💾 Archived View for tommi.space › Demystifying%20the%20Draft%20EU%20AI%20Act.gmi captured on 2023-06-14 at 14:24:50. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

By Michael Veale

Michael Veale

De-harmonization of laws in different countries enforces EU’s need to introduce regulations. Nevertheless, they should always be aimed at reducing trade barriers among EU countries.

Material scope: marketing and use of AI systems (minus military), defined very broadly; (no obligations apply to all AI systems)

Assessing different kinds and entities of risk.

Manipulation prohibition

Title II, article 5

A prohibition on marketing, putting into service or use of:

Commission examples

<br>

Social Scoring

Title II, art 5

A prohibition on marketing, putting into service or use of:

<br>

Remote “real-time” law enforcement biometrics

+++

<br>
<br>

Clearview AI would not be likely to be sanctioned, instead the result of their data is shared with law enforcement agencies.

+++ other firm

Google Takeout etc. does not exactly fulfill and comply with GDPR, they just give you part of the data. Individuals’ data is useless by themselves because it makes sense only if and when placed in a framework formed by all of other customers/users’ data.

Transforming people/users in points in multi-dimensional spaces, where their proximity determines the category they belong to.

<br>

AI Act and Product Regulation

The New Legislative Framework is a 40 year old approach to regulating complex products using pre-marketing approval; essentially a toolkit to determine regulations.

<br>
<br>

AI Act fails to deal with general purpose models-as-a-service

The panoptic sourge - +++ professor in North Carolina