💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 603.gmi captured on 2023-09-08 at 19:02:11. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2008-07-25 08:50:27
Speed-reading is the purported ability to read as many as 10,000 to 25,000
words a minute. For example, Howard Berg claims to be able to read 25,000 words
a minute by reading "15 lines at a time backwards and forwards." That's about
80-90 pages a minute. Tolstoy's War and Peace should take Berg about 15 minutes
to read.
George Stancliffe claims he has taught a woman with a reading disability to
read 18,000 words a minute. Such a feat, he says, is common in children, but
rare in adults.*
Anne Cunningham, a University of California at Berkeley education professor and
an expert on reading, reports that tests measuring saccades (small rapid jerky
movement of the eye as it jumps from fixation on one point to another) while
reading have determined that the maximum number of words a person can
accurately read is about 300 a minute. "People who purport to read 10,000 words
a minute are doing what we call skimming," she said. Speed in reading is mainly
determined by how fast a reader can understand the words and expressions one is
reading. The fastest readers are those with excellent "recognition
vocabularies." Faster readers can see words and understand them faster than
slower readers. To improve one's speed at reading, she says, one should work on
comprehension and study strategies (Robertson).
Others claim that "the average college student reads between 250 and 350 words
per minute on fiction and non-technical materials" and that a "good" reading
speed is 500-700 words per minute.* It does seem intuitively true that one
could speed up one's reading by (a) spending less time between eye movements;
(b) taking in more words with each fixation; and (c) always moving forward,
rather than skipping back to re-read something. Having a good recognition
vocabulary would certainly speed these processes up. Conscious practice at
improving one's speed should also help.
Berg has repackaged the Evelyn Wood Reading Dynamics course, one popular
several decades ago with people like John F. Kennedy. A reporter who attended
one of Berg's classes noted that in his five-hour course, Berg hadn't said much
about comprehension, except to suggest that it would come with practice. This
did not deter several of the 35 students, who had paid $51 each for the class
from the Learning Exchange in Sacramento, from purchasing audio tapes for $65
(Robertson).
Those desiring to increase the speed of their reading would do better to enroll
in a community college course devoted to building study skills, vocabulary, and
reading comprehension. It would cost them less, and they would not end up
wasting their time trying to read 10 lines at a time, backward and forward.
They would also avoid the frustration that will be inevitable when they find
that while they can skim through material at a greater rate than they can read
it, the utility of such a skill is limited (good for most of what's likely to
be in the daily newspaper, for example, but not for studying physics or reading
a good novel). Skimming makes both comprehension and taking pleasure in words
or ideas next to impossible. Why read fiction at all if you don't want to enjoy
the language and the ideas? Who would want to hire a physician or lawyer who
skimmed rather than read his or her texts?
near-perfect comprehension. His name is Kim Peek and he has the ability to read
two pages simultaneously, one with each eye, with 98% retention. Nobody knows
how he does it but he was born without a corpus callosum, that bundle of nerves
that connects the right and left hemispheres of the brain. However, others have
also been born with no corpus callosum, or have had it surgically disconnected,
without resulting in an increase in reading or retention abilities. Kim can
recall most of the contents of some 7,600 books. But, since nobody knows how
Kim Peek does it, nobody can teach this skill to others.
Kim Peek was partly the model for Raymond, the idiot savant in the movie Rain
Man.
July 13, 2006
After reading the article I do not believe that you have done the proper
research about speed reading. Have you questioned an authority about speed
reading before you wrote your article? More importantly have you yourself taken
a course on speed reading or are you basing your opinion on word of mouth? I
ask that, realizing that you quoted someone named Anne Cunningham, an expert on
reading who seems to have no idea how actual speed reading works or how
effective it is.
---- reply: In the early 1960s I became interested in speed reading after
reading about John F. Kennedy's support for the Evelyn Wood method. I studied
speed reading and found that I could read significantly faster if I spent less
time between eye movements by taking in several words rather than one word at a
time and if I didn't have to re-read things or stop to look up words. Having a
large recognition vocabulary did more to speed up my reading than anything
else. I was fortunate to have had a high-school English teacher who required
his students to learn 20 new words a week. For many years, I studied the
dictionary to expand my vocabulary as much as I could.
I took two courses on speed reading in college to help me with my courses and
can tell you from personal experience that my increased speed in reading (from
about 350 wpm to about 1,900 wpm ) and comprehension (from about 52% to over 75
%) had little to do with saccades and increased word recognition. My over-all
study-time dropped dramatically and my grades all came up as well.
---- reply: Obviously, you were highly motivated to succeed. I don't doubt that
you can skim 1,900 wpm with 75% comprehension and that for many college courses
that would be sufficient to get an A.
In essence, speed reading involves a few disciplines and understandings. First
of all, that the human mind can process information faster that the human eye
can read. Try reading exceptionally slow (1 word per minute for instance) and
see how far your comprehension drops as your mind wanders and forgets what it
had previously read. Your mind is much more focused on the subject at hand when
you are reading more words per minute, which is one of the reasons
comprehension goes up so dramatically in speed readers.
---- reply: You are right that a focused, attentive reader will read faster
than an unfocused, inattentive reader. But I don't think that this has anything
to do with the speed of processing information by the "human mind" versus the
speed of processing information by the human eye. It has to do with processing
information when focused and attentive versus processing information when there
are distractions.
Speed reading also involves opening up your peripheral vision to take-in
multiple words at once rather than reading just one word at a time. We were
taught to take-in two words at once, then advanced to an entire line of text at
one time. (I was only proficient at taking in about 5 7 words at a time but
others were much better than I.) Still, you can see how this would diminish any
talk of the speed at which ones eyes would have to jump around a page
(saccade.) Our instructor was able to take in two lines at once. By keeping the
center of our vision in the middle of the page, we were taught to read down the
page and take-in the full width of the page at one time.
Back in grade school we all learned to read a word one letter at a time,
sounding out the words in our heads or out loud. As we all developed we learned
to read one entire word at a time. Speed reading involves reading BLOCKS of
words at one time and absorbing the overall meaning of the words, much like
viewing an image understanding its meaning. In short, you can better discern
the meaning from a group of words than you can by adding a single word at a
time. If you can read as fast as your mind can comprehend you are much less
likely to forget key points.
Another thing we learned to do (with difficulty in my case) was to shut off the
little voice in your head that sounded out each word. This is known as
sub-vocalization and most people do it. If a person does this, their maximum
reading speed is held in check by the maximum speed at which they can sound-out
the words, which is approximately their talking speed ( Which, coincidentally
is 250 350 wpm.) Getting rid of that habit alone almost doubled my reading
speed. Speed reading is definitely a skill that needs to be practiced or you
lose some of your ability.
---- reply: Perhaps in skimming my article you missed my mention of the
importance of taking in more words with each fixation. Subvocalization is a
problem that is resolved by taking in blocks of words instead of single words.
You cannot sound out blocks of words. I don't specifically mention this problem
in my article but perhaps I should have.
I will say that I enjoy reading science fiction work and other items at my
normal speed, but when I have to its nice to know that I can read much faster,
comprehend and remember much more than normal if I have to. If you have done so
already I ask that you take a class for yourself and see just how incorrect
your article was.
Jason Hatch
---- reply: Thanks, but I think you missed some key points in my article.
07 Nov 2003
I am an educational consultant and have expertise in the area of "speed
reading", and was a partner with Evelyn Wood (1909-1995).
1. It is time to update your article based on the latest 'unbiased' research.
In the industry we respect Howard Berg and George Stancliffe, but they are the
exception, not the rule, in terms of throwing-around-numbers. The rest of us
would never dream of talking about 25,000 words per minute, even as publicity
hyperbole. It's a joke. In the past we have tracked thousands,
tens-of-thousands of graduates, and not had 'one' in two-million
(real-number!), read at that illusionary 25K words per minute. There are freaks
in all fields, but we have not run-across them - yet even in 'Basic' - which is
a simple novel. Forget about 'Semi' or 'Tuff' material, which includes
textbooks or Scientific American.
2. The typical graduate can expect to read 'triple' their beginning reading
speed - (300%), in Basic, Semi-Tuff and Tuff-Stuff level of difficulty
material, with equal or better (about 10%), improvement in comprehension. Most
start at 250wpm on Basic, and drop to 150wpm when confronted with dense text in
Semi and Tuff material; so does their comprehension drop like a rock.
3. Please see: www.uwgb.edu/esms/sss/read.htm This is used by the University of
Wisconsin, at Green Bay, and taken from the leading collegiate textbook on
"accelerated" reading.
4. One of my clients - www.speedlearning.org is affiliated with a major
university, and does pre-testing, mid-term- and post-testing, and does not
depend on subjective feedback. They produce graduates from 5th grade (Public
School 59) in NYC, and executives and professionals who maintain their "triple"
reading speed and comprehension - ad infinitum. They do not engage in the use
of the Power of Suggestion, Cold Readings, Push or other nonsense to inflate a
student's success.
5. If you are interested in today's speed reading strategies and training-tools
- (SpeedLearning uses a handheld laser-pace called a RasterMaster), you might
want to take the course in NYC without tuition or the need to offer a
complimentary 'testimonial' at its conclusion.
6. Graduates can read "three" books, articles or reports with improved
comprehension, compared to their original skills of reading perhaps one book,
but with lousy recall.
Hal