💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 5336.gmi captured on 2023-09-08 at 17:44:43. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

LEE KUAN YEW - Autocracy in Singapore? Hardly, says writer

2015-03-29 17:24:22

By Sahana Singh

Between my early life in India and my current life in the United States, I

spent 14 years in paradise: Singapore.

From clean water and crime-free streets to reliable public transportation and

easy access to libraries, the Government anticipates all the basic needs to

provide its residents a good quality of life and eliminate the stresses that

can impede personal progress.

But in the coverage that followed the death of Singapore's founding Prime

Minister Lee Kuan Yew on Monday, Western media has painted a very different

picture.

They describe a crushing autocrat who chained his people and stripped them of

basic freedoms. My experience was quite the contrary. Outside of this tiny

island utopia, I never felt more free.

When we first arrived and checked into a hotel, I called room service and asked

for a jug of filtered water - a standard health precaution. The hotel employee

dismissed my concerns: "You can drink water from the tap in your bathroom."

At first, I was horrified by the suggestion. In India, water filters were as

common as TV sets and refrigerators in middle- and upper-class homes. But here,

I soon discovered, the state maintained a high-quality water treatment process

that delivered purified water nationwide. Not only was Singapore's water

drinkable straight from the tap, but it always gushed with good pressure, even

on the top floors of the tallest buildings. It was my first introduction to a

government that works.

In my first days in Singapore, I worried about safely getting around town,

especially with a baby. I had never used local trains and feared ending up in a

dangerous neighbourhood.

But what would be reasonable fears for a newcomer in most countries were

gratuitous in Singapore. Everywhere were street signs and directions in

English, clearly marked and intelligently placed, as if invisible planners were

anticipating your next question.

There was no litter in Singapore's streets. Every building looked clean and

every walkway looked newly washed. The National Library had numerous branches,

stocked with wonderful books. With my baby in a stroller, I could go

practically anywhere. It was like an India I had always dreamed of: clean,

green and hassle-free.

How was this possible? Singapore gained its independence nearly 20 years after

India and, yet, the island nation now boasts a remarkably diverse economy, the

world's top airline, clean rivers and a thriving trade port - all achieved in

just a few decades. The engine behind that transformation was the governance of

Lee Kuan Yew, the man whose vision took this little dot of a city-state "from

Third World to First".

But not everyone shared my admiration. At the time, a friend of mine from the

US told me nothing could make her move to Singapore: "I would hate to live in a

country where my freedoms are curtailed," she declared loftily.

I could only laugh. There I was, freer than anytime I had been in my life. I

had just found a job I loved. I could go see a movie with friends and return by

myself late at night.

I could fall asleep in a taxi, after reeling off my address, and the driver

would safely take me home and gently wake me up.

Singapore maintains an efficient - if strict - judicial system, fundamental to

living in a low-crime society while practising individual freedom. I had tasted

the real freedom that came with security.

Many point to the price Singapore's citizens and residents pay for achieving

that security. The Government imposes strict laws with steep fines and

punishments for even minor transgressions: Breaching the ban on selling gum can

fetch a fine. Vandalising property can lead to caning.

These kinds of sentences may be an affront to American ideals, but in

Singapore, like many Asian countries, ensuring the greater good is paramount to

self-determination. Americans, it should be noted, also pay a price for the

premium they put on individual liberties.

Westerners ridicule Singapore for restrictions on personal expression and

protest, but overlook how the nation provides more freedom than some of the

most-lauded democracies.

In Singapore, there was no gun culture like America's or neighbourhoods with

street gangs to be avoided.

As my daughter grew older, I could easily let her move around the city with no

worries about her safety. Around the country, there are plenty of mosques,

churches and temples in close proximity, along with Christian, Muslim, Hindu

and Buddhist national holidays.

The national government is highly transparent and virtually incorruptible,

functioning better than some chaotic, so-called democracies.

And yet the world asked why the average Singaporean, who had good schooling, a

job, affordable housing, healthcare, childcare and eldercare don't protest from

rooftops?

May Singapore never squander the legacy of Lee Kuan Yew.

THE WASHINGTON POST