💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 3657.gmi captured on 2023-12-28 at 19:43:45. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Moscow, eyeing U.S. missile defense plans, announces work on 100-ton monster

2011-12-21 09:11:55

rlp

By Laura Rozen | The Envoy

During campaign season, it never hurts for a presidential candidate facing a

frustrated public to display toughness and resolve in the face of an old and

familiar adversary. And it also doesn't hurt to throw in some

shock-and-awe--say, a ballistic missile nicknamed "Satan."

This appears to at least partly explain why on Monday Russia announced that it

had successfully tested a short-range interceptor missile; part of its ongoing

effort to develop a domestic missile defense system, according to Russia's RIA

News Agency. (The Russian Defense Ministry has provided a video of the

missile's launch on its website.) Russia also announced it is working on the

development of a 100-ton ballistic missile slated for release in 2015, Pravda

reports. Russia recently held contested parliamentary polls and is due to hold

presidential elections in March. Russia watchers note the political backdrop to

the announced plans and their part in the wider narrative agenda: resurgent

Russia's determined opposition to American missile defense plans in Eastern

Europe.

"In connection with the plans of the United States to develop the air defense

system in Europe, in close vicinity to Russia's borders, and because of the

unwillingness of the U.S. side to provide any guarantees, the Russian

Federation continues to take measures to preserve parity in the field," Pravda

reports.

"Russia does not stand against the U.S. missile defense system," Sergei

Karakaev, the Russian Defense Ministry commander of the missile troops, was

cited by the paper. "Russia stands against the creation of the missile defense

system, which would be directly aimed against Russia to potentially reduce the

possibilities of the Russian nuclear containment forces."

The field tests come a month after Russia's outgoing president Dmitry Medvedev

declared that he was walking away in protest from U.S.-Russian missile defense

negotiations. "The United States is unwilling to provide a written guarantee

that the system would not be used against Russian nuclear forces," the Union of

Concerned Scientists' Elliot Negin wrote at the Huffington Post Monday. "

[Medvedev] warned that, if the United States carries out its plans to build it

without such an assurance, Russia would site missiles in its westernmost

Kaliningrad region and consider walking away from the New START agreement."

(The strategic arms reduction treaty, signed last year, calls for the United

States and Russia to reduce their stockpiles of nuclear arms by a third over

the next seven years.)

Medvedev's throwing down the gauntlet on missile defense talks with the West

also played to a delicate moment in Russian domestic politics, analysts say.

Medvedev has served since 2008 as the Kremlin-approved placeholder for Russian

president Vladimir Putin after the latter served two terms as president and

moved over to serve a term as prime minister. However, Putin, a former KGB

colonel, announced in September his plans to run for president again in March.

But things haven't gone as smoothly as Putin planned. Putin's United Russia

party barely claimed a majority in contested Russian parliamentary polls held

Dec. 5 that many Russians and international observers believed were rigged.

Protests ensued, with another major demonstration scheduled for Dec. 24.

"Putin typically has consolidated his power by pursuing campaigns against

nefarious foes -- Chechen extremists, Russian oligarchs, and now the West,"

Anya Schmemann, a Russia watcher at the Council on Foreign Relations, told

Yahoo News Tuesday. "This is a time-tested tactic in Russia. The Russian

government's threat in November to target missile defense sites fits into this

category--blustery talk for a domestic audience. However, the Russian public

has become more savvy in recent years and Putin's effort to blame the United

States and Clinton for supporting the protests and criticizing the elections

was mocked in the streets."

"Russia's military establishment is concerned about losing parity with the

United States on the number of deployed strategic nuclear warheads that it

maintains," the Ploughshare Fund's Joel Rubin told Yahoo News Tuesday. "By

developing a new heavy missile, a perverse outcome is taking place, where

Russia is attempting to not fall further beneath New START levels in order to

satisfy the concerns of its military establishment."

Of course, tough-guy posturing on the well-worn grooves of the Cold War axis is

not unique to Moscow. On Saturday, President Obama's nominated envoy to Moscow,

Michael McFaul, was finally confirmed after Republican Senator Mark Kirk of

Illinois lifted a weeks-long hold on the nominee.

"Kirk lifted his objections after the White House wrote him a letter assuring

him that it will 'not provide Russia with sensitive information about our

missile defense systems that would in any way compromise our national

security,'" Agence-France Press reported. "Specifically the White House told

Kirk that 'under no circumstances' would the United States provide hit-to-kill

technology and interceptor telemetry to Russia."