💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › ta3cus$jj0$2@gioia.aioe.or… captured on 2023-06-14 at 14:28:15. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2022-07-16)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Firefox text/gemini

Message headers

From: Christian Seibold <krixano@mailbox.org>

Subject: Re: Firefox text/gemini

Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 02:17:49 -0500

Message-ID: <ta3cus$jj0$2@gioia.aioe.org>

Message content

On 4/20/2022 1:55 PM, Jason McBrayer wrote:

news@zzo38computer.org.invalid writes:
> threeoh6000 <threeoh6000@news.eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> Are you using XPCOM with this because that's was retired ages ago AFAIK.
> Yes, but I am using a old version of Firefox. (WebExtensions does not seem
> to do everything that I want it to do. Do you know if it does?)
You can't write a WebExtension that's a Gemini client, because JS
doesn't have access to raw sockets. For this same reason, the current
version of the OverBite extension for Gopher isn't a complete solution
in itself; it rewrites URLs which are then served by the Floodgap
Gopher-to-HTTP proxy.

JavaScript is starting to add things for sockets now, and Mozilla had

this thing a while ago where they were trying to implement dweb

(distributed web) protocols into Firefox. I'm not sure if they continued

this though, or how far along JS Sockets are.

Related

Parent:

Re: Firefox text/gemini (by Jason McBrayer <jmcbray@carcosa.net> on Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:55:06 -0400)

Start of thread:

Firefox text/gemini (by news@zzo38computer.org.invalid on Sat, 05 Mar 2022 09:42:23 -0800)