💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 000676.gmi captured on 2023-12-28 at 15:51:03. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-11-04)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re outreach and YouTubers

1. Chris Were (chriswere (a) posteo.net)

Hello Gemini mailing list,

My name's Chris Were and I run a small PeerTube/YouTube. Please forgive 
any breach in protocol, I'm not used to mailing lists.

I noticed that YouTubers were mentioned as part of gemini outreach and 
wanted to let you all know that I, for one, am incredibly excited to be 
part of this growing community of talented individuals. I'm no-where 
near as knowledgable as those on this list, but I'm thoroughly enjoying 
learning about self-hosting and this amazing new internet protocol.

I'm open to feedback as to how I might help grow the community, but I 
also understand there's a degree of animosity about YouTubers. I'd just 
like to say that I really hope to be a constructive community member 
when it comes to gemini outreach and I'm sure speak others in that 
sentiment. We may get things wrong, but I assure you all that our hearts 
are in the right place.

I'll be talking about gemini more on my channel, but I'd like to ask the 
list; are there are any specific things you'd like people to know, such 
as common misconceptions, or certain strengths gemini has? Is there any 
misinformation about gemini out there you feel might need correcting?


Chris Were

Link to individual message.

2. metalune (metalune (a) mailbox.org)

On Tue Feb 9, 2021 at 5:59 PM CET, Chris Were wrote:
> I'll be talking about gemini more on my channel, but I'd like to ask the
> list; are there are any specific things you'd like people to know, such
> as common misconceptions, or certain strengths gemini has? Is there any
> misinformation about gemini out there you feel might need correcting?
>
> *Don't forget to smash that like button,*
> Chris Were

I don't know about the others, but I for myself would like if you could
"shout out" some cool gemini capsules you found, either useful or just
fun. Might just be me tho :D

Link to individual message.

3. Thomas Adam (thomas (a) xteddy.org)

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:03:00PM +0100, metalune wrote:
> On Tue Feb 9, 2021 at 5:59 PM CET, Chris Were wrote:
> > I'll be talking about gemini more on my channel, but I'd like to ask the
> > list; are there are any specific things you'd like people to know, such
> > as common misconceptions, or certain strengths gemini has? Is there any
> > misinformation about gemini out there you feel might need correcting?
> >
> > *Don't forget to smash that like button,*
> > Chris Were
> 
> I don't know about the others, but I for myself would like if you could
> "shout out" some cool gemini capsules you found, either useful or just
> fun. Might just be me tho :D

And for that, see:

gemini://medusae.space/gemini://medusae.space/

-- Thomas

Link to individual message.

4. Chris Were (chriswere (a) posteo.net)

On 2021-02-09 17:03, metalune wrote:
> On Tue Feb 9, 2021 at 5:59 PM CET, Chris Were wrote:
>> I'll be talking about gemini more on my channel, but I'd like to ask 
>> the
>> list; are there are any specific things you'd like people to know, 
>> such
>> as common misconceptions, or certain strengths gemini has? Is there 
>> any
>> misinformation about gemini out there you feel might need correcting?
>> 
>> *Don't forget to smash that like button,*
>> Chris Were
> 
> I don't know about the others, but I for myself would like if you could
> "shout out" some cool gemini capsules you found, either useful or just
> fun. Might just be me tho :D

That's a great idea. Thank :-)

Link to individual message.

5. PJ vM (pjvm742 (a) disroot.org)

On 2/9/21 5:59 PM, Chris Were wrote:
> Hello Gemini mailing list,
> My name's Chris Were and I run a small PeerTube/YouTube.

Could you give a link to your Peertube channel? If anyone on this list
would want to give feedback on the Gemini content, I'm sure they would
phrase it kindly (because hey, you're here talking on the list) and
would send it privately.

> Please forgive any breach in protocol, I'm not used to mailing lists.

You're doing fine as far as I can tell.

> I noticed that YouTubers were mentioned as part of gemini outreach 
> and wanted to let you all know that I, for one, am incredibly
> excited to be part of this growing community of talented individuals.
> I'm no-where near as knowledgable as those on this list, but I'm 
> thoroughly enjoying learning about self-hosting and this amazing new 
> internet protocol.

That sounds great!

> I'm open to feedback as to how I might help grow the community, but I
> also understand there's a degree of animosity about YouTubers. I'd 
> just like to say that I really hope to be a constructive community 
> member when it comes to gemini outreach and I'm sure speak others in 
> that sentiment. We may get things wrong, but I assure you all that 
> our hearts are in the right place.

Not sure whether there's animosity against YTers per se...? In any
situation where you see someone explaining something when their
experience with / understanding of it is smaller than yours, it is a bit
weird.

I think there's a general acceptance that people can and will discuss
Gemini in any way they like, and that Gemini will become more widely
known to some extent. There is some disagreement about how popular
Gemini would ideally be, but at least I (and I hope most would agree)
think the popularity of Gemini is something that we should let go as it
goes.

> I'll be talking about gemini more on my channel, but I'd like to ask 
> the list; are there are any specific things you'd like people to 
> know, such as common misconceptions, or certain strengths gemini
> has? Is there any misinformation about gemini out there you feel
> might need correcting?

What metalune said, plus maybe the following two answers to common
reactions if you encounter those reactions frequently:

- section 2.5 of the FAQ
- to "But I would like to make things look nice": Gemini is focused on
text content, and the idea is that rather than the author determining
how they want readers to view it, the readers should determine how they
want to view it; and as it's text content, a reader probably wants to
view everything the same way.

-- 
pjvm

Link to individual message.

6. Chris Were (chriswere (a) posteo.net)

Thank you for the warm welcome, I can certainly provide links to my 
PeerTube content.

These are my tech videos on PeerTube
https://share.tube/video-channels/chrisweredigital/videos
and my full set of PeerTube content can be found at
https://share.tube/accounts/chriswere

I'm always happy to take feedback and suggestions - and thanks for your 
ideas in the last email.


On 2021-02-09 17:56, PJ vM wrote:
> On 2/9/21 5:59 PM, Chris Were wrote:
>> Hello Gemini mailing list,
>> My name's Chris Were and I run a small PeerTube/YouTube.
> 
> Could you give a link to your Peertube channel? If anyone on this list
> would want to give feedback on the Gemini content, I'm sure they would
> phrase it kindly (because hey, you're here talking on the list) and
> would send it privately.
> 
>> Please forgive any breach in protocol, I'm not used to mailing lists.
> 
> You're doing fine as far as I can tell.
> 
>> I noticed that YouTubers were mentioned as part of gemini outreach
>> and wanted to let you all know that I, for one, am incredibly
>> excited to be part of this growing community of talented individuals.
>> I'm no-where near as knowledgable as those on this list, but I'm
>> thoroughly enjoying learning about self-hosting and this amazing new
>> internet protocol.
> 
> That sounds great!
> 
>> I'm open to feedback as to how I might help grow the community, but I
>> also understand there's a degree of animosity about YouTubers. I'd
>> just like to say that I really hope to be a constructive community
>> member when it comes to gemini outreach and I'm sure speak others in
>> that sentiment. We may get things wrong, but I assure you all that
>> our hearts are in the right place.
> 
> Not sure whether there's animosity against YTers per se...? In any
> situation where you see someone explaining something when their
> experience with / understanding of it is smaller than yours, it is a 
> bit
> weird.
> 
> I think there's a general acceptance that people can and will discuss
> Gemini in any way they like, and that Gemini will become more widely
> known to some extent. There is some disagreement about how popular
> Gemini would ideally be, but at least I (and I hope most would agree)
> think the popularity of Gemini is something that we should let go as it
> goes.
> 
>> I'll be talking about gemini more on my channel, but I'd like to ask
>> the list; are there are any specific things you'd like people to
>> know, such as common misconceptions, or certain strengths gemini
>> has? Is there any misinformation about gemini out there you feel
>> might need correcting?
> 
> What metalune said, plus maybe the following two answers to common
> reactions if you encounter those reactions frequently:
> 
> - section 2.5 of the FAQ
> - to "But I would like to make things look nice": Gemini is focused on
> text content, and the idea is that rather than the author determining
> how they want readers to view it, the readers should determine how they
> want to view it; and as it's text content, a reader probably wants to
> view everything the same way.

Link to individual message.

7. metalune (metalune (a) mailbox.org)

On Tue Feb 9, 2021 at 5:59 PM CET, Chris Were wrote:
> any breach in protocol, I'm not used to mailing lists.

small tip, please add the response to an email at the *bottom*, it
represents the natural flow of a conversation whereas putting your
answer above the question would just reverse that. nothing really major,
just a note for the future :D

Link to individual message.

8. Stephane Bortzmeyer (stephane (a) sources.org)

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:56:33PM +0100,
 PJ vM <pjvm742 at disroot.org> wrote 
 a message of 59 lines which said:

> - section 2.5 of the FAQ

My experience with promoting Gemini is that, in almost every case, the
criticisms I hear against Gemini are addressed in the FAQ, section
2. And, most of the times, well addressed, in my opinion.

So, one could make an interesting video with each item of the FAQ.

gemini://gemini.circumlunar.space/docs/faq.gmi

Link to individual message.

9. Alexis (flexibeast (a) gmail.com)


Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane at sources.org> writes:

> My experience with promoting Gemini is that, in almost every 
> case, the
> criticisms I hear against Gemini are addressed in the FAQ, 
> section
> 2. And, most of the times, well addressed, in my opinion.

Indeed. i've encountered people discussing Gemini as something 
intended to supersede the Web, even though the opening text of 
gemini.circumlunar.space states:

> Gemini is a new internet protocol which:
>
>    Is heavier than gopher
>    Is lighter than the web
>    Will not replace either

and FAQ 1.4 states:

> 1.4 Do you really think you can replace the web?
>
> Not for a minute! Nor does anybody involved with Gemini want to 
> destroy Gopherspace. Gemini is not intended to replace either 
> Gopher or the web, but to co-exist peacefully alongside them as 
> one more option which people can freely choose to use if it 
> suits them.

That said, in terms of FAQ 1.1:

> You may think of Gemini as "the web, stripped right back to its 
> essence" or as "Gopher, souped up and modernised a little", 
> depending upon your perspective.

i prefer the latter perspective, as i think the former tends to 
encourage people to think of Gemini along the lines of, say, HTTP 
1.1 and HTML 3.2.


Alexis.

Link to individual message.

10. Jigme Datse (jigme.datse (a) datsemultimedia.com)

On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 19:47:17 +0100
"metalune" <metalune at mailbox.org> wrote:

> On Tue Feb 9, 2021 at 5:59 PM CET, Chris Were wrote:
> > any breach in protocol, I'm not used to mailing lists.  
> 
> small tip, please add the response to an email at the *bottom*, it
> represents the natural flow of a conversation whereas putting your
> answer above the question would just reverse that. nothing really
> major, just a note for the future :D

This is quite a significant peeve of mine.  Not so much what
individuals do, but rather that certain "support" products, or whatever
ignore everything below a certain point (if there's any indication that
the reply is at the bottom).  

I get why *people* are doing top posting.  I don't have a huge problem
with that.  What I do have a problem with, is when I spend time
responding meaningfully, and get a response, "your email came with no
content"...  

It's possible it did, I'm almost certain the *reason* it did, is
because you stripped anything from the first indication of a "quote"
section.

Link to individual message.

---

Previous Thread: Proposal to drop double slashes from URL syntax

Next Thread: gemini browsers