💾 Archived View for thatit.be › 2023-10-27-05-49-53.gmi captured on 2023-11-14 at 07:58:38. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
➡️ Next capture (2024-02-05)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
While wondering what the CLI equivalent of canvas-like organization would be I started playing with rg to find notes that are related by virtue of some content.
For example:
rg 'free will' 2023-10-23-14-25-33.md 3:title: free will write-offs 6:I dont have links, but I keep seeing mentions of how the lack of free will 19:their own (nonexistent) free will doesn't mean that reform is going to fail. 21:We can lack free will and be the products of a complex series of inputs 22:(perhaps a lack of free will would necessitate that, even.) The choice of a 26:I feel like Sam Harris gets [this part] right: A lack of free will should be 2023-03-26-02-58-45.md 3:title: disbelief in free will gives rise to compassion 7:The author believes that by conceding a belief in free will he has become more 2023-08-04-06-49-17.md 10:> that appears to leave no room for human free will or moral responsibility. 13:> attempted to get around the difficulty by defining free will as a voluntary 2023-03-30-07-38-35.md 22:existence of free will, as it seems like something that doesn't matter, but I'm 2022-03-26-16-04-20.md 9:The stoics defined free will as *a voluntary accommodation to what is in any
I can rg -l for just their names and feed that to bat.
bat $(rg -l 'free will')
It’s actually kind of a fun way to review notes, but it’s still just a wall of text. Maybe it’s good enough? Maybe it would be handy to make this retrievable/repeatable? It’s a bit like using the Telescope live_grep in Neovim, but being able to see all the results instead of just one hit at a time.
asciinema capture in webm format
updated: 2023-10-27 10:32:20
generated: 2023-11-11