💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 005539.gmi captured on 2023-09-28 at 17:08:27. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
CĂ´me Chilliet come at chilliet.eu
Tue Feb 23 20:07:32 GMT 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Le mardi 23 février 2021, 18:21:47 CET Oliver Simmons a écrit :
At current the Gemini spec is dual-purpose, it describes the protocol,
and the text/gemini format.
Whilst gemtext is the "native" format for Gemini (as HTML is to HTTP),
one isn't required for the other to work, they are two distinct
things.
I think that they should be split into two specs, one for the protocol
and one for gemtext.
This is on the roadmap as I understand it, when converting the specification to RFCs it will be split into two RFCs.
But I cannot find where I read that anymore, so maybe I’m not remembering correctly?
CĂ´me