💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006962.gmi captured on 2023-11-14 at 08:57:40. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rev. Fr. Robert Bower frrobert at frrobert.com
Wed Jul 28 21:33:12 BST 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This is an idea I have pondered for awhile and the deurbanizing thread got me thinking about it again.
Gemini document syntax in many ways uses a subset of markdown. The exception being the syntax for links.
Would it not be advantageous for content creators for Gemini to support both the standard Gemini syntax of =
for links and also support the []() markdown syntax for links, limited to links on their own line?
I also think it would be great if markdown also supported both syntaxes.
I am picturing a set of documents that could be delivered via Gemini as Gemini documents or delivered as markdown documents which then could be viewed as html or pdf.
This may just be crazy but I thought I would throw it out there.-------------- next part --------------A non-text attachment was scrubbed...Name: signature.ascType: application/pgp-signatureSize: 488 bytesDesc: not availableURL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20210728/8d918026/attachment.sig>