💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 2622.gmi captured on 2023-09-08 at 18:29:07. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Dark energy and flat Universe exposed by simple method

2010-11-25 13:46:45

By Jason Palmer Science and technology reporter, BBC News

Researchers have developed a simple technique that adds evidence to the theory

that the Universe is flat.

Moreover, the method - developed by revisiting a 30-year-old idea - confirms

that "dark energy" makes up nearly three-quarters of the Universe.

The research, published in Nature, uses existing data and relies on fewer

assumptions than current approaches.

Author Christian Marinoni says the idea turns estimating the Universe's shape

into "primary school" geometry.

While the idea of the Earth being flat preoccupied the first philosophers

millennia ago, the question of whether the Universe itself is flat remains a

debatable topic.

The degree to which the Universe is curved has an effect on what astronomers

see when they look into the cosmos.

A telescope on or near Earth may see an image of a celestial object differently

from how the object actually looks, because the very fabric of space and time

bends the light coming from it.

Christian Marinoni and Adeline Buzzi of the University of Provence have made

use of this phenomenon in their technique.

Dark prospect

The current model of cosmology holds that only 4% of what makes up our Universe

is normal matter - the stuff of stars and planets with which we are familiar,

and that astronomers can see directly.

Start Quote

Once you measure the abundance of matter and energy in the Universe, you have

direct information on its geometry; you can do geometry as we learn in primary

school

End Quote Christian Marinoni University of Provence

The overwhelming majority of the Universe, the theory holds, is composed of

dark matter and dark energy. They are "dark" because they evidently do not

absorb, emit and reflect light like normal matter, making direct views

impossible.

Dark energy - purported to make up 73% of the known Universe - was proposed as

the source of the ongoing expansion of everything in the cosmos. Astronomers

have also observed that this expansion of the Universe seems to be

accelerating.

Even though gravity holds that everything should attract everything else, in

every direction astronomers look there is evidence that things are in fact

moving apart - with those objects further away moving faster.

Dark energy is believed to pervade the essence of space and time, forcing a

kind of "anti-gravity" that fits cosmologists' equations but that is otherwise

a mysterious quantity.

"The problem is that we do not see dark energy because it doesn't emit light,

so we cannot measure it by designing a new machine, a new telescope," explained

Professor Marinoni.

"What we have to do is to devise a new mathematical framework that allows us to

dig into this mystery," he told BBC News.

Circular reasoning

The technique used in this study was first proposed in 1979 by researchers at

the universities of Princeton and Berkeley in the US.

It relies on measuring the degree to which images of far-flung astronomical

objects are a distortion of their real appearance. The authors originally

suggested a spherical object would work.

The way the image is distorted should shed light on both the curvature of the

Universe and the recipe of matter, dark matter and dark energy it is composed

of.

The problem until now has been to choose an object whose real, local appearance

can be known with certainty.

Professor Marinoni and Dr Buzzi's idea was to use a number of binary galaxies -

pairs of galaxies that orbit each other.

Sloan Digital Sky Survey telescope (SPL) The idea was checked using data from

the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Since nature shows no preference for the direction these galaxies would be

orbiting one another, a look across the whole sky should spot the full spectrum

of orbital planes - up, down, left, right, side-on and so on.

Put all of them together and they should approximate a sphere.

The team formed a kind of average of all of those binary galaxies, and

corrected for the varying speeds at which the galaxies might be orbiting each

other.

The calculation also takes into account the relative proportion of dark energy

in the Universe.

The equation was then juggled until the collection of binaries did indeed look

like a uniform mix of directions.

The results suggest that the Universe is made up of about 70% dark energy.

"In general relativity, there is a direct connection between geometry and

dynamics," Professor Marinoni explained, "so that once you measure the

abundance of matter and energy in the Universe, you have direct information on

its geometry; you can do geometry as we learn in primary school."

The team's conclusions suggest the Universe is indeed flat - an assumption

first put forth by Albert Einstein and seemingly confirmed by more recent

observations but that remains one of the most difficult ideas to put on solid

theoretical footing.

Alan Heavens, a theoretical astrophysicist at the University of Edinburgh, said

that the strength of the result lies in that it requires few assumptions about

the nature of the cosmos.

"The problem that Marinoni and Buzzi have attacked is to see if we can get

another, rather clean way of working out what the geometry of the Universe is

without going through some fairly indirect reasoning, which is what we do at

the moment," Professor Heavens told BBC News.

"They get complete consistency with [results from] existing methods, so there's

nothing surprising coming out - thankfully - but it's a neat idea because it

really goes rather directly from observations to conclusions."

However, while the abundance of dark energy seems on an ever-firmer footing,

its nature remains a mystery.

"I don't think it can tell us in a lot of detail what the dark energy is,"

Professor Heavens said. "I think it's probably not precise enough - certainly

not yet."