💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006941.gmi captured on 2023-09-08 at 16:46:54. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
gemproj at suckless.anonaddy.com gemproj at suckless.anonaddy.com
Mon Jul 19 12:35:44 BST 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
He makes a few very valid points that gemini suffers from as well, if youconsider them bad. Otherwise they'd be features right?
However the biggest complaint I have with his assessment is the thingsgemini struggles with, too. Discovery and searchability. At least you canlink on gemini, but on a pdf a link is a potentially dead thing, more deadthan on gemini or on the web.
Apart from that he makes a few very good and valid points. I like it (apartfrom having another pdf on my phone now that I manually need to delete🤦♀️)
~m
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 13:08 Stephane Bortzmeyer 'stephane at sources.org',<gemproj+stephane=sources.org at suckless.anonaddy.com> wrote:
This email was sent to gemproj at suckless.anonaddy.com from
stephane at sources.org and has been forwarded by AnonAddy.
To deactivate this alias copy and paste the url below into your web
browser.
https://app.anonaddy.com/deactivate/84c97fb7-dd72-4688-b653-188215324c2a?signature=e4cd6fabb5144657ed72ac3c56cde019ecccfe366af0b08968536f9080c11eba
-----
A well-deserved rant against the current state of the Web,
well-written and with many fine points we will all agree with. But the
conclusion will surprise many of you: instead of Gemini, he suggests…
PDF.
https://lab6.com/0
-------------- next part --------------An HTML attachment was scrubbed...URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20210719/5f730cb8/attachment.htm>