💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 007676.gmi captured on 2023-11-14 at 08:25:15. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-09-08)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Byron Torres b at torresjrjr.com
Sun Dec 12 16:00:26 GMT 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12 Dec 2021 14:47:22 Michael Lazar <lazar.michael22 at gmail.com>:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 5:48 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
<stephane at sources.org> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 01:06:25PM -0500,
Michael Lazar <lazar.michael22 at gmail.com> wrote
a message of 75 lines which said:
Your best bet, if you're serious about this, is to go ahead and
implement your proposal in your client. If others find it useful
they will start using it too
I'm not sure it is something to recommend since it can leads to "de
facto" standards and to "best viewed with client XYZ
7" which were
one of the reasons we ran away from the Web.
Speak for yourself. De-facto standards are social proof that a subset
of the community actually wants and will use a feature. Which is much
more convincing to me than a loud minority arguing for (or against)
something based on principle alone.
Gemini is a principled project."social proof" is not proof, unqualified.
Gemini users vs everyone else is a minority.Numbers games are not effective without substance.