💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 007420.gmi captured on 2023-09-28 at 16:23:32. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

A proposal to freeze the Gemini specification

remyabel at tilde.team remyabel at tilde.team

Tue Oct 26 00:56:56 BST 2021

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 01:12:37AM +0200, almaember wrote:

I hoped to not have to say it like this, I wanted to hide behind formal language and politeness, but I don't care about his opinion at all. He owns a website and a capsule, that's all. He didn't write the implementations and the capsules. He can do whatever he wants with his website, but for the rest, let the community decide. And the community has pretty much settled on the original spec, so...
The difference to other standards is that we have no versions. When the C standards committee (which, by the way, has representatives of the major implementations), they release a new revision, but don't retroactively change anything. That's not possible with Gemini.

The C standard is an ISO standard. Gemini is not. So the comparisondoesn't make sense, especially with the committee comment.