💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 004926.gmi captured on 2023-09-08 at 17:33:16. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

Proposal: Simple structured form specification

nothien at uber.space nothien at uber.space

Tue Jan 26 12:43:10 GMT 2021

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Russtopia <rmagee at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

Hi!

[... form proposal ... ]

The issue is that Gemini (and gemtext) is too close to being frozenforever. And most Gemini content out there doesn't need to use forms.

I have an alternative proposal: make the form on a new page, and usesomething other than gemtext for it (and possibly something other thanGemini the protocol). I suggest instead making a gemtext-derived formatthat is specially suited to forms, which has special line types andstuff as necessary (in fact, I suggest adding a similar line type to theone you gave in your proposal). You could probably borrow from a lot ofthe gemtext spec directly. It would be best to use one of theGemini-analogue protocols which allow uploading (I know of Dioscuri,Titan, and Inimeg) so that users could submit the form by performing anupload process to the same URL. Using a different protocol would bebest as then there are no upload limitations; with Gemini, the URL givenby the client has to be less than ~1024 bytes, which is not suited toall forms.

~aravk | ~nothien