💾 Archived View for metasyn.pw › ethics.gmi captured on 2023-09-28 at 16:01:10. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

ethics

- a set of moral principles

- a theory or system of moral values

- the principles of conduct governing an individual or group

given the distributed nature of the internet, and the fact that fascism is

alive and well and on the rise in many places in our world - i think it is

worth spelling out explicilty regarding things i do and don't support. i

thought that [blood and dust] worded the

following well:

we are committed to fighting normative violence, fascism, colonialism, and
white supremacy in all of its forms. to undermine the capitalist structure
and its abusive scripts about human worth in relation to work, productivity,
and ownership. to subvert oppressive gender norms and put in question the
binary. to actively unlearn biased and colonial thinking. to look inside and
face these parts of our darkness, personal and collective, and come out of it
with more kindness and compassion. we strive to use our platform to offer
connection, solidarity, and support with marginalized folks — people of
colour, trans, non-binary, and queer people, disabled folks, women, and
people living at the intersections of these identities — and to give back to
our communities, local and abroad.

my ethics revolve around [anarchism] more generally. but what is anarchism?

by anarchist spirit i mean that deeply human sentiment, which aims at the
good of all, freedom and justice for all, solidarity and love among the
people; which is not an exclusive characteristic only of self-declared
anarchists, but inspires all people who have a generous heart and an open
mind.

— Errico Malatesta, Umanita Nova, 1922-04-13

though more generally, [anarchist ethics]

are fraught with contradiction and complexity (though i have some belief all

ethical doctrines are probably complex in their own way). bob green in the

essay above makes a useful though broad categorization of anarchists:

individualistic, humanitarian and fundamentalistic. as it relates to ethics, i

relate to the individualist in the sense that we need to be true to ourselves,

and to the humanitarian in the sense that we need to support each other.

in [try anarchism for life], [cindy milstein] writes:

Anarchism, of course, has as many poetic definitions as there are anarchists,
which in itself gets at some of its expansive description. For an archaism’s
fundamental antagonism to all forms of power-over, even the power over
circumscribing the term, and exuberant openness to self-determination mean
that the word must stay dynamic, able to flexibly embrace all sorts of
liberatory ethics and practices. It can no more be contained than can all the
innumerable ways that humans and the nonhuman world engage routinely in forms
of mutual aid to not only survive but also thrive. Anarchism is a persistent
yearning for and rebellious unfolding toward forms of freedom, which will
always be (you guessed it) a journey.

sometimes the word defines its own definition, which can make it difficult to

use effectively. other philosophies that interrelate to my understanding of how

anarchism informs ethics include:

- [convivalism] - [manifesto]

- [solarpunk] - [manifesto]

- [worker cooperatives]

- [uncivilization]

Gemini Links:

index and recent changes

directory of all pages

anarchism

solarpunk

Web Links:

blood and dust

anarchist ethics

try anarchism for life

cindy milstein

convivalism

manifesto

solarpunk] - [manifesto

worker cooperatives

uncivilization