💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 3630.gmi captured on 2023-06-16 at 19:21:46. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2011-12-13 08:21:03
Dec 12th 2011, 13:09 by Buttonwood
THE grand bargain postulated before last week's fruition - that the euro zone
governments would agree a fiscal pact in return for the ECB buying lots of
government bonds - hasn't quite happened. But perhaps it is being done via a
different route.
The ECB did agree to lend money on extended terms to European banks, and
relaxed its collateral rules. The move was generally welcomed as a sign that
Europe was ready to stop a Lehman-type collapse resulting from the freeze in
the interbank lending markets.
But euro zone leaders have been hinting quite broadly that the banks can take
that money from the ECB at 1% and invest the proceeds in government bonds, and
earn a very nice yield premium along the way. This is a sort of back door QE,
or perhaps bank door QE is the better name for it. In the early 1990s, the Fed
deliberately engineered an upward-sloping yield curve to allow US banks to
rebuild their balance sheets after the savings & loan crisis; borrowing at 3%
and investing in Treasury bonds at 6-7%.
There are some questions over whether banks will take this risk, given that
they might have to mark to market any losses on their government bond holdings.
And there is no sign yet that this bargain is having much of an effect on bond
yields.
Of course, this bargain is on a cynical view, like two drowning men hanging on
to each other; bankrupt banks supporting bankrupt governments. The taxpayer
stands behind both, of course, but this kind of deal is designed to create an
implicit commitment on the part of taxpayers without making the costs explicit
to voters.