💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 444.gmi captured on 2023-06-16 at 21:34:13. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Our laws are not the world's laws

2008-02-01 10:01:00

>>So if we can prosecute swedish people for crimes that aren't crimes in their

country can we also give speeding tickets to drivers on the autobahn that drive

over 55 mph?

Apparently the government thinks so. The US government recently had a Canadian

arrested on Canadian soil for selling marijuana seeds on the internet

(something that's not illegal in Canada). At no time did this person set foot

on American soil, nor did he ever break Canadian law. Everything he did was

above board right down to declaring exactly what he did on his Canadian tax

return and paying taxes on the income. All profits were even donated to

charity.

Yet the US government felt that they had the right to arrest him. More info

here: http://canadianpress.google.com/article/

ALeqM5h9Y7CVPeypqV77yWBmI45x_mP9SA [google.com].

Posted: 2008084@588.61

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

stranger

>>>>> I think the problem in that particular case is that the Canadian in

question supplied marijuana to people living under USA jurisdiction. If orders

from people living in the USA had not been accepted, and deliveries not made to

locations under USA jurisdiction, then yes, you can complain about

extra-territoriality

He broke no Canadian laws - it's the Americans that broke the law by buying. He

never advertised in the US, nor did he ever solicit their business. If you sold

something on ebay that was legal in the US, but broke the laws of the country

of the person who bought it, would you accept extradition to that country to

rot in their jails?

>>>>> As it is, the USA have applied to extradite the Canadian, and Canada

have not demurred, and the request is not being fought by the extraditee.

Thats not the whole story. He's only not fighting extridition because they were

threatening to sue/arrest his coworkers and friends - one who has a medical

condition and would have likely died in a US prison. He nor his friends have

any money to fight these constant lawsuits that the US government has been

firing at him for the last 20 years.

Posted: 2008084@589.98

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

stranger

With that argument, you must necessarily believe that anyone who posts on the

Internet is bound by the speech restrictions of every country that has citizens

with Internet access. Better not post anything unpleasant about China; that's

illegal there, and by allowing your data to be sent there, you are breaking

their law and should be charged.

Unless he crossed into the United States to mail his items, United States

criminal system should have *NO* jurisdiction. To hold otherwise is to open

extraterritoriality floodgates; I'm sure you wouldn't be comfortable with the

results.