šŸ’¾ Archived View for idiomdrottning.org ā€ŗ dagger-dagger captured on 2023-11-04 at 11:04:53. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

āž”ļø Next capture (2024-02-05)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Dagger Dagger

Traditional footnotes order is asterisk*, daggerā€ , and double daggerā€”, with some medievalist using a tripple dagger after that. I use a double asterisk** (I deliberately use two ASCII asterisks** instead of a double asterisk glyphā‘) as my level two, so I have *, **, ā€  and ā€” as four levels.

I just prefer having two asterisks that way, I think that looks fine enough and it keeps it ASCII clean and it introduces a liā€™l hurdle for me to make me less likely to have three or four footnotes in whatā€™s supposed to be a quick message.

If I need more than four Iā€™ll just put them on a second page or use numbers instead.

This mostly goes for chat (like IRC and XMPP) and email and on my Tinylog since in books and HTML I can use sidenotes instead which donā€™t need any superscript glyphs. And in the contexts where I do use this stuff, I donā€™t bother with trying to superscript them or even mark them up in any kind of semantic or style, and same goes for the footnote text itself. I just literally jam the note character inline with the text and start the ā€œfootnoteā€ with that character followed by a colon.

This is a liā€™l wonky accessibility-wise but these protocols are already limited enough in what they can do.

I also never do here on my Gemini capsule (except for on the Tinylog), I donā€™t even do asterisks for bold on there, my Gemini philosophy is that text should deliberately be more calm and unadorned.

A philosophy that only applies to my own stuff. Donā€™t take this as me trying to be a snob about how other people write. ā™„