💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 5117.gmi captured on 2023-09-08 at 17:48:19. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Why reports of paper's death are premature

2014-06-09 10:27:31

By Robert Cottrell

Our picks of the week from around the web, including robot servants at home,

the continuing lure of the printed page and visualising centuries of chess

games.

London s buried diggers

Ed Smith | New Statesman | 5 June 2014

When archaeologists excavate the foundations of present-day central London,

they will find 1,000 mechanical diggers entombed in concrete. Note to the

future: These are not sacrifices to some mechanical god, but the by-product of

a fashion among the rich for adding basement swimming pools and media rooms.

When the digging is done, the digger is stuck. You d need a crane to get it

out. Cheaper to wall it up and write it off.

A theory of jerks

Eric Schwitzgebel | Aeon | 4 June 2014

We need a theory of jerks. We need such a theory because, first, it can help

us achieve a calm, clinical understanding when confronting such a creature in

the wild. And we need a theory, second, because it may help us to see when we

are jerks ourselves. As one climbs the social hierarchy it is easier to become

a jerk. Thinking yourself important is a self-gratifying excuse for

disregarding the interests of others.

What happens when the Booster-Maxx breaks?

Alejandro Tauber | Motherboard | 30 May 2014

How far will you be flung if the bolts break on your super-terrifying Booster

Maxx fairground ride, throwing you off at a speed of 40.3m per second and an

angle of 45 degrees to the ground? The grand total is around 204 metres before

you die a bloody and painful death . If you re on the Booster Maxx in Dam

Square, Amsterdam, you would have a 50/50 chance of hitting the spires of

Nieuwe Kerk.

So, where are my robot servants?

Erico Guizzo | IEEE Spectrum | 29 May 2014

They may not be far away. Components are getting better and cheaper. Research

and investment is booming. The robots that will really change things will

perform multiple tasks. They won t do everything right out of the box. They ll

come equipped with attachment points for new accessories and standard

interfaces that allow new third-party software to add functions, much like apps

on phones.

You re right, I didn t eat that

Alana Massey | New Inquiry | 29 May 2014

On the sexual economy of staying thin. There are a number of euphemisms for

female thinness that do not require a man to make the impolite admission of his

exclusive attraction to women with very little body fat. Though active and

full of energy make respectable showings, they are a distance second and third

from a woman who takes care of herself . When he says herself , he means,

her body .

Will regulators hold back self-driving cars?

Joshua Gans | Digitopoly | 29 May 2014

By pitching their first driverless cars towards the elderly and disabled, for

short trips on slow local roads, Google is internalising the safety concerns

that would probably block the immediate introduction of driverless cars for

general highway use. It s a win for Google, and for regulation. It would not

surprise me if regulators and politicians turn out to be Google s friend in the

driverless car business.

The eunuch s children

Nicholas Carr | Rough Type | 25 May 2014

Paper survives and thrives despite the digital revolution. To the human mind,

a sequence of pages bound together into a physical object is very different

from a flat screen that displays only a single page at a time. The physical

presence of the printed pages, and the ability to flip back and forth through

them, turns out to be important to the mind s ability to navigate written

works, particularly lengthy and complicated ones.

Chess tournament games and Elo ratings

Randal S Olson | 24 May 2014

Exercises in data visualisation using results from 675,000 chess tournament

games dating back to the 15th Century. Elo ratings reliably predict which

player will win: I d imagine the only reason this trend levels out at ~90% is

because this data set contains games where a talented new player hasn t quite

reached their proper Elo rating yet. Playing white confers a strong advantage

to an expert, less so to a rookie.