💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 000906.gmi captured on 2023-11-04 at 13:11:34. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Gday Maybe I am jumping the gun and over reacting Did anyone look at Chris McGee Gemini site It links back to schema.org https://schema.org/docs/about.html https://schema.org/ " Founded by Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Yandex" " Schema.org vocabularies are developed by an open community process, using the public-schemaorg at w3.org mailing list and through GitHub." Do we really want another open code project and another group subverted by Corporations, Patents, Royalities and those who are against Free Speech and Freedom ? I really hope Gemini doesnt go down the same route as Firefox, Linux Foundation, Ansilbe and so many others because they allow anyone into X group to push their adjenda, surbvert it kick out the original team/founders and push Anti free Speech, Anti Merit,etc It seems the whole open source community has been weaked and subverted to support Corporations speech code restrictions Closed Source code/drivers/kernals Telemary, data collecting, spying on users Most refuse to address that Python and java are crap and so much software is delibery forcing requirements of pythlon, dotnet, java, gnome, systemd, dbus, pulse,etc into it turning linux into windows centralised depant junkware Just this week/month we have seen another open code project sold to a corporation surbverted and ruined - Audacity Why is open code software allowed to transfer to corporations in the first place ? I really hope Gemini can stay to the hardcore roots and not become bloated web 2nd edition __________________ Regards Charliebrownau charliebrownau at protonmail.com Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ??????? Original Message ??????? On Wednesday, May 19, 2021 11:00 AM, <gemini-request at lists.orbitalfox.eu> wrote: > Send Gemini mailing list submissions to > gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/listinfo/gemini > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > gemini-request at lists.orbitalfox.eu > > You can reach the person managing the list at > gemini-owner at lists.orbitalfox.eu > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Gemini digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. [users] Introducing gemthought, a format for micro gemlogging > (Chris McGee) > > 2. Re: [users] Introducing gemthought, a format for micro > gemlogging (Nathan Galt) > > 3. Re: Opening of the first modules a new Gemini station > (Frank J?des) > > 4. Re: [users] Introducing gemthought, a format for micro > gemlogging (prx) > > 5. Re: [tech] Integrity checks for Gemini pages (ew.gemini) > > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 21:00:16 -0400 > From: Chris McGee newton688 at gmail.com > To: gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu > Subject: [users] Introducing gemthought, a format for micro gemlogging > Message-ID: > CAOk9ws3-r=KTH=92d1BejubAP_AsPdaQPc+8NByhgyU66jz9OA at mail.gmail.com > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello All, > > I've been finding that the drive to write lengthy articles, rfcs and > gemlogs has been keeping me from writing anything at all in my gemini > capsule. Drawing inspiration from micro-blogging platforms that I use > regularly I started writing gemthoughts, which are meant to be really > short, simple and approachable so that I will hopefully do this more often. > > I've started publishing them here: > gemini://lonelysilo.ca/gemthought > > A draft description of the format with some semantics can be found here: > gemini://lonelysilo.ca/rfc/gemthought.gmi > > Cheers, > Chris
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 13:53, charliebrownau <charliebrownau at protonmail.com> wrote: > Gday > Maybe I am jumping the gun and over reacting > > Did anyone look at Chris McGee Gemini site > It links back to schema.org > https://schema.org/docs/about.html > https://schema.org/ > > " Founded by Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and Yandex" > " Schema.org vocabularies are developed by an open community process, > using the public-schemaorg at w3.org mailing list and through GitHub." > > I think you are perhaps over reacting. Schema.org is not an official part of Gemini. People can link to whatever URLs they choose. Otherwise we all have our own taste about preferred technology. The main thing is to get the interoperability the way we want in Gemini to keep it simple. I doubt whether there is much potential interest from large corporate entities given Gemini is so limited compared to the web, where they have the full gamut of cookies, tracking, embedded video, javascript etc. - Luke
On Wed, 19 May 2021 12:53:10 +0000 charliebrownau <charliebrownau at protonmail.com> wrote: > Do we really want another open code project and another group subverted > by Corporations, Patents, Royalities and those who are against Free Speech and Freedom ? What's the nature of the subversion in this instance? As far as I can see these are versioned standards. Moreover, this is not an official part of the Gemini specification. The author is indeed using his free speech and freedom to publish what he thinks is a good idea for Gemini publishing metadata. You don't have to agree but that's what freedom entails. > Why is open code software allowed to transfer to corporations in the first place ? "Open source" refers to licenses that allow you to copy and modify the licensed work, not to the ownership or commercial nature of the software, nor the management of the development process. If you don't like the Audacity/Firefox projects you can copy the source code and distribute a fork. This is pretty much the only thing "open source" implies. -- Philip
> If you don't like the Audacity/Firefox projects > you can copy the source code and > distribute a fork. This is pretty much the only thing "open > source" implies. It also means that they don't limit what you're allowed to use the software for.
---
Previous Thread: [users] Introducing gemthought, a format for micro gemlogging