💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 2842.gmi captured on 2023-09-08 at 18:25:36. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

German companies great and small are making the most of globalisation. Their

1970-01-01 02:00:00

rlp

German business

A machine running smoothly

Feb 3rd 2011 | BERLIN | from PRINT EDITION

THE silence is unsettling, as is the sight of half-assembled cars gliding about

on robotic transporters that move as if they had minds of their own. The scene

of this industrial serenity is Porsche s assembly line in Leipzig. The airy,

almost clinical factory provides a good illustration of how, even as its

European neighbours and other rich economies splutter fitfully out of

recession, Germany has been zooming along the economic autobahn.

The production line that ends in Leipzig spans whole countries. Painted bodies

for the Cayenne, a sport-utility vehicle, are brought by train from a factory

owned by Volkswagen (with which a merger is pending) in Slovakia. Those for the

Panamera, a hatchback, come in from Hanover. The robotic carriers then ferry

them from one group of assembly workers to the next. Parts arrive just as they

are needed. The system is flexible, allowing two different models to roll off

the line in exactly the required numbers. The cars then head east and west to

Porsche s two biggest markets, China and America.

The factory shows how Porsche has gained from globalisation and how Germany

has, too. On the demand side, the carmaker sells at premium prices to the world

s fastest-growing big economy and to simply its biggest. On the production

side, it uses expensive but flexible German labour on what can be seen and

cheaper east European workers on what cannot. Germany is by far the world s

biggest winner from globalisation, says Thomas Mayer, Deutsche Bank s chief

economist. It has benefited from both increased division of labour on the

production side and increased trade on the delivery side.

Related items

Germany s recent economic performance stands out among rich economies (see

article). Last year its GDP grew by 3.6%, the fastest rate since the country

was reunified in 1990. America managed 2.9%. Growth in the rest of the euro

zone probably fell short of 1%. Exports have been Germany s main engine: they

jumped by 21.7% in the year to November. In the first ten months of 2010 sales

to China were already 17% higher than in the whole of 2009 and 46% higher than

in 2007. No other big, rich economy has seen its exports to China grow so

quickly in the past decade (see chart 1). No wonder that business confidence,

according to a widely watched index produced by Ifo, a research institute at

the University of Munich, is at a record high, having recovered from a horrid

plunge in late 2008 (see chart 2).

The pace seems to be easing: The Economist s poll of forecasters suggests GDP

growth will slow to 2.6% this year, but that is still well ahead of the 1.5%

expected for the euro zone as a whole. The success of German business is plain.

It also raises a question: has Germany just been lucky to be making the sorts

of things that China and other fast-growing economies happen to need now, or

has it made its own good fortune? The answer is a bit of both, but there s

probably been more skill than luck.

Start with the improvement of Germany s biggest companies, which a decade or so

ago seemed to have been left behind by foreign rivals, even in sectors of

traditional German strength. Japan s Toyota was on its way to becoming the

world s biggest carmaker. America s General Electric (GE) was ensconced as the

world s largest industrial company.

Corporate Germany looked old-fashioned. Big companies were enmeshed in

cross-shareholdings with the country s leading banks that protected managers

from the grumbles of other shareholders and from takeovers. German reliance on

manufacturing looked like a weakness: the business of making things seemed

certain to migrate to Asia or eastern Europe, and Germany s service industries

were hidebound and over-regulated. Unemployment was chronically high and

unit-labour costs were above the euro-zone average.

These days corporate Germany looks rather different. Volkswagen, the country s

leading carmaker, wants to be the world s biggest by 2018. It is a realistic

ambition. The industrial bits of Siemens are now larger than GE s (ie, once GE

s media and financial businesses are stripped out). BASF, a chemicals

powerhouse, has managed to keep expanding at home and abroad, even as

production of basic chemicals has fallen in America and the rest of Europe.

The cross-shareholdings have been unwound: Deutsche Bank, for instance, no

longer owns chunks of insurers, carmakers or sugar processors. Big companies

are now concerned with serving their shareholders rather than workers and other

stakeholders (even if few boast about it: in Germany it would not be popular).

New chief executives have culled underperforming operations and focused on

growth, often abroad. Siemens, which used to be content to sell overengineered

and overpriced trains and generators to captive German buyers, has taken a leaf

from GE s book, selling businesses where it lacked scale, for instance in

consumer electronics, and concentrating instead on areas in which it has a

chance of being among the world s leaders, such as energy and medical

technology. Once its primary concern seemed to be to preserve jobs in Germany.

Now two-thirds of its employees are abroad. Linde has gone from being a

diverse, second-rate engineering firm to become Europe s, and one of the world

s, leading producers of industrial gases.

In the engine room

The main motor of Germany s growth, however, is the Mittelstand, a legion of

mainly small and medium-sized firms, typically family-owned and highly

specialised, that build products that dominate obscure branches of industry. If

a particular job can best be done by a machine, then the chances are that the

machine in question was built in a small town in Germany. Wirtgen is a leader

in making machines that recycle tar and grit from old roads to be relaid as

smooth new ones, as is Leitz in making wood-processing tools. Machines that

make other things are a Mittelstand speciality. Kugler-Womako, a champion in

production lines for printing passports and Winkler+D nnebier, which makes

machines that produce envelopes, are just two of the firms that Hermann Simon,

a German management consultant, identifies as the country s hidden champions .

In some respects the Mittelstand is a philosophical construct, rather than just

a description of company size. Firms such as B. Braun, a family-owned maker of

medical supplies, or Bosch, an engineering group owned by a charitable

foundation, are a good deal larger than many listed firms, yet still espouse

what they would claim are Mittelstand values: attention to detail, financial

caution and co-operation between bosses and employees. Bosch, for instance,

tightened its belt in the downturn without mass lay-offs. Last year its sales

were a record 47.3 billion ($62.6 billion), up by 24% from 2009, and it

returned to profit. It plans to increase its labour force from 283,500 to about

300,000 this year. Most of the new staff will be abroad, especially in Asia.

Firms of all sizes have spread themselves abroad, in search not only of markets

but also of cheaper production. Germany is not just a leading exporter; plenty

of imports arrive in towns all over the country to be assembled into costlier

goods and sent abroad again. Michael H ther, the director of the Cologne

Institute for Economic Research, reckons that the import content of German

exports has gone up by about ten percentage points to more than 20% in the past

decade.

German firms have also been adept at outsourcing. In 2004 a study by McKinsey,

a firm of consultants, concluded that the economy gained just 0.80 (then about

$1) for every 1 of corporate spending that German firms sent offshore. At the

time America gained more than $1 for each $1 of spending its companies moved

abroad. Not only were German firms less good at finding productive

opportunities in foreign countries; German workers, if displaced, were less

likely to find new jobs quickly. The gap seems to have narrowed, as companies

have reaped the benefits of moving production, and some services, to cheaper

places, while jobs have been created in Germany too. Recent studies suggest

that German firms have cut labour costs by as much as 70% by shifting

production of some components abroad.

In this Germany has been blessed by geography, as some of its main

manufacturing regions abut formerly communist states with cheaper but still

well-educated workforces. This has allowed Porsche, Volkswagen and others to

move production to the east far more easily than, say, British firms have been

able to do.

Forced to be flexible

Cheap labour on the doorstep has also helped to hold down costs at home. The

ease with which jobs can be shifted has given German employers extra power in

pay negotiations. This goes a long way to explaining why real wages in Germany

have remained essentially flat in the past decade while they have climbed in

most other countries that use the euro. Employers and unions have also made

agreements to establish flexible working hours: workers put in extra shifts at

busy times and have time off when things are slack. We had to learn to breathe

with the cycle, says Ralph Wiechers, the chief economist of the VDMA, an

industry group.

German industry s steely ability to hold down costs was also helped by the

Hartz reforms, introduced when Gerhard Schr der, a Social Democrat, was

chancellor between 1998 and 2005. Many in business credit the economy s rebound

to these reforms, which freed up labour markets and made work more attractive

than life on unemployment benefits.

For workers, who conceded flexibility and agreed to wage restraint, the bargain

has meant they have kept their jobs, even during the depths of the downturn

when most German firms cut working hours instead of firing people. This was

especially true in the Mittelstand. Engineering firms, which saw orders

collapse by almost a quarter during the recession, cut employment by about 8%.

About 10% of smaller firms had to reject orders because they could not get

credit, says Mario Ohoven, president of the German Association of Small and

Medium-sized Businesses. Only a small fraction of these shed workers.

The costs, and risks, of keeping people on the payroll were partly shouldered

by the state. Nevertheless, they represented a belief that demand for German

products would rebound quickly. It did, and firms were in a strong position to

speed up production. Now that German unemployment is shrinking again at 7.4%,

seasonally adjusted, the rate is at its lowest since 1992 many firms are

fretting about a shortage of skilled employees.

But costs are only part of the equation. Bain, a management-consulting firm,

reckons that German companies have come out of the West s economic crisis

nimbler than ever. Many would have planned capital spending once a year, for

instance. Now they do so every few months. The latest recession went so deep

that it finally unlocked some real change, says Oliver Str hle, a partner at

Bain.

Precision pays

As important has been the bloodhound-like ability of Germany s firms to sniff

out niches where competition is the least fierce. From the Mittelstand up,

German firms have found a blend of engineering, technology and service that has

allowed them to increase their share of world markets. They have done this by

excelling in areas that demand constant, incremental innovation. The purchase

price of a specialised machine may be less important than its reliability and

the support and services that are sold with it.

The state has helped with research support as well as with the Hartz reforms,

doling out cash in support of industries that it thinks are important areas of

growth such as green energy, security or biotechnology. It supports an

extensive research infrastructure that small and medium-sized firms can tap

into when they need help, lowering the barriers to innovation. The Fraunhofer

research centres spend about 1.6 billion a year and employ more than 18,000

people. Most of their work (and about two-thirds of their funding) is related

to helping firms with specific projects.

Green machine

The government has tried to create winners as well as support them. Germany s

growing green-energy industries are largely creations of the state. Generous

subsidies have made the country the world s biggest market for solar-power

installations. It may have sucked up half of global production in 2010. Almost

a quarter of patents awarded in 2007 for renewable-energy technologies went to

German firms.

The results of this have been mixed. On the German bank of the river Oder stand

factories that the government had hoped would be world-beaters in making

photovoltaic cells. But they have been undercut by Asian competitors which now

supply most of the gleaming modules sprouting in Bavarian fields. Germans have,

though, become top dogs at making the machines that make the cells: Manz

Automation is one of the biggest producers of equipment used to make thin-film

solar cells. Three-quarters of its machines are sold to Asia.

Germany s success in emerging markets is a source of both pride and

vulnerability, for it would be hard hit were growth there to slow. The extent

to which exports to a single market China have flattered the income statements

of German firms is worrying. Growth in many of Germany s other markets, in the

euro area and beyond, is already sluggish. This year looks as if it will be

harder than last.

Moreover, Germany still has hard work ahead of it. The services sector, despite

some liberalisation (for instance, in retailing) is still underdeveloped. A

system of schooling that has proved reliable in turning out industrial workers

needs an overhaul (see article). For all of the success of German firms in

exporting goods, some German banks made the mistake of buying American mortgage

debts. The banking system, especially the publicly owned bit, is yet to recover

fully.

None of these problems is insurmountable and Germany, unlike many countries,

has the time and budget to deal with them. The risk, however, is that Germany

may choose to bask in its triumph and to slip back into old habits, suppressing

domestic demand and focusing all its efforts on exporting more. We are living

a bit on borrowed time in a sweet spot where the deficit countries haven t yet

adjusted, says Deutsche Bank s Mr Mayer. One of the big risks is complacency.