💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006337.gmi captured on 2023-09-28 at 16:49:27. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jason McBrayer jmcbray at carcosa.net
Tue Apr 13 14:56:46 BST 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Michael Lazar writes:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:59 AM Jason McBrayer <jmcbray at carcosa.net> wrote:
Stéphane Bortzmeyer writes:
So I do not really see why someone would like to use exotic TLS
libraries without Ed25519.
Do we have a list of which libraries do not include Ed25519?
portal.mozz.us is using openssl 1.0.2k from the Centos 7 repo [0],
which is still supported, but old enough that it doesn't include
ed25519.
Yeah, that doesn't surprise me too much. I am a little surprised thatit's newer (1.1.1d) in Debian stable, but it's probably just a releasecycle thing. It looks like ed25519 support appears in OpenSSL 1.1.1.
-- Jason McBrayer | “Strange is the night where black stars rise,jmcbray at carcosa.net | and strange moons circle through the skies, | but stranger still is lost Carcosa.” | ― Robert W. Chambers,The King in Yellow