💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 5054.gmi captured on 2023-12-28 at 18:55:24. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2014-03-21 10:44:44
There was quite an outpouring of support and criticism when last week
LeanIn.org, the organisation that sprouted from Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg s
eponymous (and much-debated) book, launched its campaign to ban the word bossy
.
The group called its effort a public service campaign to ensure that girls
grow up with the confidence and support they need to become leaders.
The idea: girls are often called bossy when they display leadership traits,
while boys are praised. To change the conversation, and avoid labelling and
discouraging girls from reaching for top roles, it s necessary to eliminate the
word entirely, explains the Ban Bossy campaign. Celebrities like Beyonce, Katie
Couric and Alicia Keys have joined in and so has US First Lady Michelle Obama.
But, ban an entire word from the lexicon? Is it really the right way to go? Or
should we be teaching our children the difference between bossy and being the
boss? Several LinkedIn Influencers weighed in on the topic, including Sandberg
and LeanIn.org s president. Here s what some of them had to say.
Rachel Schall Thomas, president at LeanIn.org; Sheryl Sandberg, chief operating
officer at Facebook
Ban Bossy has sparked a conversation online and offline with girls sharing
their leadership aspirations, mothers and fathers celebrating their daughters
potential and women sharing their own bossy stories, wrote Thomas and Sandberg
in their post The Other B-Word. Why does this have so much resonance? Because
almost every woman we know has a bossy story .
Thomas and Sandberg wrote that they, too, were called bossy as girls. Decades
later, the word still stings, and we remember the sentiments it evoked: Keep
your voice down. Don t raise your hand. Don t take the lead. If you do, people
won t like you, they wrote. This is not just about a single word. The
stereotypes behind the word bossy are deep rooted and discouraging.
The pair wrote that boys are expected to be assertive and confident, while
girls are expected to be kind and nurturing. We encourage boys to lead and
reward them when they do. When girls lead, however, we disapprove and our
language communicates that disapproval clearly. As girls become women, the
childhood b-word bossy is replaced by the b-word adult women face along
with aggressive, angry, and too ambitious. The words change, but their
impact doesn t, they wrote. Women are less well liked when they lead, and all
of us are affected. The bossy stereotype contributes to the dearth of
leadership we face in every industry and every government.
Adam Grant, professor at Wharton School of Business
Many girls want to lead, only to be discouraged by criticism for taking the
reins. By launching a campaign to ban the word bossy , Sheryl Sandberg is
planting important seeds for many more women to become leaders. For these seeds
to blossom, we need to understand the behaviours that lead people to brand
girls as bossy, wrote Grant in his post Why Girls Get Called Bossy and How to
Avoid It.
Grant explained: Girls get pegged as bossy when they order people around. Yet
we don t label every girl who issues commands and exercises authority as bossy,
he wrote. To make sense of bossiness, we need to tease apart two fundamental
aspects of social hierarchy that are often lumped together: power and status.
Power lies in holding a formal position of authority or controlling important
resources. Status involves being respected or admired.
So how does this play into the Ban Bossy campaign? Several studies offer
insight, he wrote. When young women get called bossy, it s often because they
re trying to exercise power without status. It s not a problem that they re
being dominant; the backlash arises because they re overstepping their status,
wrote Grant.
If that s the case, then banning bossy might not be the right or only move
instead, it might be more about discouraging certain behaviour, he wrote. If
we want girls to receive positive reinforcement for early acts of leadership,
let s discourage bossy behaviour along with banning bossy labels. He wrote
that this means teaching them to do things that earn admiration before they
assert their authority.
Some bossy acts fail the test of executive leadership skills, wrote Grant.
Great leaders begin by earning status through their contributions, and only
then assert their authority.
Jennifer Merritt, Editor of BBC Capital
It sounds empowering: Ban the term bossy to help push girls and young women
into pursuing leadership roles, wrote Merritt in her post Don t Ban Bossy.
But I just can't get behind the movement.
Why not support banning a term that discourages young women? Bossy exists and
it isn't pretty and it should be called out and corrected. It should also, if
possible, be harnessed and perhaps turned into the leadership traits COO of
Facebook, Sheryl Sandberg hopes girls will develop, wrote Merritt.
When her four-year-old daughter asks if the people who work for me have to do
what you tell them to do , Merritt wrote, I am quick to make the distinction:
I don't boss people around, I include them and treat them nicely (the grown-up
term would be with respect ). I'm not stubborn when one of my ideas doesn't
pan out, and I seek their input.
I look at my daughter and see a little girl with an awful lot of potential.
And I see an awful lot of bossy. I'm keen to foster the former and diminish the
latter. But I can't do that without the word bossy in my vocabulary, wrote
Merritt. She would rather her daughter has a firm grasp of the difference
between taking charge and being bossy so that if another child calls her bossy
one day, she can smile and just ignore the comment, knowing she's got a good
idea and she's going for it.
Another reason not to ban bossy, wrote Merritt, is to teach children to let
negative words and phrases roll off you, wrote Merritt. What about that old
saying, I'm rubber and you're glue, whatever you say bounces off of me and
sticks to you ?