💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 007286.gmi captured on 2023-11-14 at 08:43:08. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Oliver Simmons oliversimmo at gmail.com
Mon Oct 11 13:51:50 BST 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 09:12, Omar Polo <op at omarpolo.com> wrote:
1. whitespace after gemtext elements
I don't have strong opinion on this, but on the other hand I don't see a
real motivation to require a space in your post nor in the gitlab
discussion. Whitespaces should not be mandatory if not strictly
required to separate fields (like in a link line) in my opinion at
least. But yes, I do always write '# hello there' and not '#hello
there'.
As someone who's making a basic gemini client, having the whitespacemakes it alot simpler, you can just split the line on the space and doa `switch` on the first part.Not having a space means you'd have to test if the line starts withdifferent things, which would be very annoying and slower in mostcases.
Having the whitespace is easier for clients, and also looks better.I see no downside to enforcing it in the spec (a SHOULD or MUST).
Taking this in slightly OT direction: in what manner should client
authors experiment with extensions in their clients? I know there isn't
a reply, if the project is mine I can do the hell I want with it, and
since most (all?) clients are free software I can take an existing one
and modify the hell out of it, and I'm grateful for this.
I know also the "don't extend gemini" mantra, and I repeat myself too.
Clients can do what the hell they like IMO, as long as things thattransmit over the net obey the spec.So gemtext is pretty unlimited, but making protocol requests isstrictly limited.Something like replacing `---` is entirely a client-side thing andaffects no one but the reader.
The spec is a baseline for a minimum working thing, there's a reasonalot of it is "SHOULD''/"MAY" rather than "MUST".
-Oliver Simmons (GoodClover)