💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 000252.gmi captured on 2023-11-04 at 12:36:15. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Just curious as to how those of you with gemlogs are making your atom feeds? ~ Parker -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Good question! The majority of people are probably using Solderpunk's gemfeed, which can be installed with pip. https://tildegit.org/solderpunk/gemfeed It works well with CAPCOM, which is the main use of it that I've seen. A minority of people might also be writing the feeds by hand, or using some custom script. makeworld ??????? Original Message ??????? On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 6:15 PM, Parker <pellertson at firemail.cc> wrote: > Just curious as to how those of you with gemlogs are making your atom feeds? > > ~ Parker > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:15:14 -0700 Parker <pellertson at firemail.cc> wrote: > Just curious as to how those of you with gemlogs are making your atom > feeds? I have feeds, but I've been doing them manually. -- Matthew Graybosch gemini://starbreaker.org #include <disclaimer.h> gemini://demifiend.org https://matthewgraybosch.com gemini://tanelorn.city "Out of order?! Even in the future nothing works."
On 6/25/20 1:15 PM, Matthew Graybosch wrote: >> Just curious as to how those of you with gemlogs are making your atom >> feeds? > I have feeds, but I've been doing them manually. I just added one on ~fox the other day. It's done by hand.
Parker writes: > Just curious as to how those of you with gemlogs are making your atom feeds? My server supports extension scripts in Scheme, and the atom feed generator is one of those. Tim
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:45:42PM +0000, colecmac at protonmail.com wrote: > The majority of people are probably using Solderpunk's gemfeed, which > can be installed with pip. > Probably - we could certainly do with more variety around this topic. An early gemlog post suggested that static site generators don't have much place in Gemini: gemini://gemini.circumlunar.space/users/fgaz/posts/2020-05-08-staticgens/ I actually don't agree with this - there's plenty of interesting and useful stuff that static site engines could automate the production of, and Atom feeds (including fine-rained feeds for, e.g., different categories of posts) is a great example. Cheers, Solderpunk
On Thursday 25 June 2020 17:55, solderpunk <solderpunk at SDF.ORG> wrote: > I actually don't agree with this - there's plenty of interesting and > useful stuff that static site engines could automate the production of, > and Atom feeds (including fine-rained feeds for, e.g., different > categories of posts) is a great example. - tag classification - production of external pgp signature per document - creation of synthetic report for GUS to avoid redundant network download I like the work one, serve many of static sites.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 05:11:24PM +0000, defdefred wrote: > - tag classification > - production of external pgp signature per document > - creation of synthetic report for GUS to avoid redundant network download > > I like the work one, serve many of static sites. > Yes, these are also all fine ideas. There still hasn't been any discussion yet of whether we want/need something like sitemap.xml in Geminispace. Cheers, Solderpunk
---