💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 005107.gmi captured on 2023-11-14 at 10:19:34. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
PJ vM pjvm742 at disroot.org
Tue Feb 9 20:26:45 GMT 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On 2/9/21 8:57 PM, Daniel Nagy wrote:
Also, to my understanding removing them does not violate the standard. For
example, `tel:+1-816-555-1212` and `magnet:?xt=urn:sha1:...` are valid
URIs.They are valid URIs, because these schemes do not use the "authority"component of the URI syntax. The authority is for the hostname, port,and userinfo. The double slash is grouped with the authority componentand is required by the URI standard to be present when the authoritycomponent is used and to be absent when it is not used. Gemini URIsalways need to specify the hostname, so there is always an authoritycomponent, and to be standard-compliant the double slash cannot be left out.
-- pjvm