💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 005836.gmi captured on 2023-11-14 at 09:49:38. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Sean Conner sean at conman.org
Tue Mar 2 00:52:41 GMT 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
It was thus said that the Great Petite Abeille once stated:
On Mar 1, 2021, at 22:09, Sean Conner <sean at conman.org> wrote:
My current thinking is a switch to IRI once some details are ironed out.
Fantastic.
Second question: is there any reasonable way to decouple the Transport
Layer Security requirement from the Gemini protocol itself?
Short answer: no.
Long anser: If you want to explore alternative transport securitymethods, go to town with an implementation, get the crypto community to passit and *then* present it to the Gemini community. At that point, thediscussion can commence.
One of the primary motivations of Gemini was adding TLS to gopher, and toavoid the whole http: vs https: that infests the web.
-spc