💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 007266.gmi captured on 2023-09-08 at 16:39:41. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nathan Galt mailinglists at ngalt.com
Tue Oct 5 04:27:19 BST 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Oct 3, 2021, at 10:09 PM, Plain Text <text at sdfeu.org> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Oct 2021 11:54:39 +0100, Oliver Simmons wrote:
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 at 00:16, Plain Text <text at sdfeu.org> wrote:
merged group for c.i.gopher and c.i.gemini – but lacking a … name
"Small-web" or "small-net" are sometimes used, most often to describe a
combination browser for these protocols.
There's quite a bit of overlap between the communities.
Thanks, so true! And so I began to write an RFD document for "Small Scale
Hypertext Information Systems" in the same pad (carbon copy below):
https://pads.ccc.de/comp-infosystems-gemini-rfd
Please, anybody feel free to edit along and/or give other input, also on
the name and the byline, and the whole endeavour, of course, as I do not
want to diminish the efforts already put into the first RFD process.
This might be a fantastically premature question, but:
Twitter was once a small Ruby on Rails app. Since “small” is a functional definition, does a protocol get booted out of the group if it becomes too popular?