💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 000699.gmi captured on 2023-11-04 at 13:03:02. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hello, everyone. I am new to this community and I intend to run my capsule in a kubernetes cluster on my existing rpi4 infra. As part of the CI/CD process for my production launch, I need a mechanism (like git) for source code control. Before I recreate the wheel, does such a thing exist already? -sba [sailboat-anon](https://github.com/sailboat-anon) @ gh | gemini://sailboat-anon.space/ (launching tomorrow!)
Am Sa, 13. Feb 2021, um 22:34, schrieb sailboatanon: > Hello, everyone. I am new to this community and I intend to run my capsule in a kubernetes cluster on my existing rpi4 infra. As part of the CI/CD process for my production launch, I need a mechanism (like git) for source code control. > > Before I recreate the wheel, does such a thing exist already? > -sba Why not use git?
Indeed, we just had a helpful thread on this, and here's what I implemented a moment ago on my capsule - it's simple: - Gemini server (agate, in my case) running in Docker - Static mount in the container at run-time to /var/capsule on my host, which is actually a cloned git repo folder. - Cronjob on the host to pull the main branch every five minutes or whatever to keep the /var/capsule directory up to date. You can use post receive hooks too, that would be basically the same. >> Link to the container definition for the Agage docker:?https://github.com/davidemerson/nnix.com-gemini Regards, David Feb 13, 2021, 17:05 by louis at brauer.family: > Am Sa, 13. Feb 2021, um 22:34, schrieb sailboatanon: > >> Hello, everyone.? I am new to this community and I intend to run my capsule in a kubernetes cluster on my existing rpi4 infra.? As part of the CI/CD process for my production launch, I need a mechanism (like git) for source code control. >> >> Before I recreate the wheel, does such a thing exist already? >> -sba >> > > Why not use git? >
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 09:34:25PM +0000, sailboatanon <sailboatanon at protonmail.com> wrote a message of 39 lines which said: > I intend to run my capsule in a kubernetes cluster on my existing > rpi4 infra. It is interesting to see Gemini, intended to be a simple and lightweight protocol, running on such a humongous beast like Kubernetes.
On Feb 13, 2021, 23:36, Stephane Bortzmeyer < stephane at sources.org> wrote: > It is interesting to see Gemini, intended to be a simple and lightweight protocol, running on such a humongous beast like Kubernetes. Gemini is a toy protocol. There are two things nerds do with toy protocols: port them to ever smaller hardware, and perform a reductio ad absurdam of overengineering a deployment. Gemini on Kubernetes (and Kubernetes on Raspberry Pis in general!) is a joke, in the fine tradition of Enterprise Grade Fizzbuzz. Personally, I can't wait for some crazy bastard to write a Gemini server in Motorola 68000 assembly for the Amiga.
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 07:48:53AM +0000, Jonathan Lane <jon at dorsal.tk> wrote a message of 38 lines which said: > Personally, I can't wait for some crazy bastard to write a Gemini > server in Motorola 68000 assembly for the Amiga. TLS will certainly create interesting challenges. (Unicode, too.)
This is exactly the reason I chose this project :) Gemini is simple, small-scale. K8s is unfathomable enterprise-scale. I have a 'personal cloud' at home - 4 RPis running clusters of DNS, DHCP, SMTP, and now Gemini. If anyone is interested, it's open source (but WIP): https://github.com/sailboat-anon/mintranet/wiki/Features---Toolset I'll be releasing the Docker buildfiles and source for my gemini server to this community in the coming days. Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. ??????? Original Message ??????? On Saturday, February 13, 2021 11:48 PM, Jonathan Lane <jon at dorsal.tk> wrote: > On Feb 13, 2021, 23:36, Stephane Bortzmeyer < stephane at sources.org> wrote: >> It is interesting to see Gemini, intended to be a simple and lightweight protocol, running on such a humongous beast like Kubernetes. > > Gemini is a toy protocol. There are two things nerds do with toy protocols: port them to ever smaller hardware, and perform a reductio ad absurdam of overengineering a deployment. Gemini on Kubernetes (and Kubernetes on Raspberry Pis in general!) is a joke, in the fine tradition of Enterprise Grade Fizzbuzz. > > Personally, I can't wait for some crazy bastard to write a Gemini server in Motorola 68000 assembly for the Amiga.
Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane at sources.org> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 07:48:53AM +0000, > Jonathan Lane <jon at dorsal.tk> wrote > a message of 38 lines which said: > > > Personally, I can't wait for some crazy bastard to write a Gemini > > server in Motorola 68000 assembly for the Amiga. > > TLS will certainly create interesting challenges. (Unicode, too.) > AmiSSL[1] has full compatibility with the latest OpenSSL, requires 68020 or higher and AmigaOS 3 or higher. The crypto itself would still take a long time. There also exist a unicode library called Ucode[2]. But since I discovered it when writing this email, I don't know if it's usable for such a project. Keeping up with the new Unicode versions is a project of itself. While on the Amiga programming topic, I've been spending one or two hours every Saturday evening (just a few weeks in a row) teaching myself Amiga E. Inspired by Amiga E's 32 bit chars and AmiSSL for Amiga E[3], I've started to write a gemtext parser (ASCII only at first, then Latin1 characters in UTF-8) in the hope I can add enough features to eventually call it a gemini client. I wouldn't attempt doing it in M68k assembly, though. [1] http://aminet.net/package/util/libs/AmiSSL-4.7 [2] http://aminet.net/package/text/show/Ucode [3] http://aminet.net/package/dev/e/AmiSSL_in_E -- Katarina . o O (we might have strayed a bit from the topic) >
You'd only need Ucode if you were writing a client; a server doesn't have to display anything. And Unicode only grows by adding new characters: existing ones never get removed and most of their properties don't change either, so keeping up actually isn't that hard. On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 9:15 PM Katarina Eriksson <gmym at coopdot.com> wrote: > Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane at sources.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 07:48:53AM +0000, >> Jonathan Lane <jon at dorsal.tk> wrote >> a message of 38 lines which said: >> >> > Personally, I can't wait for some crazy bastard to write a Gemini >> > server in Motorola 68000 assembly for the Amiga. >> >> TLS will certainly create interesting challenges. (Unicode, too.) >> > > AmiSSL[1] has full compatibility with the latest OpenSSL, requires 68020 > or higher and AmigaOS 3 or higher. The crypto itself would still take a > long time. > > There also exist a unicode library called Ucode[2]. But since I discovered > it when writing this email, I don't know if it's usable for such a project. > Keeping up with the new Unicode versions is a project of itself. > > While on the Amiga programming topic, I've been spending one or two hours > every Saturday evening (just a few weeks in a row) teaching myself Amiga E. > > Inspired by Amiga E's 32 bit chars and AmiSSL for Amiga E[3], I've started > to write a gemtext parser (ASCII only at first, then Latin1 characters in > UTF-8) in the hope I can add enough features to eventually call it a gemini > client. > > I wouldn't attempt doing it in M68k assembly, though. > > [1] http://aminet.net/package/util/libs/AmiSSL-4.7 > > [2] http://aminet.net/package/text/show/Ucode > > [3] http://aminet.net/package/dev/e/AmiSSL_in_E > > -- > Katarina . o O (we might have strayed a bit from the topic) > >>
---
Previous Thread: Trying to learn CGI, please help, total newbie lost