💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 007355.gmi captured on 2023-11-14 at 08:40:03. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

Gemini on Sourcehut (was Re: News----good, bad, ugly? You decide (was Re: [spec] comments on the proposed gemini spec revisions))

u9000 u9000 at posteo.mx

Fri Oct 22 20:01:40 BST 2021

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

On Fri, 2021-10-22 at 14:08 -0400, Adnan Maolood wrote:

On Fri Oct 22, 2021 at 12:57 PM EDT, René Wagner wrote:
That being said, i'd like to throw another suggestion in for discussion:
Because of this, I have taken the liberty of creating a project and bug
trackers on Sourcehut. I will be coping the Gitlab issues and
repositories today.
=
https://sr.ht/~u9000/gemini-specification/ Sourcehut project
Instead of moving to yet another source forge that caused emotional reactions
within the community for multiple times for different reasons,
we should go for self-hosting.
If there is any interest from the community i'd be happy to provide a gitea
instance especially focused on projects for gemini (not limited to the spec).
I've been running my own gitea instance for quite some time now [1] and i'm
maintaining geminispace.info, the widely used public search engine for gemini.
One of the benefits of using Sourcehut is that one does not need an
account to participate. Projects typically accept patches via email, and
the mailing lists and ticket trackers are open to anyone with an email
address.
Sourcehut can also be self-hosted if desired, though the process is
likely more involved than that for Gitea.

Gitea also has similar Javascript issues to Gitlab. Even without email,one can comfortably browse Sourcehut in Lynx. But thank you for offeringto host the project, René.

-- DJ ChaseThey, Them, Theirs