💾 Archived View for eir.mooo.com › nuacht › lui169989660210.gmi captured on 2023-11-14 at 08:01:58. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
David Hurley, 13 Nov
A PENSIONER from County Limerick who repeatedly abused his two
granddaughters is to serve the remainder of his 11-year prison sentence
after his conviction was upheld by the Court of Appeal.
In July of last year, serial abuser Patrick Shanahan, aged 76, of
Cooga, Doon was convicted by a unanimous jury, at Limerick Circuit
Criminal Court, of 14 counts of sexually assaulting Daria and Tara
Tobin on dates between 2010 and 2014.
He had pleaded not guilty to all counts.
Daria and Tara waived their own right to anonymity last year so
Shanahan could be named.
The court heard the abuse involved the rubbing of the girls' vaginas
and later moved on to vaginal penetration by insertion of his finger
and tongue when the girls were aged between 10 and 14.
The abuse occurred in the appellant's own home, on nearby land and
property as well as in his van on local journeys.
Shanahan had appealed his convictions on the grounds of delay and
alleged inconsistencies in one of the complaints, as well as arguing
that evidence on how the abuse was disclosed should not have gone
before the jury.
In delivering judgement at the Court of Appeal this Monday, Ms Justice
Úna Ní Raifeartaigh said the court found that all three conditions for
the admissibility of the complaint were satisfied and she said the
court was of the view that the trial judge was correct in ruling the
evidence admissible.
At a previous hearing of the appeal, Anthony Sammon SC for Shanahan,
said the appeal was based on the time passed between the offending and
the girls' complaint to their aunt and then to gardaí.
[ilim-stock-Limerick_Courthouse_Mulgrave_Street_11-1697564780364.jpg--l
imerick_pensioner_appeals_convictions_over_repeated_abuse_of_his_two_gr
anddaughters.jpg?1697564782167]
Limerick pensioner appeals convictions over repeated abuse of his two
granddaughters
Counsel said the appeal was also grounded in the "inconsistency" of one
complaint and that questions of a leading or a suggestive nature could
have been used by their aunt in making her inquiries.
In relation to the issue of delay, Ms Justice Ní Raifeartaigh said the
question of whether the complaint was made at the first reasonable
opportunity in this case was not merely a question of the period of
time involved but of the evidence as a whole.
She said the court found that there was “ample evidence” in this case
that the complainants felt unable to make a proper complaint at an
earlier stage in their lives.
She said it was an important point to note that the courts have become
more aware of the psychological impact of sexual offending.
“The Irish courts in judicial review proceedings have long since
accepted that there are complex psychological reasons for delays in
making complaints of sexual abuse,” she commented.
The judge noted that the evidence was that the alleged abuse took place
when the complainants were children and that the appellant, their
grandfather, spent a lot of time in their company because the
grandparents spent time caring for the children.
She said in this setting, it would not be surprising to find that a
child would find it difficult to complain about what was happening.
The judge said the first complainant gave evidence that because of
parental issues of deafness and other problems she knew she would have
to carry the burden of disclosure alone and without support and felt
unable to do so until she had reached the age of majority.
In addition, she said, the second complainant was depressed, suicidal
and self-harming.
“It is hard to think of more compelling evidence to suggest that her
mental state was not one of sufficient strength to make a disclosure of
what had happened to her before the occasion upon which the full
disclosure was actually made to the aunt,” said the judge.
Ms Justice Ní Raifeartaigh said in the circumstances, and on the basis
of the specific evidence in this case, the court had “no difficulty” in
concluding that the complaint made by the two complainants to their
aunt fell within the parameters of the requirement of a complaint made
at the first reasonable opportunity.
Mr Sammon had also submitted that, in relation to the aunt's
questioning, the complaint may "not be a voluntary one" if questions of
a suggestive or leading character were used".
Mr Sammon said the aunt asked Tara "Is it something to do with Paddy
[Shanahan]?" and "You need to tell me what's going on".
After Tara said it was not to do with her boyfriend or her friends, she
confirmed Shanahan was abusing her.
Addressing this issue today, the judge said it was clear that the
aunt’s questioning was taking place in a context where she already knew
that the younger child was troubled about something and was ready to
make some kind of disclosure.
“This emerges from the evidence that the older sister told the aunt ‘I
think she will now’ in response to a question by the aunt as to whether
the younger sister would talk to her about what was troubling her,”
said Ms Justice Ní Raifeartaigh.
“The younger sister also gave evidence that she and her sister had
decided to tell the aunt that day.
She said in those circumstances, the aunt in effect, merely assisted
her in saying something which she herself wished to say, and did so by
asking about a series of possibilities, the last of which concerned the
appellant.
The judge said the court concluded that the evidence fell within the
parameters of the voluntariness requirement of the recent complaint
doctrine.
In relation to the issue of consistency, the judge said the appellant’s
argument appeared to be that the terms of the complaint made to the
aunt were inconsistent with the evidence at trial that the first
complainant had denied being sexually assaulted by the appellant on one
particular occasion when her mother asked her about it.
[ilim-stock-Garda_stock_image_Nov_2022_8-1699890883989.jpg--investigati
on_launched_after_car_is_set_alight_in_limerick_estate.jpg?169989088579
5]
Investigation launched after car is set alight in Limerick estate
Ms Justice Ní Raifeartaigh said there had been evidence that in
September 2016, the first complainant had been questioned by her mother
and denied having been sexually assaulted.
However, she said the complainant’s own evidence at the trial was that,
although she had chosen not to tell her parents at the time because of
their personal challenges, she had been sexually assaulted by the
appellant.
“Thus, the court does not see any inconsistency between her evidence
(that she was sexually assaulted) at the trial, and the complaint made
to her aunt,” said the judge.
“The court concludes that the third condition of consistency between
the complaint to the aunt and the evidence of the complainants at trial
was therefore established,” she added.