💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 3558.gmi captured on 2023-09-08 at 18:13:55. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

LHC reveals hints of 'new physics' in particle decays

2011-11-16 07:40:51

15 November 2011 Last updated at 12:18 GMT

By Jason Palmer Science and technology reporter, BBC News

Large Hadron Collider researchers have shown off what may be the facility's

first "new physics" outside our current understanding of the Universe.

Particles called D-mesons seem to decay slightly differently from their

antiparticles, LHCb physicist Matthew Charles told the HCP 2011 meeting on

Monday.

The result may help explain why we see so much more matter than antimatter.

The team stresses that further analysis will be needed to shore up the result.

At the moment, they are claiming a statistical certainty of "3.5 sigma" -

suggesting that there is less than a 0.05% chance that the result they see is

down to chance.

The team has nearly double the amount of data that they have analysed so far,

so time will tell whether the result reaches the "five-sigma" level that

qualifies it for a formal discovery.

It matters

The LHCb detector was designed to examine particles containing so-called beauty

quarks, watching them decay through time after high-energy collisions of other

fundamental particles.

The LHCb Collaboration was looking at decays of particles called D-mesons,

which contain what are known as charmed-quarks, which can in turn decay into

kaons and pions.

Statistics of a 'discovery'

Two-pence piece

Particle physics has an accepted definition for a "discovery": a five-sigma

level of certainty

The number of standard deviations, or sigmas, is a measure of how unlikely it

is that an experimental result is simply down to chance rather than a real

effect

Similarly, tossing a coin and getting a number of heads in a row may just be

chance, rather than a sign of a "loaded" coin

The "three sigma" level represents about the same likelihood of tossing more

than eight heads in a row

Five sigma, on the other hand, would correspond to tossing more than 20 in a

row

A five-sigma result is highly unlikely to happen by chance, and thus an

experimental result becomes an accepted discovery

LHCb, one of the six separate experiments at the Large Hadron Collider, is

particularly suited for examining what is called "charge-parity violation" -

slight differences in behaviour if a given particle is swapped for its

antimatter counterpart (changing its charge) and turned around one of its axes

(changing its parity).

Our best understanding of physics so far, called the Standard Model, suggests

that the complicated cascades of decay of D-mesons into other particles should

be very nearly the same - within less than 0.1% - as a similar chain of

antimatter decays.

Other experiments, notably at the Fermi National Accelerator facility in the

US, have not definitively found a notable difference between the two kinds of

decay of D-mesons.

But the LHCb team is reporting a difference of about 0.8% - a significant

difference that, if true, could herald the first "new physics" to be found at

the LHC.

"Our result is more significant because our precision is improved - somewhat

more precise than all of the previous results put together," Dr Charles told

BBC News.

Spotting such a difference in the behaviour of matter and antimatter particles

may also finally help explain why our Universe is overwhelmingly made of

matter.

"Certainly this kind of effect, a new source of CP violation, could be a

manifestation of the physics which drives the matter - antimatter asymmetry,"

Dr Charles explained.

However, he stressed there are "many steps in the chain" between confirming the

collaboration's experimental result, and resolving the theory to accommodate

it.

"This result is a hint of something interesting and if it bears out, it will

mean that, at a minimum, our current theoretical understanding needs

improving," Dr Charles said.

"It's exactly the sort of thing for which the LHC was originally built."