š¾ Archived View for idiomdrottning.org āŗ feldstein captured on 2023-07-10 at 13:54:36. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
ā¬ ļø Previous capture (2022-07-16)
ā”ļø Next capture (2024-08-18)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
OK, so reading up a bit on Al Feldsteinās process; he would start on page one and hand write in pencil directly on the bristol board, writing the text and indicating narration plates and speech bubbles, but no art. As in, he was writing it in one go. If he found himself on page five out of eight, heād be like āOK, time to start writing towards a goal in this šā.
Then heād send it to Jim Wroten whoād, in ink, put in lettering, balloons and panels. And only then once all that was in place, the artist (often Feldstein himself) would go to work on that same board.
Sienkiewicz has a similar method: step one panels & handlettering with nary a sketch, step two art. For his own writing, at leastāI wonder how he worked with Claremont or Miller, both of whom famously preferred āMarvel Methodā: loose outline, artist breaks down and layouts and finishes art, āscripterā adds text post-hoc.
On the next page (this is āChild of Tomorrowā, p186), Feldstein comments on the Marvel Method:
āWell. I remembered after ā we were put out of business, and I was doing Mad ā that I had heard Marvel, Stan Lee, that they were doing the artwork first, and then writing the story around it, or something. Weird things that were going on that I never quite understood ā how they could successfully produce a viable story by reversing the whole process.ā
Thing is. Text is more mutable than art. Itās easier to rewrite a sentence than to redraw a panel. But this goes both ways: you might wanna do text first because then you can iterateāthatās how Japanese comics are made, editors approve or suggest changes to a storyboard, and then the second iteration is the comicā but thatās not what Feldstein was doing. After the story conference he went upstairs and wrote directly on the final board from page one through page eight. So itās a worst of both worlds method (that apparently worked because his comics were brilliant).
He didnāt take advantage of the iterativability of text-first or the mutability of text-last. In a text-last method like the Marvel Method, you could write words that perfectly suited the nuances in a facial expression or pose. Yāall know Claremont is my favorite writer because of how well he worked in that framework. Just making those panels come to life with thought and emotion.