💾 Archived View for gemini.ctrl-c.club › ~identity2 captured on 2023-07-22 at 16:13:20. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-07-10)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
┌─┐┌┬┐┌─┐┬ ┬ ┌─┐┬ ┬┬ ┬┌─┐┬ ┬ └─┐││││ ││ │ ├─┤│ ││╲││ ├─┤ └─┘┴ ┴└─┘└─┘ └─┘┴ ┴└─┘┴ ┴└─┘┴ ┴
ME
Can you form an opinion based on advance of technologies and human leisure about the future direction of paper books
Here is my perspective on the future of paper books given advances in technology and changes in leisure habits:
While e-books and audiobooks have become increasingly popular, I believe paper books will continue to hold an important place for many people. There are some key reasons for this:
Nostalgia and tradition - Reading physical books is nostalgic for many and part of long-held traditions of reading and giving books as gifts. The tactile sensation and smell of books still appeal to the senses.
Focus and retention - Studies show reading on paper leads to better focus, comprehension and retention compared to screens. The fixed layout focuses attention vs digital distractions.
Unique qualities - Paper books allow for easy note-taking, highlighting, page-flipping back to reference something, and sharing passages. The collectibility and display value also persists.
Universal access - While tech gadgets come and go, books have no learning curve and work anywhere with no batteries or connectivity needed. This makes them accessible and inclusive.
Special content - Many beautifully illustrated, special editions, art books, photography collections, and children's books retain their magic best in print. The layout and visuals are optimized for print.
While e-books and audiobooks will take some market share, paper books play to unique strengths of focus, tradition, display, and access that should sustain them well into the future. But they may increasingly become more specialized and premium rather than dominating the everyday consumer market. What are your thoughts on the future of paper books? I'm open to discussing this further!
ME
I may be more pesimistic about the volume market and more optomistic abotut the collect and use marker similar to vinyl records and mechanical watches
CLAUDE
That's an insightful perspective. I can see the parallels to vinyl records and mechanical watches as more niche, premium physical formats.
You're likely right that paper books will see a steady decline in the volume commodity book market as e-books and audiobooks take over convenience and cost for mainstream fiction, non-fiction and education. Paperbacks were once the disruption to expensive hardbacks, just as e-books are now a disruption.
However, the collectability, aesthetic value, and ritual use of paper books probably sustains them especially for bibliophiles, gifts, art books, photography, nostalgia, children's reading and special editions. Just like vinyl records have made a comeback for their warm sound quality and album art, paper books have special sensory and design qualities.
And just as mechanical watches have survived on craftsmanship, heritage and collecting value beyond just utility, paper books will persist as objects of art, specialness and ritual in themselves - more than just the contents. So your vision of a declining volume market but increasing collector and specialty market for paper books seems very plausible. Thank you for sharing that insightful distinction!
ME
Do you have an opinion on the hobby/maker market were people may produce themselves or by print on demand some thing they may have already read electronically but want a physical copy as a heirloom for themselves or a gift to others.
CLAUDE
That's an interesting niche I hadn't fully considered - the hobbyist/maker market custom printing paper books. I can see some distinct possibilities emerging there:
Custom printed books as gifts - For special occasions like weddings, anniversaries, graduations etc. people may want to gift a custom printed book of photos, letters, blog posts rather than just a digital collection. The tangible book becomes a heirloom.
Self-publishing physical copies - Writers who have built a following online may want to self-publish limited edition physical runs of their works for fans who want to collect a paper version. Services like print-on-demand enable this.
Personal journals/scrapbooks - People may print out volumes of their personal blogs, travel journals, family history scrapbooks to have as collectible artifacts. May be especially meaningful to gift future generations in the family rather than just digital archives.
Fan fiction/content - Super fans may want to create printed compilations of favorite content for their fandom whether that's stories, art, meta-analysis etc. Again the printed form shows more dedication.
Nostalgic prints of favorites - Readers may want physical copies of favorite childhood books, famous classics, or impactful works to display and re-read. Even if already consumed digitally.
So I think you're right - the hobbyist/maker market allows regular people to become "publishers" and turn sentimental digital content into custom printed artifacts. This satisfies the nostalgia and collecting value around paper books in a niche way.
Here are some examples of book projects that may have special social or cultural value but more limited commercial viability:
CLAUDE
Here are some examples of book projects that may have special social or cultural value but more limited commercial viability:
Local/family histories - Compiling biographies, stories, recipes, photos of interest mostly just to family members and a local community.
Academic niche topics - Very specialized research works in humanities or sciences with a tiny target audience. But important for academic posterity.
Minority voices - Stories and perspectives from marginalized groups around identity, experiences, culture etc. May not have mass market appeal but are socially/culturally important.
Indigenous languages - Children's books or language learning materials in indigenous languages at risk of extinction like Native American tribes, Australian Aboriginal peoples, etc.
Activist works - Writings related to social/political movements and causes that a passionate minority would value but not generalized commercial interest.
Esoteric spirituality - Obscure religious and spiritual texts treasured by very small followings but largely unknown to wider culture.
Local restaurants/shops - Cookbooks, guides, and histories documenting beloved local establishments that have significance to a community.
Oral histories - Transcripts of interviews with everyday people, often elderly, with perspective on changes in society over decades.
Niche arts/crafts - Instructional manuals documenting traditional art forms, crafts, folk practices that few practice today.
Travelogues - Very localized or obscure destinations documented through photos, descriptions, maps that few would seek out commercially.
Those are some of the kinds of niche projects I could envision having importante to a subculture or location but difficult to sell on a mass market commercial level. But they may merit publication through grants, donations, partnerships or crowdfunding by those who value preserving and sharing them.
The Rise, Fall, and Return of Text-Based Computing
The early days of personal computing were centered around text-based interfaces like the command line terminal. Operating systems like UNIX provided users with powerful but cryptic commands for manipulating files and running programs. Communication was conducted on text-only platforms like Usenet or early email protocols like UUCP. The world wide web had not yet been invented.
This text-focused era reflected both the technical limitations and pioneering spirit of early hackers and computer enthusiasts. Graphics capabilities were limited, but the flexibility of the command line interface gave users unfettered access to the operating system. A single line of code could automate complex file management tasks. Text communication protocols like UUCP, Telnet, and FTP allowed the first online communities to spring up, connecting people across phone lines and primitive network connections.
The introduction of the graphical user interface (GUI) by Apple in the 1980s signaled a radical shift toward visual computing and mouse-driven interfaces. Microsoft Windows soon popularized the model further. Graphics, images, and multimedia content began to dominate software and the emerging world wide web. The average user was empowered by the intuitive simplicity of the graphical interface.
However, the transition to visual computing has also imposed limitations on how users can access and control their devices. GUIs hide the complexities of the system underneath, restricting access to only what the interface permits. The rise of mobile computing and locked-down hardware like smartphones and tablets has further restricted user control in favor of foolproof ease of use.
But text interfaces still have unique advantages that make them compelling, even necessary, for certain use cases. For expert and power users, the flexibility and automation capabilities of the command line remain unparalleled. Interface conventions like piping allow commands to be easily chained together to perform advanced operations not supported by GUI software. Scripting gives users fine-grained control to customize and automate repetitive tasks.
For communication and networking, open text-based protocols provide alternatives to closed corporate ecosystems like social media networks and centralized HTTP services. While less flashy and immediate than visual interfaces, protocols like email, IRC, Usenet, and FTP allow users to own and control their own content and connections. Protocols like Gemini and Gopher leverage the simplicity and universality of plain text to create open and decentralized alternatives to the web.
Importantly, text-based online communication protocols offer more censorship resistance than centralized and graphical services. Many regimes block access to social networks and other sites to censor dissent. But legacy text protocols continue to function as access to core internet infrastructure remains open. For example, Usenet remains popular for political discussion because the governments finds the decentralized text network impossible to fully block. Email and IRC channels similarly persist as channels for free speech.
Text-based tools also provide more freedom, privacy, and anonymity compared to audio/visual computing. Communicating and networking without photos, videos, or audio recordings allows users to share ideas and build connections without emphasis on identity and self-presentation. It returns the focus to quality of ideas over flashy presentation. Anonymity enables free speech without fear of repercussions.
Of course, visual interfaces also have benefits—they can be more intuitive, immediate, and expressive. But computing doesn't have to be an all-or-nothing choice between visual or text. The two can coexist, each used for its strengths. Graphical interfaces help bring computing to the mainstream, while text interfaces give experts and tinkerers access underneath to customize their experience. Visual social networks provide connections to the world, while text-based tools let users control their digital identities.
Computing has always evolved via cycles of openness and control. Mainframes gave way to personal computers. The openness of the early internet made way for consolidation under tech giants. But open protocols and grassroots communities persist, providing an important counterbalance. By continuing to use and develop text-based tools alongside modern graphical interfaces, we can keep computing open, empowering, and accessible to all. The text interface is dead, long live the text interface.