💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › mediocregopher › 3244 captured on 2023-07-22 at 17:31:22. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: "Reverse proxy for gemini vhosts"
MITM all connections would _technically_ work, but I think at that point I would just not support it. That would essentially tie the backend to the proxy permanently, if the backend does anything with client certs, which wouldn't work for my case.
But luckily, after a bit of research, it seems it's possible to do it transparently. Since the TLS Client Hello message is sent plaintext at the start of the message, the server should be able to read just that, parse it, then forward it and the rest of the connection to the correct backend.
— https://jean.ribes.ovh/gemini-reverse-proxy-using-traefik/#navbar-end
If traefik can do it, I can do it.
2023-07-18 · 4 days ago
I should say that a HTTPS reverse proxy would have the same problem if a client cert is used
Forwarding the connection does sound like a much better solution. It is beyond my level of expertise to evaluate whether it's a good idea, though... A reverse proxy that forwards TLS connections without modifying them seems like something that is pretty much protocol-agnostic?
An HTTPS reverse proxy _would_ have the same problem if client certs were used, but fortunately (for http proxies) http client certs aren't really a thing.
And @skyjake yeah, it's a pretty protocol agnostic solution, which I guess is why traefik supports it despite almost certainly not deliberately supporting gemini. But it also precludes modifying HTTP headers on requests and such (like adding X-Forwarded-For), which I guess is why it's not more common in http proxies.
Peaking the TLS SNI is the best way to go. The disadvantage is that if the client doesn't send the SNI, or if the SNI doesn't match the actual URL inside the gemini request, you're kind of screwed.
Also check out the PROXY protocol, which allows you to attach client information like the true IP address in the absence of having access to HTTP headers. I added support for this to jetforce although I'm not using it currently.
https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.8/doc/proxy-protocol.txt
hello, i am trying to understand, if we have such a solution now?
based on what i read (and hopefully understand) i would prefer a server that forwards requests to different ports depending on domain name. but without doing mitm, i guess it can just forward everything back and forth?
2023-07-21 · 1 day ago
i as referred to this thread
@norayr the problem is that the proxy has to determine the hostname in the unencrypted part of the TLS protocol, which apparently works, but it unusual (the solution provided by relayd seems to work)
— => Here's an NGINX config that uses SNI to do what you're asking. Cheers
relayd? hmmm... did anyone already configure some capsules like that? can i find some example configurations somewhere?
24 hours ago
omg let me see!
@norayr I'm not sure why relayd was brought up, but both the link about traefik that I posted earlier and the nginx config that Addison posted should be able to help
15 hours ago
@mediocregopher sorry that was mentioned somewhere else on the same topic, I confused the "channels"
11 hours ago
Reverse proxy for gemini vhosts — Reverse proxy for gemini I'm looking into writing a reverse proxy server which supports Gemini. ideally I'd like it to work like an HTTP reverse proxy like nginx or caddy, where it directs requests to different backend servers depending on the hostname. The problem is... is this even really possible, given that client certs are a thing? How can the proxy serve the connection long enough to figure out a hostname, and still proxy it to the backend server with...