💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 3302.gmi captured on 2023-09-08 at 18:18:04. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2011-08-23 05:14:47
By Jane Wakefield Technology reporter
If you were expecting some kind warning when computers finally get smarter than
us, then think again.
There will be no soothing HAL 9000-type voice informing us that our human
services are now surplus to requirements.
In reality, our electronic overlords are already taking control, and they are
doing it in a far more subtle way than science fiction would have us believe.
Their weapon of choice - the algorithm.
Behind every smart web service is some even smarter web code. From the web
retailers - calculating what books and films we might be interested in, to
Facebook's friend finding and imaging tagging services, to the search engines
that guide us around the net.
It is these invisible computations that increasingly control how we interact
with our electronic world.
At last month's TEDGlobal conference, algorithm expert Kevin Slavin delivered
one of the tech show's most "sit up and take notice" speeches where he warned
that the "maths that computers use to decide stuff" was infiltrating every
aspect of our lives.
Among the examples he cited were a robo-cleaner that maps out the best way to
do housework, and the online trading algorithms that are increasingly
controlling Wall Street.
"We are writing these things that we can no longer read," warned Mr Slavin.
"We've rendered something illegible. And we've lost the sense of what's
actually happening in this world we've made."
Million-dollar book
Cover of the Making of a Fly The book was briefly one of the world's most
expensive
Algorithms may be cleverer than humans but they don't necessarily have our
sense of perspective - a failing that became evident when Amazon's
price-setting code went to war with itself earlier this year.
"The Making of a Fly" - a book about the molecular biology of a fly from egg to
fully-fledged insect - may have been a riveting read but it almost certainly
didn't deserve a price tag of $23.6m ( 14.3m).
It hit that figure briefly on the site after the algorithms used by Amazon to
set and update prices started outbidding each other.
It is a small taste of the chaos that can be caused when code gets smart enough
to operate without human intervention, thinks Mr Slavin.
"This is algorithms in conflict without any adult supervision," he said.
As code gets ever more sophisticated it is reaching its tentacles into all
aspects of our lives, including our cultural preferences.
The algorithms used by movie rental site Netflix are now responsible for 60% of
rentals from the site, as we rely less and less on our own critical faculties
and word of mouth and more on what Mr Slavin calls the "physics of culture".
Leading role
Hollywood sign Code is playing its own lead role in Hollywood
British firm Epagogix is taking this concept to its logical conclusion, using
algorithms to predict what makes a hit movie.
It takes a bunch of metrics - the script, plot, stars, location - and crunches
them all together with the box office takings of similar films to work out how
much money it will make.
The system has, according to chief executive Nick Meaney, "helped studios to
make decisions about whether to make a movie or not".
In the case of one project - which had been assigned a 180m production cost -
the algorithm worked out that it would only take 30m at the box office,
meaning it simply wasn't worth making.
For another movie, it worked out that the expensive female lead the studio had
earmarked for a film would not yield any more of a return than using a less
expensive star.
This rather clinical approach to film-making has irked some who believe it to
be at odds with a more creative, organic way that they assume their favourite
movies were made.
Mr Meaney is keen to play down the role of algorithms in Hollywood.
"Movies get made for many reasons and it credits us with more influence than we
have to say we dictate what films are made.
Start Quote
Our brains rely on the internet for memory
Betsy Sparrow Psychologist, Columbia University
"We don't tell them what the plot should be. The studio uses this as valuable
business information. We help people make tough decisions, and why not?" he
said.
Despite this, the studio Epagogix has worked with for the last five years does
not want to be named. It is, says Mr Meaney, a "sensitive" subject.
Secret sauce
If algorithms had a Hollywood-style walk of fame, the first star would have to
go to Google.
Its famously secret code has propelled the search giant to its current position
as one of the most powerful companies in the world.
No-one would doubt that its system has made searching a whole lot easier, but
critics have long asked at what price?
In his book, The Filter Bubble, Eli Pariser questions how far Google's
data-crunching algorithm go in harvesting our personal data and shaping the web
we see accordingly.
Meanwhile, a recent study by psychologists at Columbia University found that
reliance on search engines for answers is actually changing the way humans
think.
"Since the advent of search engines, we are reorganising the way we remember
things. Our brains rely on the internet for memory in much the same way they
rely on the memory of a friend, family member or co-worker," said report author
Betsy Sparrow.
Increasingly, she argues, we are knowing where information can be found rather
than retaining knowledge itself.
Flash crash
Traders at the New York stock exchange Move over traders, there's a new code in
town
In the financial markets, code is increasingly becoming king as complex
number-crunching algorithms work out what to buy and what to sell.
Up to 70% of Wall Street trading is now run by so-called black box or
algo-trading.
That means, along with the wise guy city traders, banks and brokers now employ
thousands of smart guy physicists and mathematicians.
But even machine precision, supported by the human code wizards, doesn't
guarantee things will run smoothly.
In the so-called Flash Crash of 2.45 on May 6 2010, a five minute dip in the
markets caused momentary chaos.
Start Quote
We are running through the United States with dynamite and rocksaws so an
algorithm can close the deal three microseconds faster.
Kevin Slavin Algorithm expert
A rogue trader was blamed for the 10% Dow Jones index fall but in reality, it
was the computer program that the unnamed trader was using that was really to
blame.
The algorithm sold 75,000 stocks with a value of 2.6bn in just 20 minutes,
causing other super-fast trading algorithms to follow suit.
Just as a bionic limb can extend a human's capability for strength and stamina,
the electronic market showed its capacity to exaggerate and accelerate minor
blips.
No-one has ever managed to pinpoint exactly what happened, and the market
recovered minutes later.
The chaos forced regulators to introduce circuit breakers to halt trades if the
machines start misbehaving.
The algorithms of Wall Street may be the cyber-equivalent of the 80's yuppie,
but unlike their human counterparts, they don't demand red braces, cigars and
champagne. What they want is fast pipes.
Spread Networks has been building one such fibre-optic connection, shaving
three microseconds off the 825-mile (1327km) trading journey between Chicago
and New York.
Meanwhile, a transatlantic fibre optic link between Nova Scotia in Canada and
Somerset in the UK is being built primarily to serve the needs of algorithmic
traders and will send shares from London to New York and back in 60
milliseconds.
"We are running through the United States with dynamite and rock saws so an
algorithm can close the deal three microseconds faster, all for a
communications system that no humans will ever see," said Mr Slavin.
As algorithms spread their influence beyond machines to shape the raw landscape
around them, it might be time to work out exactly how much they know and
whether we still have time to tame them.