💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006186.gmi captured on 2023-11-14 at 09:33:13. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
almaember almaember at disroot.org
Thu Mar 25 09:08:34 GMT 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:56:05 +0100Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane at sources.org> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:16:27PM +0100,
almaember <almaember at disroot.org> wrote
a message of 21 lines which said:
There are vague plans to submit Gemini to the IETF and get a RFC. As
of now, it seems a very distant project. In the mean time, there is
work going on to get a proper specification, you can follow it at
<https://gitlab.com/gemini-specification/>.
I've heard about the specs, that would be better than the current one.
I certainly hope that closed organisations like ISO or IEEE won't be
used.
Can I ask why? I mean they can cause a problem with evolving standardsbut since Gemini will be frozen anyway I don't see the specific problem.