💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 1045.gmi captured on 2023-09-08 at 18:55:08. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2009-02-18 13:21:15
Half of the charges levelled at the founders of the Pirate Bay file-sharing
site have been dropped.
Swedish prosecutors dropped charges relating to "assisting copyright
infringement" leaving the lesser charges of "assisting making available
copyright material" on trial day two.
Pirate Bay co-founder Frederik Neij said it showed prosecutors had
misunderstood the technology.
The music industry played down the changes as "simplifying the charges".
Peter Danowsky, legal counsel for the music companies in the case, said: "It's
a largely technical issue that changes nothing in terms of our compensation
claims and has no bearing whatsoever on the main case against The Pirate Bay.
"In fact it simplifies the prosecutor's case by allowing him to focus on the
main issue, which is the making available of copyrighted works."
The Pirate Bay was launched in 2003 and quickly established itself as the
world's most high profile file-sharing website. In February 2009, it reported
22 million simultaneous users.
At the start of the trial in Stockholm, Frederik Neij, Gottfrid Svartholm Warg,
Peter Sunde Kolmsioppi and Carl Lundstorm were facing a large fine and up to
two years in prison, if convicted.
"This is a sensation. It is very rare to win half the target in just one and a
half days and it is clear that the prosecutor took strong note of what we said
yesterday," defence lawyer Per E Samuelson told the TorrentFreak website, which
reports on developments in the BitTorrent file-sharing community.
BitTorrent is a legal application used by many file-sharers to swap content
because of the fast and efficient way it distributes files.
No copyright content is hosted on The Pirate Bay's web servers; instead the
site hosts "torrent" links to TV, film and music files held on its users
computers.
Your reactions:
At the turn of the century lobbyists proclaimed that travelling in a
steam-driven train at the mindboggling speed of 20 mph would suffocate and kill
you. This nonsense came from rigid old fashioned entrepreneurs who couldn't
cope with the tide of time, and the change in technology that comes with it.
Nor can the media barons of large companies and if they can't they will
subsequently disappear and others will take over. The trial is at best
entertainment but of no significance what so ever! Fredrik, Malmo, Sweden
I agree that sharing copyrighted materials is a violation of law, but at the
same time the companies themselves legally enforce their own laws in the
software they release in the name "Terms of use" or " EULA " which you have to
click on it to install the program. It contains usually a very sophisticated
term that serves to protect the company in the first place. Shamoel, Sweden
I sincerely hope that the media firms fail miserably in this endeavour. They
need to recognize that websites like the Pirate Bay and people like Mr. Sunde
and his colleagues will be around for quite a while mostly in response to their
dreadful business tactics. These firms don't even have a valid accusation:
"It's a trial that regards four individuals that have conducted a big
commercial business making money out of others' file-sharing works,
copyright-protected movies...". What business? None of these bit-torrent
trackers are a business! Most of their money goes right back into the site
itself! Any money they make has got to be a fraction of the ridiculous amount
these lawyers are asking for! And none of the "infringing material" is found on
their servers anyway! It'll set a welcome legal precedent when the firms lose
and TPB gets to continue freely, and the media bullies can leave with their
tails between their legs. Good luck TPB crew! Zenman, New York, NY
If you can get something for nothing, why buy it? This is theft, pure and
simple, and it deprives the creators of the profits they have earned and that
they need to produce more content. Daniel Guida, La Mesa, California, USA
I'm with Pirate Bay on this one as the entertainment industry has been ripping
off consumers for decades and now with the digital age it's time to stuff a few
of these companies If they ain't prepared to keep apace with technology and
offer their product at a reasonable price then they're finished. And as far as
the law goes, these two lads are in the right - they are not responsible
themselves for distributing the il(legal) content. So, stuff the industry. Les,
Elgin
Regardless of whether or not I can download content from sources on the net,
legally or illegally, I still buy CDs, DVDs, video games & books. I think most,
not all, people, like myself, use the internet to get a better idea of a
product before they purchase it. I'd rather know that an album has only the one
song on it that I like that I've already heard on the radio many, many times
before I go and buy a copy, only to be disappointed. That's just me, though,
but I know I can't be that unique or original in my thinking. Amy, Portland,
Oregon, USA