💾 Archived View for tilde.club › ~oldernow › 2023-11-29-12-38-00.gmi captured on 2023-12-28 at 17:17:18. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
One occasionally encounters verbiage describing the importance of acquiring conceptuality - aka reality - context when attempting to understanding something communicated by another.
I submit that individuality might be thought of as a complete conceptuality/reality context.
Unto *itself*, i.e. each instance a conceptuality/reality world shrink-wrapped unto itself.
Regardless how clear a speaker/writers attempts to be understood, they cannot communicate/deliver their entire conceptuality/reality context all at once, leaving listeners/readers to grok - i.e. find meaning in - what they receive in their own conceptuality/reality context.
The only way all could possibly truly understand each other is to have the identical conceptuality/reality contexts.
That quickly becomes a boundless problem as number of listeners/readers increases.
Therefore, given conceptuality/reality context limitations, the only possible identical/common conceptuality/reality context for all is *NO* conceptuality/reality context, which is to say the absence of individuality/self.
Any questions on why all must "lose themselves" in order for us to be One?