💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 1259.gmi captured on 2023-12-28 at 20:22:07. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

PROMISES, PROMISES: Obama tax pledge unrealistic

2009-07-09 04:11:31

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press Writer Stephen Ohlemacher, Associated

Press Writer Wed Jul 8, 9:21 pm ET

WASHINGTON President Barack Obama promised to fix health care and trim the

federal budget deficit, all without raising taxes on anyone but the wealthiest

Americans. It's a promise he's already broken and will likely have to break

again. Obama and the Democratic-controlled Congress have already increased

tobacco taxes which disproportionately hit the poor to pay for extending

health coverage to 4 million children in working low-income families.

Now, lawmakers are looking for more revenues to help pay for providing medical

insurance to millions more who lack it at a projected cost of $1 trillion over

the next decade.

The floated proposals include increasing taxes on alcohol, which could raise

$62 billion over the next decade, and a new tax on sugary drinks such as soda,

which could raise $52 billion.

Senate Democrats this week pretty much rejected a proposal by Finance Committee

Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., to tax health benefits, an idea that Obama

repeatedly criticized during the presidential election campaign but has refused

to take off the table.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said negotiators are still looking for revenue

alternatives. Asked during an interview with The Associated Press if they

included tax increases on families with incomes less than $250,000 a year,

Schumer said, "There are lots of things on the table now."

The health care bill is a long way from Obama's desk, but tax experts say the

debate illustrates a stark reality: It is simply implausible for the vast

majority of Americans to get a free ride while the nation tackles such an

incredibly difficult and expensive issue.

"We're all going to have to contribute," said Eugene Steuerle, a former

treasury official in the Reagan administration and now vice president of the

Peter G. Peterson Foundation.

Paying for Obama's agenda might be easier, Steuerle said, if the nation wasn't

already facing massive federal budget deficits for the foreseeable future.

"The dilemma is trying to do the new while the old is still unpaid for,"

Steuerle said.

The federal budget deficit is projected to hit an unprecedented $1.8 trillion

this year on top of a national debt that has already topped $11 trillion.

Obama insists that any bill on health care or climate change not add to the

debt.

Obama says much of the $1 trillion needed for his health care overhaul will

come from cutting costs. So far, drug companies and hospitals have agreed to

provide 10-year savings of $235 billion.

Health care experts say cost cutting alone won't produce enough money to insure

the nearly 50 million Americans who lack coverage. Moreover, Congress is

obligated to follow budget rules that might not recognize many of the promised

savings.

"The administration has an extremely difficult educational problem on its

hands," said Henry J. Aaron, a health care expert at the Brookings Institution.

"They understand that at some point tax increase are going to be necessary

across the board.

"Yes, for the middle class, too," he added.

Obama made a firm tax pledge during the presidential campaign, repeating it

numerous times in the weeks and months leading up to Election Day: no tax

increases for individuals making less than $200,000 a year or couples making

less than $250,000.

"Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not

any of your taxes," Obama told a crowd in Dover, N.H., last year.

But less than a month after taking office, Obama signed an expansion of child

health care financed by 62-cent tax increase on each pack of cigarettes.

Obama also signed an anti-smoking bill in June that grants authority to the

Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco. To pay for the new program, a

fee is being imposed on the industry and presumably passed on to consumers

estimated to generate more than $5 billion over the next decade.

While not directly increasing taxes, a House-passed version of Obama's plan to

reduce greenhouse gases blamed for causing global warming would similarly

increase American families' home energy bills by $175 a year on average,

according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Obama hasn't offered a detailed plan to fix health care, though his aides are

working with lawmakers as they craft proposals. Obama included only a down

payment for health care reform in the budget proposal he unveiled this spring.

He proposed limiting itemized tax deductions for individuals making more than

$200,000 and couples making more than $250,000. The plan, which faces stiff

opposition in Congress, would limit deductions for mortgage insurance, state

and local taxes and charitable contributions, raising about $270 billion over

the next decade.

Obama also proposed a series of business tax increases and accounting changes

that would raise an additional $30 billion.

Kenneth Baer, a spokesman for the OMB, said Obama's cost reductions and tax

increases add up to "a plan which gets you really close to what you need."

"Congress has other ideas," Baer said. "We'll work with them."

The appeal of Baucus's proposed tax on health benefits was the amount of money

it could raise. Currently, employer-provided health benefits are not taxed,

regardless of how generous they are.

One version of it would tax health benefits that exceed the value of the basic

insurance plan offered to federal workers, raising about $420 billion over the

next decade, according to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation. But

limiting it to individuals making more than $100,000 a year and couples making

more than $200,000 would raise only $162 billion.

The math illustrates how difficult it is to raise enough money to pay for

expensive programs, when tax increases are limited to the wealthy.

"We're living in an era, over a period of 20 years or more, in which the idea

that tax rates would actually be boosted is unutterable," said Aaron, the

health care expert. "That has to stop."