💾 Archived View for spam.works › mirrors › textfiles › ufo › canada.txt captured on 2023-06-16 at 20:44:05.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors
From: rutkows@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Chris Rutkowski)
Subject: UFOs in Canada
Message-ID: <C6AxLp.4tw@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
Summary: The annual report on UFOs in Canada for 1992
Keywords: Canada,UFO,report,UFOROM,1992
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1993 14:58:36 GMT
Lines: 994
*
^^^^^^^^^^^
/ .................. \
===========================
+ +
The 1992
CANADIAN UFO SURVEY
Compiled by
Chris A. Rutkowski
Contributors: ____________
Paul Anderson
Roy Bauer
Grant Cameron
Daniel Clairmont
Graham Conway
Lorne Goldfader
Robert Hawkes
Gordon Kijek
Victor Lourenco
Christian Page
Michael Strainic
Tom Theophanous
Ruth Walde
Bonnie Wheeler
Published by
Ufology Research of Manitoba
Box 1918
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Canada R3C 3R2
Converted into ASCII for disseminating in the Internet by
David Thacker
The 1992 Canadian UFO Survey
Since 1989, UFO case data has been solicited from all known and active
investigators and researchers in Canada for analyses and comparison with
other compilations. Before that time, individual researchers would
normally maintain their own files, with little or no communication with
others. Even representatives of major UFO organizations often do not
regularly submit case data, and the parent organizations themselves tend
not to do much analyses with the data they do receive.
After favourable responses from the publication of previous Canadian
UFO Surveys, UFOROM decided to continue the systematic collection of raw
UFO report data in Canada and prepare yearly reports for general
circulation. It has been always felt that the dissemination of such data
would be of great advantage to researchers, so it is presented here once
again as data with some analysis.
The response from Canadian researchers to requests for 1992 data was
better than in previous years. More cases were submitted from more
investigators, including those in Ontario, resulting in a marked increase
in the number of cases used in the analyses. While this prevents direct
comparisons with previous years, this has the advantage of being more
comprehensive. There are still those researchers, however, who, for
whatever reasons, do not submit cases for the annual survey. In addition,
some researchers do not maintain useable case files and do not retain
quantitative criteria in their investigations (for example, contactee
groups). It is now suspected that only a small fraction of "active"
ufologists and self-proclaimed "researchers" actually investigate cases and
maintain useable records.
In 1989, 141 UFO reports were obtained for analysis. In 1990, 194
reports were recorded. In 1991, 165 reports were received. In 1992, 223
cases were examined. These reports came from contributing investigators'
files, press clippings and the files of the National Research Council of
Canada. The NRC routinely receives UFO reports from private citizens and
from RCMP, civic police and military personnel.
The number of cases in 1992 represents a 35% increase over the
previous year, which had been a 15% decrease from that of 1990. Assuming
an average of 180 cases per year, the variation is uniform in either
direction, and we can suggest that the number of UFO reports per year in
Canada is relatively constant, even allowing for the influx of cases from
new contributors.
In 1992, there were apparent significant increases in the number of
reports in Manitoba, while there was an apparent decrease in reports in
Alberta and Quebec. As usual, British Columbia represents the largest
fraction of UFO reports of all the provinces. Since 1990, BC has garnered
between 35% and 40% of the total number of cases per year. As mentioned in
previous annual reports, this is partly due to the highly efficient UFO
reporting system in that province, and the comparatively large number of
active investigators. The rest of the Provinces appear to have had average
numbers of reports in 1991.
TABLE 1
Distribution of UFO Reports by Province
BC AB SK MB ON PQ NB PEI NS NF YK NWT
1989 15 16 18 22 34 28 1 - 3 3 - 1
1990 76 9 10 20 21 36 7 3 5 4 1 2
1991 59 22 7 6 30 16 9 1 7 4 1 -
1992 90 8 9 23 56 10 9 - 3 4 3 1
The monthly breakdowns of reports during each year show slightly
different patterns from those of previous years. In 1989, there was a
significant increase in UFO reports in the late fall, with other months
maintaining what appeared to be a fairly constant "normal" level of
reports. But 1990 saw two major increases in report numbers in two months:
April and August. The "normal" level of monthly report numbers appeared to
be constant in other months, with minor fluctuations. In 1991, reports
peaked in August, but there was no single obvious trough, and there were an
abnormally large number of reports in the winter months. The 1992
breakdown again shows no clear trend in monthly distribution. In fact,
reports are fairly evenly distributed throughout the year, with no marked
increase in reports in either summer or winter. This is curious, since
previous analyses of UFO reports have almost always shown a peak in the
summer months, as would be expected because most UFO sightings are simple
NLs and there are generally more outdoor observers available during the
summer months. This would be especially expected in Canada, where the
seasonal temperatures vary considerably, and there is much less evening
outdoor activity in the winter. Nevertheless, UFO report numbers were not
significantly less in the winter than in the summer. An average of 18 UFO
reports per month was calculated from the data.
TABLE 2
UFO Reports per Month
J F M A M J J A S O N D
1989 13 9 6 9 5 9 5 5 12 32 27 9
1990 17 7 6 47 10 10 9 47 15 16 10 -
1991 13 7 17 12 7 12 16 25 16 12 11 17
1992 15 16 27 16 22 16 23 19 11 16 21 21
Selecting only the cases labelled "unknown," two peaks are seen: one
in March and the other in July. Other months are distributed more evenly.
While it is tempting to regard these two peaks as real anomalies, given the
relatively small number of cases in the sample, it is more likely that they
are statistical artefacts.
TABLE 2A
Monthly Breakdown of Unknowns
J F M A M J J A S O N D
1992 2 2 8 3 5 4 11 1 3 4 5 1
An analysis by report type shows a similar breakdown to that found in
previous years. The numbers of cases of a particular type remained roughly
constant except for the category of Nocturnal Lights, which exhibited
nearly a twofold increase in 1990. However, numbers of NLs were closer to
a 1989 level in 1991. Relative numbers of specific report types remained
within a close range of previous years' values. Nocturnal lights, for
example, were 60% of all reports in 1989, 73% on 1990, 67% in 1991, and 61%
in 1992. In general, NLs can be said to comprise about two-thirds of all
UFO reports.
TABLE 3
UFO Report Types
NL ND DD CE1 CE2 CE3 CE4 EV RD PH
1989 84 20 16 10 7 - 2 2 - -
1990 141 24 15 2 1 - 4 3 - -
1991 110 26 13 7 4 1 2 - 1 1
1992 135 44 20 13 5 2 3 - - 1
For those unfamiliar with the categories, a summary follows:
NL (Nocturnal Light) - light source in night sky
ND (Nocturnal Disc) - light source in night sky that appears to have a
definite shape
DD (Daylight Disc) - unknown object observed during daytime hours
CE1 (Close Encounter of the First Kind) - ND or DD occurring within
200 metres of a witness
CE2 (Close Encounter of the Second Kind) - CE1 where physical effects
left or noted
CE3 (Close Encounter of the Third Kind) - CE1 where figures/entities
are encountered
CE4 (Close Encounter of the Fourth Kind) - an alleged "abduction" or
"contact" experience
EV (Evidence) - a case where physical traces left by an event are the
primary claim
RD (Radar) - UFOs observed on radar
PH (Photograph) - photograph(s) of a UFO, but no actual sighting
The category of Nocturnal Disc was created by UFOROM for
differentiation within its own report files. Similarly, Evidence is also
an ad hoc creation, and may not be applicable by other researchers.
Normally, Evidence would include such physical traces as "crop circles",
"landing rings" and "saucer nests". However, in 1990 there was a great
increase in the numbers of such traces discovered in North America, and it
was decided to treat these as separate from UFO reports in these Surveys.
[For the record, there were 27 "crop circles" and related traces discovered
in Canada in 1990, 39 in 1991, and 46 in 1992. Many of these were
investigated by UFO researchers, and a few were reported to the NRC.
UFOROM is associated with the North American Institute for Crop Circle
Research, which investigates such cases and publishes separate reports on
its findings.]
The breakdown by evaluative conclusions for 1992 cases can be shown to
be similar to results from previous years. There were three operative
categories: Insufficient Information, Possible or Probable Explanation, and
Unknown. Readers are warned that a classification of Unknown does not
imply that an alien spacecraft was observed; no such interpretation can be
made with certainty, based on the given data (though the probability of
this scenario is admittedly never zero). In most cases, the evaluations
are made subjectively by both the contributing investigators and the
compiler of this report. The category of Unknown is adopted only if the
contributed data or case report contains enough information that a
conventional explanation cannot be satisfactorily proposed. This does not
mean that the case will never be explained, but only that a viable
explanation is not immediately obvious.
In 1992, a change was adopted in order to include Explained cases in
the statistics. While all categories of UFO reports were solicited from
investigators, few included Explained cases in their submissions because
they were not, by definition, unidentified flying objects. However, this
raises several concerns. First, it is known that many UFOs become IFOs
only after moderate investigative efforts. There is no question that many
cases in the Possible or Probable category are in fact IFOs. Second,
previous studies of UFO reports, including Blue Book and the Colorado
project, tabulated IFOs as Explained cases and indicated these conclusions
in their reports. Third, whether consciously or subconsciously,
researchers may discard IFO cases as unnecessary and not submit them for
the total analyses. This will, naturally, skew the statistics in favour of
UFOs. As an illustration, one contributor to the annual survey noted that
"dozens" of other UFO reports were received but not tabulated because they
were immediately discernable as IFOs.
In 1991, two UFO reports were Explained, but not included in the
statistical calculations. In 1992, 17 were Explained, and were used in the
annual breakdown of data.
The hourly distribution of cases tended to follow the same pattern for
1992 as in previous years. There appears to be a peak near 2200 hours
local and a trough around 1000 hours local. In 1992, a secondary peak near
2300 hours local was also evident.
TABLE 4
UFO Reports by Conclusion
1989 1990 1991 1992
# % # % # % # %
Insufficient Info. 74 52.5 90 46.4 80 49.1 83 37
Poss./Prob. Expl. 47 33.3 78 40.2 69 42.3 74 33
Unknown 20 14.2 26 13.4 14 8.6 49 22
Explained - - - - (2) - 17 8
The average number of witnesses per case went down from a value of
2.12/case in 1989 to 1.4/case in 1990, then up again to 1.91/case in 1991.
In 1992, the average number of witnesses was up again, at 2.36/case. It is
not known what this may indicate. It is possible that there might have
been a tendency for only one of a pair or group of witnesses to report an
incident in some situations, and, hence, this value would wax or wane
depending on the social factor. This may have been true in the NRC files,
which may not reflect the total number of witnesses sharing a UFO
experience. However, these figures still show that a typical UFO
experience has more than one witness, supporting the contention that UFO
sightings represent observations of physical phenomena. In fact, other
studies, including the 1992 analyses, suggest that the typical UFO
experience is shared by at least two witnesses.
The category of Duration is interesting in that it represents the
subjective length of time the UFO experience lasted. Naturally, these
times are greatly suspect because it is known that people tend to misjudge
the flow of time. However, some people can be good at estimating time, so
this value has some meaning. Although an estimate of "one hour" may be in
error by several minutes, it is unlikely that the correct value would be,
for example, one minute (disregarding the claims of "missing time" during
the abduction category of experiences). Furthermore, there have been cases
when a UFO was observed and clocked accurately, so that we can be
reasonably certain that UFO events can last considerable periods of time.
The average duration of a sighting can be calculated as a summation of all
given durations then divided by the number of cases with a stated duration.
The resulting value for 1991 was about 12 minutes, down from 19 minutes in
1990. In 1992, the value is again around 12 minutes. This surprisingly
long duration is likely due to the large number of sightings lasting only a
few seconds combined with a few that lasted several hours.
In cases where a colour of an object was reported in 1992, the most
common colour was white (55 cases), followed distantly by red (24 cases).
Other colours were also represented, although there is a noticeable change
from previous years, when green was a dominant colour. Since most UFOs are
nocturnal starlike objects, the abundance of white objects is not
surprising. The green coloured objects were, in general, bolides, which
were seen in significant numbers in 1991 and 1992.
Summary of Results
------------------
As with previous annual Surveys, the 1992 Survey does not offer any
positive proof of the physical reality of UFOs. However, it does show that
some phenomenon which is called a UFO is continually being observed by
witnesses. The typical UFO sighting is that of two people observing a
moving, distant white or red light for a period of over 15 minutes. In
most cases, the UFO is likely to be eventually identified as a conventional
object such as an astronomical object. However, in a small percentage of
cases, some UFOs do not appear to have an easy explanation and they may be
given the label of "unknown".
What are these "unknowns"? An additional classification is useful to
try and better understand this kind of report. In the gathering of data
for the study, a value was assigned for a personal evaluation of the
Reliability of the report. This value gives the likelihood that a UFO
experience "really" occurred as described by the witness. Granted, it is
impossible for any investigator to judge this absolute value; often, a
subjective value for two categories of "strangeness" and "reliability" is
assigned. The Reliability value is a subjective value imposed by the
investigator or compiler (or both) with a scale such that the low values
represent cases with little information content and observers of limited
observing abilities and the higher values represent those cases with
excellent witnesses (pilots, police, etc.) and also are well-investigated.
Naturally, cases with higher values are preferred. The Strangeness value
is another subjective evaluation of the case, and assigned a value of 0 to
9, based on the peculiarity of the experience. NLs with little variance
from the appearance of a star or aircraft are given low Strangeness values,
while cases involving entities or structured craft observed at close range
(and therefore unlikely to be conventional objects) are given high
Strangeness values.
The average Reliability of reports was 6.21, and the average
Strangeness was 5.64. In other words, most UFO reports are only slightly
unusual (perhaps a light maneuvering in an odd manner unlike an aircraft's
normal flight pattern), and are either minimally-investigated, reported by
average observers, or both.
More revealing is the ratio of Strangeness/Reliability. This is a
measure of the unusual nature of a case versus its information content. A
ratio of unity suggests that an "uninteresting" case, probably explained
easily as a conventional object, has a low information content.
Alternatively, unity can suggest a case with high Strangeness, perhaps a
Close Encounter, has high information content and is well-investigated. A
ratio near zero implies a conventional object that is well-observed and is
well-investigated. A ratio greater than unity implies a report has high
strangeness but low information content. A possible such case would be a
close encounter case that is not well-investigated, and may be more
anecdotal than "real".
Explained reports had an average S/R ratio of 0.586. Cases with
Possible or Probable explanations had an average ratio of 0.690. Cases
with Insufficient Information had ratios greater than unity, at 1.062, and
Unknown cases had an average ratio of 1.092. From these values, we can
suggest that as the Strangeness of reports increase, so does their
likelihood of being poorly investigated and of having less credible
witnesses.
Cases were coded and entered into an ACCESS database on a common PC
clone environment. The coding key is as follows:
Example:
9920115 1636 BC Fort Nelson DD 6 7 1.30 2 Red Disc P Sound heard
Field: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Field 1 is the date, in YYYMMDD format (UFOROM is now coding to allow
for the next millennium).
Field 2 is the time, according to the 24-hour clock, local time.
Field 3 is the Province.
Field 4 is the Geographical Location, or common map name.
Field 5 is the Modified Hynek Classification.
Field 6 is the Strangeness, as described in the text.
Field 7 is the Reliability, as described in the text.
Field 8 is the duration of the sighting, in minutes and seconds
(i.e. 2 minutes, 15 seconds is 002.15)
Field 9 is the number of witnesses.
Field 10 is the colour of the primary object.
Field 11 is the shape of the primary object.
Field 12 is the Conclusion given to the case: I = Insufficient
information for an assessment; P = Possible or probable explanation,
given the facts; E = Explained; or U = Unknown or unexplained at the
present time.
Field 13 contains any short comments that distinguish individual
cases.
A further breakdown of Unknowns can be done to select only those cases
with high Reliability (i.e. Reliability 8). In the 1991 study, only 12
cases (7.3%) were high-reliability unknowns. In 1992, this number was 17
cases (7.62%). This agrees reasonably well with the 1989 results (4.9%)
and with the 1990 results (4.6%), but is slightly higher for reasons that
could include sampling techniques and inconsistent subjective evaluations.
The 1992 high-reliability cases were the following:
ND Case 9920122 1940 NB Woodstock
NL Case 9920202 2000 NB Hartland
ND Case 9920304 2130 ON Toronto
ND Case 9920419 0130 NF Gander
PH Case 9920502 1200 BC Kelowna
C1 Case 9920503 2010 BC Squamish
NL Case 9920513 2204 BC Langley
ND Case 9920624 0015 BC Vancouver
DD Case 9920703 0840 BC Kyuquot
ND Case 9920717 2200 AB Fairview
NL Case 9920720 1215 ON Toronto *
ND Case 9920720 2358 MB Winnipeg
ND Case 9920721 2330 MB Winnipeg
C1 Case 9920915 2300 BC Summerland
ND Case 9921007 1930 SK Moosomin
C4 Case 9921101 0200 MB Winnipeg
C1 Case 9921127 2000 SK Saskatoon
The interpretation of this list is that these cases were among the
most challenging of all the reports received in 1992. It should be noted
that many UFO cases go unreported, and that there may be ten times as many
UFO sightings that go unreported as those which get reported to public,
private or military agencies. Furthermore, it should be noted that some
cases with lower reliability ratings suffer only from incomplete
investigations, and that they may well be more mysterious than those on the
above list.
NL Case 9920720 has erroneous data, as 1215 is hardly a nocturnal
time. The single C4 case needs some explanation as well. In general,
Close Encounters of the Fourth Kind are "abductions," and are difficult to
use as data in analyses. Often, C4s occur throughout an experiencer's
life. Furthermore, an exact time of an abduction is rarely given or
deduced by investigators. In fact, some C4s are only uncovered through the
(controversial) use of hypnosis, and the time of occurrence is vague or in
dispute. Because abduction experiences are difficult to pigeonhole into
various rigid categories and time constraints, it is usually inadvisable to
include such cases in UFO report analyses. The C4 case included in the
above list did seem to provide enough data for inclusion. The date and
time were accurately known, and represented a single event, not an ongoing
series of experiences. In addition, the witness voluntarily provided
details of the experience and submitted to an investigation.
In future analyses of UFO data, it is unlikely that similar C4s will
be included. The experiences do not lend themselves to statistical
comparisons with other UFO reports, and can be interpreted in many ways.
The C4s included in the 1992 Canadian UFO Survey provided insight into the
problems involved in their objective evaluation.
We have learned that UFOs are constantly being reported at a rate of
about ten per month across all of Canada, and one or two per month in most
provinces. Witnesses range from farmhands to airline pilots and from
teachers to police. Witnesses represent all age groups and racial origin.
What is being observed? In most cases, only ordinary objects. However,
this begs a question. If people are reporting things that can be
explained, then the objects they observed were "really" there. Were the
objects we can't identify "really" there as well? If so, what were they?
These are questions only continued, rational research can answer, and
only if researchers have the support and encouragement of both scientists
and the public.
Chris A. Rutkowski
Ufology Research of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba
29 March 1992
Further Comments
It is most instructive to compare the UFOROM analyses with those of
the National Sighting Research Center of New Jersey, headed by Paul
Ferrughelli. The NSRC results have been reported in a series of
publications, a recent one being the National Sighting Yearbook 1991. The
NSRC collected UFO reports from newspaper clippings and UFO publications,
and analyzed the raw UFO data. Because of the difference in data sources,
a comparison with the UFOROM results will not be true. However, it is
still interesting to compare the two studies.
The NSRC tabulated a total of 195 American UFO reports in 1990, and
197 in 1992. These numbers are comparable with those of Canada for the
same years. However, because of the larger population, it is likely that
the USA had many, many more sightings that were never obtained through the
NSRC's sampling technique.
The NSRC study revealed essentially a reversed monthly distribution
for UFO reports compared with Canada. Whereas US sightings peaked in the
winter and had a noticeable trough in the summer, the Canadian peaks are
traditionally in the summer. However, the 1991 Canadian distribution was
much more even, with peaks in both winter and summer. Grouping the two
studies together yields a monthly distribution with troughs in mid-summer
and mid-winter, with slight variations month-to-month. It is possible to
speculate that with adequate report sampling, there would be no monthly
variation in the number of sightings, except for major flaps which would be
more noticeable in an international survey. The 1992 monthly distribution
is much more uniform, The 1992 American data had monthly distribution
peaks in March, September and October. No such peaks were evident in the
Canadian data.
Like the Canadian study, the American data was unevenly distributed
throughout the country. Most American reports in the 1991 study generally
came from just two states, Florida and Indiana. The Florida flap is likely
due to the Gulf Breeze reports which receive a great deal of media
attention. The distribution of sighting duration was nearly identical to
the Canadian study. The average duration of a typical UFO sighting is
about 15 minutes.
For the hourly distribution of UFO cases, the American study found a
symmetrical distribution with a pronounced peak at 9 PM local time and a
trough at around 9 AM local time. Canadian distributions are normally
about one hour later in each peak, but are otherwise identical in
distribution. Breakdown by Hynek classification yields identical
distributions within both American and Canadian studies, with NLs being
overwhelmingly predominant.
In summary, Ferrughelli's analyses of American UFO data yield results
remarkably similar to the UFOROM Canadian studies, despite the differences
in collection procedures. The most marked discrepancy between the two
studies was in the monthly distribution of UFO reports. This was probably
an artefact of the NSRC sampling technique, which does not involve
solicitation of UFO reports from investigators but significantly relies
upon newspaper accounts for many of its cases. The two studies are
complementary, and will aid further research into the UFO phenomenon.
[Reference: Ferrughelli, P. National Sighting Yearbook 1991. National
Sighting Research Center, 60 Allen Drive, Wayne, NJ 07470.]
Here is the 1992 Canadian UFO Survey sighting database in text format.
======================================================================
1,9920105,2300,BC,SQUAMISH,NL,1,2,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,SUSPECTED
METEORITE
2,9920107,245,BC,SARDIS,NL,5,4,7.5,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,I,JUMPING STAR
3,9920212,603,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,1,4,20,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,CONVENTIONAL
AIRCRAFT?
4,9920215,1425,BC,SURREY,DD,5,4,1,1,,IRREGULAR,I,ODD-SHAPED CLOUD AND LIGHT
5,9920216,2100,BC,LADYSMITH,NL,2,2,10,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,STAR
6,9920220,2305,BC,QUESNEL,NL,7,6,55,3,,RECTANGLE,I,PLATE WITH COLUMNS?
7,9920223,300,BC,RICHMOND,NL,5,4,5,1,,IRREGULAR,I,CHANGED SHAPE SEVERAL
TIMES
8,9920307,1200,BC,SURREY,DD,7,5,20,1,SILVER,DISC,U,OBJECT APPEARED METALLIC
AND STRUCTURED
9,9920309,2000,BC,SURREY,ND,3,5,10,1,VARIABLE,OVAL,I,CHANGED COLOURS
10,9920309,200,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,ND,2,5,60,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,RED AND
BLUE FLASHING LIGHTS
11,9920311,2205,BC,PENTICTON,NL,1,4,.01,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,METEORITE
12,9920317,2111,BC,PRINCE GEORGE,NL,7,7,.3,2,GREEN,IRREGULAR,U, LONG,
GREEN, FLUORESCENT TUBE
13,9920317,1330,BC,KITTIMAT,NL,7,5,15,1,,CRESCENT,U,1/4 MOON-SHAPED OBJECT,
MOVING
14,9920318,305,BC,HORSESHOE BAY,NL,2,5,.03,1,WHITE,IRREGULAR,P,SLOW, BRIGHT
STREAK
15,9920320,1315,BC,VANCOUVER,DD,7,6,1,2,,SQUARE,I,
16,9920321,1000,BC,HEFFLEY CREEK,NL,3,4,30,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,STROBE,
FLASHES
17,9920326,25,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,3,5,5,3,,POINT SOURCE,I,SATELLITE
18,9920327,2310,BC,RICHMOND,NL,1,5,60,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,PLANET
19,9920401,1600,BC,MISSION,C1,8,7,45,2,,,I,OBJECT SEEN IN THE SKY
20,9920401,300,BC,WHITE ROCK,NL,5,4,.1,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,ROTATING, THEN
SPLIT IN TWO
21,9920402,215,BC,LILLOOET,NL,4,3,1,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,LIGHTS JUMPING UP AND
DOWN
22,9920404,115,BC,NEW WESTMINISTER,NL,6,6,.15,1,,TRIANGLE,P,
23,9920510,2100,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,NL,1,2,.1,1,,,I,
24,9920520,2330,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,5,3,2,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,7 LIGHTS,
ALTERNATING FLASHES
25,9920524,0,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,NL,6,6,10,1,,TRIANGLE,U,V SHAPED OBJECT, NO
SOUND
26,9920528,1500,BC,SURREY,DD,4,3,5,2,,,I,OBJECT WAS MOVING OVER POWER LINES
27,9920603,1845,BC,WHISTLER,NL,7,7,.25,1,,IRREGULAR,U,TOP-SHAPED OBJECT,
HOVERED
28,9920604,2015,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,7,5,2,2,,IRREGULAR,U,SILENT PLATFORM IN SKY
29,9920606,2000,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,1,2,.01,1,,,I,
30,9920612,1924,BC,PITT MEADOWS,NL,7,2,12,1,,,I,OPAQUE OBJECT;
ALTERNATIVELY MOVING AND STOPPING
31,9920703,840,BC,KYUQUOT,DD,8,8,90,1,,OVOID,U,SOLID-APPEARING EGG; SEEN
FROM TUGBOAT
32,9920708,2340,BC,SURREY,NL,1,2,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,METEORITE
33,9920710,27,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,6,6,15,25,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,E,LASER SHINING
ON CLOUDS
34,9920711,2135,BC,CHILLIWACK,NL,4,4,120,1,,,I,UNDEFINED OBJECT, MOVING
35,9920716,1910,BC,SURREY,NL,1,2,.1,1,WHITE,,E,CAR LIGHTS
36,9920719,305,BC,WEST VANCOUVER,C3,9,6,1,2,,,U,ENCOUNTER WITH ENTITIES
37,9920817,100,BC,SURREY,NL,4,4,15,4,,,U,
38,9920818,1918,BC,COQUITLAM,NL,4,2,.1,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,E,DISTANT
HELICOPTER
39,9920831,320,BC,DUNCAN,NL,8,6,60,2,,IRREGULAR,I,CYLINDER WITH ARMS
40,9920901,1530,BC,VANCOUVER,DD,6,3,30,2,,ROUND,I,MOVING FAST
41,9920906,1650,BC,WEST VANCOUVER,NL,2,2,25,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,E,STAR
42,9921011,0,BC,NELSON,NL,5,5,.03,3,,SPHERE,I,BOUNCING BALL IN SKY
43,9921013,2100,BC,SECHELT,ND,7,6,40,1,,DISC,U,ROCKING BACK AND FORTH
44,9921015,2245,BC,VANCOUVER,ND,5,3,.05,1,,ROUND,I,ROUND OBJECT WITH LIGHTS
45,9921021,23,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,NL,6,3,10,2,,,I,FLUORESCENT LIGHT
46,9921021,250,BC,BURNABY,NL,6,5,2,1,,,I,3 SMALL OBJECTS, ONE LARGE
47,9921029,1930,BC,VERNON,NL,2,2,.1,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,STAR
48,9921116,30,BC,DELTA,ND,7,3,4,1,,TRIANGLE,U,DELTA WING; NOISE HEARD
49,9921119,535,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,1,2,.15,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,BUOY OR BOAT LIGHT
50,9921205,2000,BC,WILLIAMS LAKE,ND,7,6,8,1,,ROUND,U,BLINKING OBJECT
51,9921213,2310,BC,WHITE ROCK,NL,2,3,60,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,OBJECT
BOBBING IN THE AIR
52,9921214,2300,BC,WHITE ROCK,NL,2,3,90,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,OBJECT
BOBBING IN THE AIR
53,9921225,430,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,NL,8,3,30,1,,IRREGULAR,I,PENCIL SHAPE,
THEN FANNED OUT
54,9920829,120,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,C2,9,7,30,2,,,I,DOG'S FUR CAME OUT AFTER
ENCOUNTER
55,9921123,2320,BC,BURNABY,NL,5,4,5,1,,CIGAR,I,TORPEDO-SHAPED OBJECT
56,9921207,1915,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,6,2,60,1,WHITE,,E,SEARCHLIGHT
57,9920112,1900,ON,LAMBTON,C4,9,6,30,1,WHITE,,I,'ABDUCTION'?
58,9920120,2000,NB,WOODSTOCK,NL,8,8,10,10,,POINT SOURCE,I,VIDEO TAKEN BY
SOME WITNESSES
59,9920120,200,ON,BRACEBRIDGE,C4,9,6,30,2,,,I,'ABDUCTION'; ENTITIES SEEN
60,9920124,2215,BC,ALEXIS CREEK,ND,8,8,1,3,YELLOW,TRIANGLE,I,DELTA, SLOW
MOVING
61,9920126,1945,ON,LAMBTON,C1,7,8,60,4,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,P,PHOTOS TAKEN;
STAR?
62,9920200,2000,ON,MISSISSAUGA,ND,8,5,1,3,,DISC,I,SUCER WITH LIGHTS
63,9920202,2000,NB,HARTLAND,NL,9,9,2.5,2,,TRIANGLE,U,VIDEO OF TRIANGLES;
'BOW TIE'
64,9920218,630,BC,KAMLOOPS,C1,6,8,.15,1,RED,,P,CAME WITHIN 100FT;
DISAPPEARED
65,9920218,630,BC,KAMLOOPS,ND,6,8,.2,1,BLUE,ROUND,P,SHINY BALL WITH TAIL
66,9920218,630,BC,KAMLOOPS,ND,6,8,.1,2,BLUE,ROUND,P,SILVER/BLUE OBJ. WITH
TAIL
67,9920218,1830,BC,COQUITLAM,NL,6,8,.2,2,WHITE,,E,'BLOWTORCH LIGHT'
68,9920218,1825,BC,RICHMOND,NL,6,8,.1,1,BLUE,,P,BOLIDE?
69,9920218,1830,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,6,8,.15,2,GREEN,,E,BOLIDE
70,9920218,630,BC,KAMLOOPS,NL,4,9,.1,20,BLUE,,E,BOLIDE
71,9920311,230,YK,WHITEHORSE,NL,7,8,2,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,GROUP OF
ROTATING LIGHTS
72,9920312,1830,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,5,9,.15,2,WHITE,,P,'LIGHT STREAK'
73,9920326,1730,BC,SURREY,NL,9,7,5,1,YELLOW,POINT SOURCE,U,BRIGHT LIGHT
ENTERED CLOUD; DISSIPATED
74,9920415,600,YK,WHITEHORSE,C1,9,7,2.3,10,SILVER,BALL,U,GLOBE;BLINKING
LIGHT;FLEW THRU VALLEY
75,9920419,130,NF,GANDER,ND,8,9,8,3,RED,RECTANGLE,U,VIDEO OF WHITE OBJ
W/RED UNDERCARRIAGE
76,9920501,1945,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,ND,6,6,1,4,RED,,I,
77,9920502,1200,BC,KELOWNA,PH,8,8,5,3,,,U,HORSES REACTING;PHOTO OF SAUCER
IMAGE
78,9920503,2010,BC,SQUAMISH,C1,9,8,4,3,ORANGE,DISC,U,SLOW-MOVING;DISCONTINUOUS
TRAJECTORY
79,9920503,2130,BC,VANCOUVER,ND,7,8,.15,2,GREY,CIGAR,P,OBJ W/DULL GLOW;VERY
FAST;1000FT?
80,9920504,2350,BC,WHITE ROCK,C1,8,7,2,2,SILVER,DISC,U,SILVER/ORANGE DISC
MOVING AT TREETOP LEVEL
81,9920506,2015,BC,WEST VANCOUVER,NL,6,8,.3,1,RED,OVAL,I,HOVERED; MOVED AWAY
82,9920513,2204,BC,LANGLEY,NL,7,9,3,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,U,3 LIGHTS MOVING
TOGETHER
83,9920517,2130,BC,NEW WESTMINSTER,C1,8,5,10,3,SILVER,DISC,I,DISC WITH BLUE
'LASER BEAMS'
84,9920600,2000,YK,WHITEHORSE,ND,7,7,5,10,BLACK,TRIANGLE,U,TRIANGLE WITH
LIGHTS: AURORA AIRCRAFT?
85,9920602,1240,ON,PORT PERRY,NL,7,9,.25,6,YELLOW,POINT SOURCE,P,MAGNESIUM
FLARES
86,9920624,15,BC,VANCOUVER,ND,8,8,1.3,1,ORANGE,TRIANGLE,U,ORANGE GLOW
W/WHITE HAZE; LIGHTS ON EDGE
87,9920710,2300,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,NL,8,9,.3,3,WHITE,POINT
SOURCE,P,'METEOR' DESCENDED THEN ROSE AGAIN
88,9920720,1215,ON,TORONTO,NL,8,8,4,3,RED,,U,'LASER' SHINING ON GROUND;
ANIMALS SCARED
89,9920810,2000,AB,GUY,ND,8,4,1.3,3,GREY,DISC,I,PALE DISC, FLASH OF LIGHT
90,9920813,1250,ON,HAMILTON,NL,7,8,2,5,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,I,VIDEO TAKEN
NEAR BINBROOK
91,9920824,2000,SK,SASKATOON,NL,8,9,20,20,YELLOW,,E,MILITARY EXERCISE
92,9920915,2300,BC,SUMMERLAND,C1,9,8,20,3,GREY,DISC,U,'BIGGER THAN HOUSE';
BLUE BEAM
93,9921007,1930,SK,MOOSOMIN,ND,8,8,10,1,BLACK,DISC,U,DISC WITH LIGHTS
MANEUVERED NR. WITNESS
94,9921025,1400,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,DD,7,8,15,2,WHITE,,P,'HI-TECH' PLANE
FLYING NR. OTHER PLANES; NO SOUND
95,9921103,1745,BC,CAMPBELL RIVER,ND,7,7,.3,2,GREY,TRIANGLE,U,'WING' WITH
LIGHTS ON EDGES
96,9921126,1820,BC,OLIVER,NL,7,7,1.5,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,I,SIGHTINGS ALSO
REPORTED IN USA
97,9921126,1950,SK,SASKATOON,NL,5,9,480,4,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,'YO-YO
MOVEMENTS'; PROBABLE STAR
98,9921126,2000,SK,SASKATOON,NL,6,8,60,10,,,I,MANY REPORTS OF OBJ. & LIGHTS
99,9921127,2000,SK,SASKATOON,C1,8,8,.45,1,GREY,TRIANGLE,U,'BOOMERANG'
OVERFLEW CAR; LIGHTS ON EDGES
100,9921200,2000,BC,108 MILE HOUSE,ND,8,8,1,4,BLUE,CYLINDER,I,LARGE
CYLINDERS MOVING AT TREETOP LEVEL
101,9921200,200,BC,HORSESHOE BAY,C1,8,9,20,1,YELLOW,,I,INTENSE LIGHT OVER
CAR, FOLLOWED WITNESS
102,9921218,400,BC,LAC LA HACHE,C3,9,7,30,1,,,I,3 ENTITIES SEEN BY CHILD;
VERY UPSET
103,9920831,2215,NB,ALMA,NL,3,9,.06,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE
104,9920901,2220,NB,SACKVILLE,NL,3,9,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE
105,9920913,2114,ON,LONDON,NL,3,9,.04,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE
106,9920915,0,NB,SACKVILLE,NL,3,9,.02,1,,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE
107,9921013,18,ON,LONDON,NL,3,9,.01,2,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE,
FRAGMENTED
108,9921121,0,ON,OTTAWA,NL,3,5,.01,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,PROBABLE BOLIDE
109,9921203,2000,AB,FORT MCMURRAY,NL,3,9,.1,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE
110,9921209,2245,PQ,TADOUSSAC,NL,6,9,.02,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,'LOUD BANG'
111,9921216,645,SK,SASKATOON,NL,3,9,1,5,,POINT SOURCE,I,PROBABLE BOLIDE
112,9920325,2000,MB,CROSS LAKE,NL,7,7,30,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,VIDEO OF
'STARS';APPARITION OF VIRGIN MARY
113,9920813,100,ON,WINONA,NL,6,7,20,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,I,2 LIGHTS MOVING
NEAR CN TOWER
114,9920813,0,ON,HAMILTON,NL,5,5,15,1,WHITE,,I,
116,9920814,100,ON,HAMILTON,NL,6,7,2,1,ORANGE,,I,7 LIGHTS IN TRIANGULAR
FORMATION
117,9920505,2100,ON,BELMONT,DD,8,7,1,4,WHITE,DISC,P,5 PHOTOS IN SEQUENCE;
BLIMP?
118,9920112,1900,ON,SARNIA,ND,6,6,30,1,,,I,HOVERED,MOVED TOWARDS WITNESS
119,9920125,200,ON,GRAVENHURST,NL,5,4,5,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,OBJ. OVER TREES;
WITNESS 5 YRS. OLD
120,9920125,0,ON,PENETANGUSHING,NL,4,7,1,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,DISTANT LIGHT,
HIGH SPEED
121,9920320,2200,ON,HAMILTON,ND,7,7,2,2,RED,DISC,I,DISC FOLLOWED CAR
122,9920505,2230,ON,LONDON,NL,4,7,5,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,BRIGHT LIGHT
MOVING NEAR HORIZON
123,9920531,2345,ON,TORONTO,ND,6,7,5,1,WHITE,TRIANGLE,I,WEDGE-SHAPED OBJ.
WITH COLOURED LIGHTS
124,9920524,2000,ON,MISSISSAUGA,NL,3,6,3,6,WHITE,POINT
SOURCE,P,SLOW-MOVING; 1KM DISTANT?
125,9920530,2300,ON,SCARBOROUGH,NL,5,7,5,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,3 PAIRS OF
LIGHTS MOVING OVER LAKE
126,9920520,1600,ON,UXBRIDGE,DD,8,7,30,2,,TRIANGLE,I,HOVERING OBJECT;
4000FT ALT.?
127,9920602,1600,ON,SCARBOROUGH,DD,7,7,3,2,SILVER,IRREGULAR,I,'BUMPY' OBJ.
VARYING SPEED
128,9920721,30,ON,TORONTO,NL,7,7,3,4,,,I,'LASER BEAM' ON GROUND; NOISE LIKE
TRUCK BRAKES
129,9920813,50,ON,GLANBROOK,ND,6,7,4,2,,ROUND,I,VIDEO OF HOVERING BRIGHT
OBJECT
130,9921024,2000,ON,POINT PELEE,NL,4,6,60,5,,POINT SOURCE,I,UNUSUAL DISTANT
LIGHTS
131,9921103,2000,ON,TORONTO,ND,6,6,.3,1,,TRIANGLE,I,
132,9921203,200,ON,TORONTO,NL,3,7,1,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,MULTIPLE
HOVERING LIGHTS
133,9920315,2215,ON,MISSISSAUGA,C1,8,6,4,2,GREEN,DISC,U,100 YDS AWAY;
METALLIC WITH LIGHTS
134,9920304,2130,ON,TORONTO,ND,8,8,45,8,GREEN,IRREGULAR,U,'FLUORESCENT
LIGHT' STATIONARY ABOVE CLOUDS
135,9920102,1630,NF,WESLEYVILLE,DD,6,6,6,1,BLACK,ROUND,I,NRC N92/1
136,9920109,1720,PQ,AYLMER,DD,8,5,1,1,WHITE,DISC,U,NRC N92/2; DRAWING; 8
YR. OLD GIRL; NOISE HEARD
137,9920117,1800,BC,TOFINO,ND,4,7,.1,2,YELLOW,TRIANGLE,E,NRC N92/3; BOLIDE
138,9920122,1940,NB,WOODSTOCK,ND,8,8,80,2,BLUE,TRIANGLE,U,NRC N92/4; 10
MIN. VIDEO
139,9920117,2050,MB,BIRDS HILL PARK,NL,6,6,10,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC
N92/5; 3 TRIOS OF LIGHTS NR. HORIZON
140,9920214,655,PQ,VICTORIAVILLE,NL,4,5,10,2,RED,ROUND,I,NRC N92/6; ROUGE
GLOBES, EN LIGNE
141,9920224,2005,NB,LAKEVILLE,NL,3,5,.1,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/7;
LIGHTS FLASHING ACROSS A FIELD
142,9920303,20,BC,FORT NELSON,ND,7,6,2,3,GREEN,CIGAR,U,NRC N92/8; HOVERING
OBJ. WITH LIGHTS; ZIG-ZAGGED
143,9920304,1935,MB,THOMPSON,NL,3,7,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/9;
PILOT OBSERVED FIREBALL
144,9920306,2145,NS,DALHOUSIE,NL,7,6,4,1,ORANGE,,I,NRC N92/11;
GLOWING,STOPPED THEN 'BURST AWAY'
145,9920310,217,,,NL,6,7,2,3,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/12; PILOT&CREW
WITNESSES
146,9920311,1549,BC,,DD,7,5,1,3,,,I,NRC N92/13; SPINNING OBJECT WITH LIGHTS
147,9920314,0,,BUTTONVILLE,NL,3,6,.02,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/14;
PROB. BOLIDE
148,9920306,2240,MB,THOMPSON,C2,9,6,15,3,BLUE,,P,NRC N92/10/17; HAIRY
CREATURE W/RED EYES
150,9920402,118,MB,MCCREARY,C1,8,6,.05,2,RED,,U,NRC N92/20;ROUND RED
'BULBS' DISAPPEARED
151,9920402,2358,ON,THORNHILL,NL,4,6,2,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/21;
LIGHTS ZIG-ZAGGED
152,9920408,2200,NF,ST.JOHNS,NL,3,6,.15,1,,,P,NRC N92/22; FIREBALL W/SMOKE
TRAIL
153,9920411,346,MB,DAUPHIN,NL,6,6,5,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/23;
'LATER' LIGHT ON ROAD AHEAD
154,9920414,800,ON,OTTAWA,NL,3,6,.03,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/24;
PROB. BOLIDE
155,9920419,2000,NF,COBB,ND,6,6,2,2,ORANGE,ROUND,I,NRC N92/25;
156,9920426,10,NT,FORT SMITH,NL,3,6,.05,1,BLUE,,P,NRC N92/26; PROBABLE
BOLIDE; 'STREAK'
157,9920427,1200,ON,MERRICKVILLE,DD,7,6,.02,1,RED,CIGAR,I,NRC N92/27;
TORPEDO-SHAPED, FLASHING FIRE ON SIDES
158,9920427,0,,,NL,3,6,.05,1,GREEN,,P,NRC N92/28; BLUE TRAIL
159,9920429,2210,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,4,6,.15,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/29;
GROUPS OF LIGHTS, NO SOUND
160,9920507,2230,SK,RADISSON,NL,4,6,3,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/30;
FLASHING LIGHT NR. HORIZON
161,9920524,900,PQ,THURSO,NL,3,6,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/31;
ROND AVEC TRAINEE
162,9920500,2245,ON,OTTAWA,ND,4,5,6,1,WHITE,,I,NRC N92/32; OBLONG LIGHTS
163,9920601,2150,ON,,C1,7,6,6,2,RED,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/33; 'POWER
INTERRUPTION' AS LIGHT WAS SEEN
164,9920601,100,ON,,ND,5,5,5,1,WHITE,,I,NRC N92/34; 20X SIZE OF SUN, NR.
HORIZON
165,9920611,2330,ON,CORNWALL,NL,3,6,.1,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/35;
FALLING LIGHT
166,9920615,148,BC,SURREY,ND,4,7,.04,2,ORANGE,ROUND,P,NRC N92/36; FALLING
BALL, BROKE IN PIECES IN AIR
167,9920615,2200,ON,BRACEBRIDGE,ND,4,7,.02,2,WHITE,ROUND,P,NRC N92/37;
ORANGE&BLUE TAIL, SIZE OF MOON
168,9920622,0,PQ,STE-SABINE,DD,7,5,1,1,,DISC,I,NRC N92/38; PHOTO&SKETCH OF
SAUCER
169,9920628,2155,PQ,TROIS-RIVIERES,NL,4,6,.02,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC
N92/40; PROBABLE BOLIDE
170,9920706,323,AB,TABER,C2,8,7,10,1,BLACK,DISC,U,NRC N92/41; SAUCER 20M
AWAY, UGMS FOUND LATER
171,9920706,2215,ON,OTTAWA,ND,6,6,5,1,,OVAL,P,NRC N92/42; MCDONALD'S BLIMP?
172,9920715,2150,ON,,NL,4,6,10,1,RED,,I,NRC N92/43 'LARGE COMET'
173,9920715,2120,BC,NELSON,NL,3,6,.02,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/44; 3X
SIZE OF EVENING STAR
174,9920717,2200,AB,FAIRVIEW,ND,8,8,30,50,SILVER,IRREGULAR,U,NRC N92/45;
NOT A BALLOON, RCMP WITNESSES AS WELL
175,9920722,2200,NB,ALLARDVILLE,DD,8,7,5,4,WHITE,TRIANGLE,U,NRC N92/46;
DRAWING OF UNUSUAL CRAFT
176,9920728,2140,NS,BIG BADDECK,ND,7,7,.3,2,YELLOW,IRREGULAR,U,NRC N92/47;
LIGHT W/ZIG-ZAG APPENDAGE
177,9920729,2302,NB,FREDERICTON,NL,3,6,.01,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC
N92/48; PROBABLE BOLIDE
178,9920730,2324,BC,MISSION,ND,7,6,.15,1,YELLOW,DISC,I,NRC N92/49; UPPER
PART W/8 LIGHTS, YELLOW ON LOWER
179,9920818,2001,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,3,6,.1,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/50;
PROBABLE BOLIDE
180,9920819,2300,AB,CALGARY,NL,6,6,3,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/51;
HUMMING SOUND
181,9920820,430,ON,,NL,6,6,30,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/52; PILOT WITNESS
TO 15 LIGHTS IN ROWS
182,9920825,2320,ON,,ND,8,5,20,1,,DISC,I,NRC N92/53; 'UPSIDE DOWN SOUP
BOWL', HOVERING
183,9920831,310,PQ,MONTREAL,NL,6,5,20,1,,,I,NRC N92/54
184,9920907,2020,SK,LA RONGE,NL,3,7,.02,1,YELLOW,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/55;
PROBABLE BOLIDE
185,9920907,2040,SK,LA RONGE,NL,3,7,.03,1,YELLOW,POINT SOURCE,E,NRC N92/55;
'REAL PRETTY ONE', BOLIDE
186,9920913,905,,,NL,3,5,.1,1,ORANGE,,P,NRC N92/57; SMOKE TRAIL; BOLIDE
187,9920930,2300,PQ,HEMMINGFORD,DD,7,7,15,2,SILVER,TRIANGLE,U,NRC N92/58;
'OVNI A TRES GRANDE CIRCONFERENCE'
188,9921007,1905,ON,OTTAWA,NL,7,6,.4,1,,,I,NRC N92/59; 4 LIGHTS IN SQUARE,
MOVING
189,9921009,1855,ON,,NL,4,7,.3,2,WHITE,,P,NRC N92/60; SEEN FRM PLANE OVER
LAKE ERIE
190,9921009,1930,ON,TORONTO,NL,4,6,.2,2,,,P,NRC N92/61; LINEAR LIGHT SEEN
FRM APT.
191,9921013,2100,AB,HYTHE,NL,6,6,120,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,U,NRC N92/62;
STROBE LIGHT IN DENSE FOREST
192,9921028,2030,NS,,NL,6,6,1,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/63; MANY LIGHTS
SEEN
193,9921105,2224,,,NL,3,5,.4,1,,,P,NRC N92/64; LEFT SMOKE TRAIL
194,9921108,1830,MB,LUNDAR,C2,8,7,.1,1,WHITE,,U,NRC N92/65; CAR STOPPED
WHEN 'SPARKLERS' APPEARED
195,9921111,1800,PQ,POINTE-AU-TREMBLES,ND,7,6,30,1,RED,,I,NRC N92/66; 3
LIGHTS BRIGHTER THEN DIMMER
196,9921119,130,,,NL,5,5,5,2,RED,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/67
197,9921120,632,ON,OTTAWA,NL,3,6,.03,1,GREEN,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/68;
PROBABLE BOLIDE
198,9921120,640,ON,NORTH BAY,NL,3,6,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/70
199,9921121,2320,ON,OTTAWA,NL,6,6,15,2,YELLOW,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/71;
FORMATIONS OF LIGHTS, HIGH ALTITUDE
200,9921127,2250,AB,FORT MCMURRAY,NL,5,6,1.5,2,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC
N92/72; FLARE?
201,9921128,1930,AB,IRMA,NL,4,7,1,2,,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/73; PROBABLE
BOLIDE
202,9921205,2150,ON,,NL,4,5,10,1,BLUE,,I,NRC N92/74
203,9921208,743,ON,VERNON,NL,4,6,.2,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/75; PROB.
BOLIDE
204,9921208,745,ON,OTTAWA,NL,3,6,.03,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/76
205,9921208,750,ON,,NL,4,5,.15,0,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/77
206,9921209,1745,ON,,NL,5,5,25,2,ORANGE,ROUND,I,NRC N92/78; STATIONARY
ROUND OBJ.
207,9921213,545,ON,,NL,3,7,.1,1,RED,,P,NRC N92/79
208,9921213,755,ON,,NL,5,5,20,1,BLACK,ROUND,I,NRC N92/80; ROUND OBJ. WITH
SMOKE TRAIL
209,9921225,1920,ON,,ND,7,7,2,3,WHITE,CIGAR,U,NRC N92/81; UNKNOWN OBJ. SEEN
FROM AIRCRAFT
210,9921225,1930,PQ,SALLUIT,NL,5,5,1,1,,,I,NRC N92/82
212,9920331,2230,MB,PINE RIVER,C2,7,7,.05,3,WHITE,,U,'DUST KICKED UP';
FLASH SEEN
213,9920300,2300,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,6,7,.1,2,WHITE,,P,6 LIGHTS IN ECHELON
FORMATION
214,9920509,1800,MB,WINNIPEG,DD,6,7,.05,1,SILVER,CIGAR,P,'LIKE PLANE GOING
DOWN'
215,9920600,2000,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,6,6,.15,1,WHITE,,P,6 LIGHTS IN DIAMOND
FORMATION
216,9920717,2300,MB,TYNDALL,NL,6,7,.05,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,FOUR BLUE
LIGHTS FOLLOWING A WHITE ONE
217,9920720,2358,MB,WINNIPEG,ND,7,8,.11,2,RED,DISC,U,PILOT SAW FORMATION OF
6 DISCS
218,9920721,2000,MB,WINNIPEG,ND,7,6,15,3,WHITE,OVAL,U,'ALUMINUM' OBJ. MOVED
SLOWLY IN ARC
219,9920721,2330,MB,WINNIPEG,ND,7,8,.2,2,WHITE,TRIANGLE,U,PILOT SAW 4
'DELTAS' IN V-FORMATION
220,9920722,2000,MB,WINNIPEG,DD,7,6,8,1,WHITE,DISC,U,'LIKE PIECE OF THE
MOON'
221,9920800,2000,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,6,3,1,1,RED,,I,LUMINOUS OBJECT
222,9920819,2255,MB,WINNIPEG,ND,5,7,1,1,WHITE,,P,VIDEO OF SLOW-MOVING LIGHT
NR. AIRPORT
223,9920912,2300,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,6,7,.1,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,U,13 DISCS IN
FORMATION SEEN BY PILOT
224,9921017,1800,MB,ASHERN,DD,8,7,1,1,BLACK,TRIANGLE,U,'MANTA RAY' FLYING
SLOWLY NEAR HOUSE
225,9921101,200,MB,WINNIPEG,C4,9,8,30,1,,,U,ABDUCTION REPORTED BY NURSE
226,9921103,1700,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,3,5,.2,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,P,'FLARE
MOVING DOWN'
--
Chris Rutkowski - rutkows@ccu.umanitoba.ca
University of Manitoba - Winnipeg, Canada