💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006377.gmi captured on 2023-09-28 at 16:48:35. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
nervuri nervuri at disroot.org
Fri Apr 16 13:23:17 BST 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
https://gitlab.com/gemini-specification/protocol/-/issues/33
See makeworld's comments. It looks like "no SNI" is the right answerfor IP addresses.
On Fri, 2021-04-16, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
gemini://2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1/
gemini://[2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1]:1965/
No. The first one is not a legal URL.
Thanks, I stand corrected. Indeed, Agunua points out that the first URLis invalid, but connects to the second one.
The clients I tested which didn't accept the second URL are:- Lagrange- gmni- bombadillo- Mozz web proxy - https://portal.mozz.us/gemini/%5B2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1%5D:1965/- gemini://celehner.com/proxy/ - https://celehner.com/gemini://[2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1]:1965/- https://gemini.susa.net:1993/proxy.html
However, most clients accept the host without the scheme and behavior issometimes inconsistent. For instance, in Amfora:- "89.47.164.70" works- "[2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1]" works if it is supplied from the command line, but not from within the program.- "2a02:7b40:592f:a446::1" - same as the above
Agunua and Kristall adhere to the RFC, so they connect to the first two,but not the third.