💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › skyjake › 4384 captured on 2023-09-28 at 18:50:47. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-09-08)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
If Gemtext feels too restrictive, I suggest authoring your text in some other format that feels right to you. You can and should serve content in multiple formats on your capsule, if you feel that's necessary to preserve the proper formatting.
'text/gemini' is the common denominator that all clients can understand and that situation is unlikely to change, so using any other format will limit people's chances to read your content. That's why serving the same content in multiple formats is the best compromise I can see. The reader can then choose which format works best for them in their client.
Of course, the practical cost of this is that you'll need an automated way to convert between formats.
2023-08-18 · 6 weeks ago
Thanks @skyjake :)
Gemtext is nevertheless my favourite format by far, so I don't think I'll branch out.
HTML has such ugly defaults that there is strong incentive to customize the style, and then you're immediately making choices that won't match anyone else's.
But Gemtext very nearly succeeds in making it about the structure and the text. Apart from emphasis ;)
text/gemini+ — I randomly found this webpage today while I was researching some old software libraries. It stuck out to me because how the page was structured, it felt very similar to what I see in gemini documents. I feel like this could represent the next "logical step" for text/gemini for all the people who say "I like text/gemini, but I just wish it had...". text/gemini + inline hyperlinks/bold/italics. Nothing else changed (pretend you didn't see the image). I have to say, it looks...
💬 mozz · 9 comments · 2 likes · 2023-08-17 · 6 weeks ago · #markup