💾 Archived View for spam.works › mirrors › textfiles › ufo › infoclas.txt captured on 2023-11-14 at 12:30:49.
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-06-16)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The following is a listing of classifications / descriptions used in various
'ufo' texts and classification systems...
SIGHTING CLASSIFICATIONS
Below are the classifications of various types of UFO reports according to
proximity and activity. Suggested by J. Hynek & used by the Computer UFO
Network.
>LONG RANGE SIGHTINGS :farther than 500ft. distant from ufo:.
+LRS-DD: Daylight Disk
+LRS-NL: Nocturnal Lights
+LRS-RV: Radar & Visual
>CLOSE ENCOUNTERS :within 500ft from ufo:
+First Kind <CE-1>: Simple sighting of an object/ufo.
+Second Kind<CE-2>: Object interacts with the environment (including
electromagnetic effects, ground traces, radiation,
animal excitement.
+Third Kind <CE-3>: Witness sights occupants in or around UFO.
+Fourth Kind<CE-4>: Occupants communicate with witness in some way.
+Fifth Kind <CE-5>: Abduction of witness.
STRANGENESS AND PROBABILITY RATINGS
This is a 5 point rating system used by Paranet BBS's of the National
Fringe Sciences information Service to help establish the credibility of
sighting reports.These ratings are NOT used by CUFON, which does not
speculate.
*1. Explained or Explainable.
*2. Probably Explainable, with more data.
*3. Possibly Explainable, but with elements/ strangeness.
*4. Stange, does not conform with the norm.
*5. Highly strange, definately indicative of intelligent guidance.
EXAMPLES:
S1-Weather balloons, meteor, bolides, aircraft, etc..
S2-Experimental aircraft, celestial object(planet/star/).
S3-Slow, low flying object in formation.
S4-Bol (ball of light phenomena) physical traces.
S5-Close encounters,Abductions.
>PROBABILITY FACTOR/ #
Relates to the credibility, # & separation of witnesses and the
soundness of evidence.
*1-Not credible or sound.
*2-Unreliable, probably a hoax.
*3-Somewhat credible or indeterminate.
*4-Credible and sound.
*5-Highly credible, no doubt.
EXAMPLES:
*P1-Known hoaxer; photo hoax.
*P2-Repeat witness;conflicting testimony.
*P3-Standard,first time witness ;some radiation reading.
*P4-Multiple witnesses; pilot; good photo.
*P5-National figure, mutiple independent witnesses, videotape
Composite Stangeness/Probability Rating of a case involves of
the combined S/P factors.
EXAMPLES:
S1-Wickenburg, AZ; July 10
S2/P5-X-shaped UFO,Petaluma, CA
S4/P5-Brazillian ping pong ball
S5/P4-Betty & Barney Hill
S4/P4-Lubbock lights
S5/P5-Helicopter (Coyne case)
S3/P2-Delphos