💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006371.gmi captured on 2023-11-14 at 09:25:31. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tom tgrom.automail at nuegia.net
Fri Apr 16 06:35:06 BST 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:51:33 +0000nervuri <nervuri at disroot.org> wrote:
Indeed, this might require clarification in the spec. There's no
reason to demand SNI if a raw IP address is used - as almaember
points out, RFC 6066 even forbids IP addresses in SNI. If a server
has multiple IP addresses, it can serve different certificates on
each of them without having to use SNI.
If we can going to mandate SNI can we at least mandate ESNI forprivacy? Maybe when we mandate TLS1.3 and drop 1.2.
Also, there's no reason for Gemini to require paying the DNS tax.
People should be able to host capsules without dealing with DNS.
OpenNIC still exists and I run my resolvers off them. No need to pay aDNS tax.
-- ______________________________________ / <Sanaya> you guys are all sick! sick \\ sick sick I tell ya ;) / -------------------------------------- \ \ /\ /\ //\\_//\\ ____ \_ _/ / / / * * \ /^^^] \_\O/_/ [ ] / \_ [ / \ \_ / / [ [ / \/ _/ _[ [ \ /_/