often do not fit local needs. Many newcomers to Germany are experienced car

mechanics, for example, but Germany s shortage is in mechatronics, which

requires knowledge of information technology rather than fiddling with fuel

pumps.

Even when refugees skills are in demand, regulations can still keep them out

of jobs. Germany lacks workers in some certified professions, which require

lengthy training. Nurses from abroad, regardless of experience, must do up to

three years of vocational training before being taken on. Such barriers push

refugees into less skilled, poorly paid jobs. Sweden has fewer regulated

trades. Even so, employment rates among graduates of the health-care fast-track

scheme are half the average.

The best hope of matching supply more precisely to demand is to build up the

skills of young migrants. Apprenticeships really are the golden route in

Germany, says Mr Liebig. Most refugees are young; within a few years they can

gain a skill that is in demand and a job for years to come. But time to train

is a luxury: often their priority is to get a job, however poorly paid, to send

money home or to reunite their families. And both countries have become less

generous in granting permanent residency, reducing both migrants incentive to

train and employers incentive to train them.

Now comes a new difficulty: getting women to work. Those who arrived in 2015-16

were mainly men; their wives are following them. Female refugees typically have

the lowest employment rates of any group. Getting them into work and to leave

children at a creche can be a big barrier, says Caroline Jonsson from the

Public Employment Service. But here in Sweden we don t have stay-at-home mums.

Focusing on female refugees, as both Germany and Sweden have begun to do, can

pay. If they have jobs, the better their children especially daughters tend to

do when they join the labour market, says the OECD. As with men, so with women:

moving on from receiving refugees to integrating them is a long game. But in

fractious Europe, how long do policymakers have?