💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006037.gmi captured on 2023-11-04 at 13:34:25. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Artur Honzawa arturh at gmail.com
Wed Mar 10 08:45:07 GMT 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Makes sense. Would security be impacted if clients applied TOFU and refusedto downgrade if they had previously established a secure connection?
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:33 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer <stephane at sources.org>wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 09:18:14AM +0100,
Artur Honzawa <arturh at gmail.com> wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
Add gemini-plaintext: schema for servers without TLS support.
Each time you have two security levels (encrypted and unencrypted),
besides added complexity, you have the problem of downgrade attacks
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downgrade_attack>. These attacks have
plagued all protocols with both an encrypted nd unencrypted version
(SMTP…), that's why HTTP/3 (and Gemini!) only have one version.
-------------- next part --------------An HTML attachment was scrubbed...URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20210310/390b24c5/attachment.htm>