💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 005753.gmi captured on 2023-11-14 at 09:53:02. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

[spec] mercury highlights ☿️

Alex // nytpu alex at nytpu.com

Sun Feb 28 20:21:05 GMT 2021

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

On 2021-02-28 10:53PM, Ben wrote:

Any reason why port 1958 is chosen? I was thinking if it's adjacent to
Gemini (minus TLS) then why not something like 1964? Not unlike XMPP's use
of 5222 and 5223.The same reason Gemini uses 1965: Project Mercury was created in 1958.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Mercury

As for the rest of it, I belive it's kind of silly. Solderpunk didn'tcome up with Mercury as some sort of alternative where they're giving upon Gemini, they posed it as a hypothetical point of comparison between avery simple protocol like Mercury and something more complex likeGemini. It was never meant to be taken as serious new protocolproposal, they use it as a marker for another possible position on the"complexity axis" between Gopher and the web. Gemini is one point onthat "axis," Mercury is another possible point, used as a referencebeacon to help keep Gemini in-scope.

~nytpu

-- Alex // nytpualex at nytpu.comGPG Key: https://www.nytpu.com/files/pubkey.ascKey fingerprint: 43A5 890C EE85 EA1F 8C88 9492 ECCD C07B 337B 8F5Bhttps://useplaintext.email/-------------- next part --------------A non-text attachment was scrubbed...Name: signature.ascType: application/pgp-signatureSize: 833 bytesDesc: not availableURL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20210228/dd328cb6/attachment.sig>