gemini - kennedy.gemi.dev

💾 Archived View for sdf.org › loopdreams › phlog › june_13.txt captured on 2023-06-16 at 16:39:15.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Sun 13 Jun 20:45:49 KST 2021

Fake Plastic Trees

I currently live in what you could maybe call a 'suburb' of Seoul.
I guess when you think of suburbs you think of sprawling streets
with houses and lawns. So, in that sense, my town is not a suburb.
But, if you imagine stacking all those houses on top of each other
- stretching between fifteen and thirty stories - and imagine all
the green lawns as 'communal' gardens, then, yes, it is a suburb.

It certainly serves a similar function to conventional suburbs - it
allows families to remain close to a metropolitan area (for work),
whilst also providing a safe, quasi-utopian space in which the
family can dwell, play, attend high-performing schools, eat well,
drink lots of coffee, go camping, bike together, and, well, most
anything 'wholesome' you can imagine doing together as a family.

When I first moved to Korea I lived in a city close to the airport
for a month. It was my first impression of the country. The city
was tiny, but tall and densely packed. You could walk across the
whole thing in 30 minutes, but it had everything you needed.
Anyway, I really liked it and was eager to see more of Korea.

I soon learned that the look and feel of this initial city was not
unique. The city that I eventually moved to (my current one) was
very similar, and so were so many other 'suburb' areas I had
visited. At first, this was great. All the restaurants and shops I
had gotten used to in the first month also existed in the new city
and looked identical. I had no problem navigating and living in the
new place. It seems like 90% of all businesses in Korea are
franchises (don't quote me on that number). So, most commercial
areas end up looking alike. However, even more striking than this
is that the general 'layout' of places is quite similar. There are
usually tallish building 'blocks', around 10 stories high, that are
filled with all kinds of businesses and services. Then there are
even taller residential apartment buildings. The buildings
themselves all look alike architecturally. Travelling from
suburb-city to suburb-city is a bit bizarre, there is a lot of
repetition.

It's not like going from high-street to high-street in Ireland, for
example, where you will also see the same businesses over and over
again. The scale of the cities in Korea make the repetition far
more striking. Another common sight is apartment buildings that are
'in-progress'. The 'edges' of the suburb-cities aren't really
edges, they are just zones where new suburb-cities are constantly
being built.

The city I'm in now is much newer than the fist place I stayed. I
still hesitate to call them 'cities' - they are small in terms of
walking/traversing, but still busy and decked out like cities. When
I knew I would be moving here I looked up my address on google
maps, and switched to the street view. All I saw was empty fields.
When I actually got here, there were dozens of tall buildings in
that spot. I also learned at this point how useless google services
are in Korea - they have all their own replacement services for
maps, email, etc.

Anyway, the point is, it's still new. Coming from Europe, it's
pretty weird to live in a city that's probably less than a decade
old. At first, the 'newness' felt sterile and artificial. My first
association was a memory of playing Final Fantasy 8 as a kid - at
the beginning there is a training centre or something that looks a
bit utopian and futuristic. Not only did the buildings and parks
seem new and uniform, but the people did too! Perhaps Covid added
to this effect a bit - only being surrounded by 'masked' faces can
perhaps produce a sensation of dehumanisation/uniformity. I
realised just how 'new' the place was pretty quickly by the fact
that all the trees were tied together for support. On the way to
work a few weeks ago, I spotted several, much larger, trees in the
process of being planted. I tried to get a quick picture, but I
didn't want to feel too rude/creepy taking too many pictures of
places where families were all making their way to school.


That evening, on the way home from work, the trees had all been
planted and they actually looked great. If you didn't think about
the fact that they had just been planted and were all tied to one
another, they gave the impression of 'age' and 'grandeur' to the
buildings they surrounded.

The artificiality of the place never bothered me too much though. I
could appreciate it what it was for - a safe, happy place for young
families. I've always preferred either open countryside (similar to
where I grew up), or else more 'grimy' urban settings, where things
are busy and lively and a bit chaotic. But, as lukewarm as this
city is, it definitely grew on me over the past year.

Recently, though, I've started appreciating it for a new reason.
There's something about how and why it was made that is important
at a deeper level.

- How it was made: it was built quickly and efficiently - it
  provides high-quality dwellings and services to a huge number of
  people. I don't know how they did it exactly, but it must take a
  lot of knowledge, organisation, money etc.

- Why it was made: I'm not sure how 'urgent' these suburb-cities
  are, but judging by how busy they are, and how more and more keep
  being built, it seems there is plenty of 'demand'.

There have been numerous stories recently about the effects of
climate change at the local level. Towns and entire cities are
becoming more vulnerable to things like floods and fires. People
have started to think about the question of the mass migration and
mass resettlement that will be needed when certain places become
near-uninhabitable.

This is where the practical knowledge that went into constructing
the 'fake plastic city' I live in will come into play. Whose to say
that this kind of setup isn't one that will become the default in
the future? Or, perhaps only a certain portion of resettled people
will be able to afford to live somewhere like this, maybe the rest
will live in things like 'tiny-homes', or shanty towns, or live
nomadically.

Or, perhaps people will never give up their 'land'. That is
something you don't get here - no garden, no land, little 'personal
space'. The space is shared, highly-communal. Outside your
apartment, there is nowhere really to be 'alone'. No fields to
wander or quiet roads to cycle. Even going hiking here is a bit
bizzare - there are hundreds of other people around, and you can
buy coffee and beer at many summits. Still, though, you get used to
it. Maybe there will be no choice in the future.

There is a scene in the HBO miniseries Chernobyl when the people of
Pripyat have to be evacuated. They are all forced into buses and
shipped off to neighbouring cities. I remember listening to the
podcast accompanying the series at the time, and the creator said
that the Soviet government actually built another version of
Pripyat, about 100km away. It's hard to imagine 50,000 Americans or
Irishmen being bused off to a newly built version of their city.
But, maybe, when the time comes, there'll be no choice. I just
hope I'll be bused somewhere with a Daiso nearby.