💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006173.gmi captured on 2023-09-28 at 16:53:11. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jordan jordan at crowesnest.io
Thu Mar 25 02:13:02 GMT 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Eh, I couldnt care less if it does or not. What would the big benefits be if it does?
-------- Original Message --------On Mar 24, 2021, 6:16 PM, almaember wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering. Right now, Gemini uses a non-registered protocol
schema (gemini://) and a non-registered MIME-type (text/gemini).
The specification is a self-identified "pseudo-specification", and is
often not specific enough, leading to a number of de facto standards,
and the main website took a descriptive approach, and simply
collected[1] these "standards".
I understand that this is a very young protocol, but I wanted to post
this question anyway. Do you think Gemini will ever become a standard?
Even if not a standard published by a big organization like the ISO,
ECMA, IETF or IEEE, will text/gemini and the gemini url scheme ever be
registered with the IANA?
Cheers,
almaember
[1]: https://gemini.circumlunar.space/docs/best-practices.gmi-------------- next part --------------An HTML attachment was scrubbed...URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20210325/43c37e4a/attachment.htm>